Trump’s allies are planning to take over the Senate floor this week in a bid to pass the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act, setting up a major test for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), who is under pressure from Trump and the MAGA base to extend the debate over voting reform for as long as possible.
GOP senators are playing their cards close to the vest ahead of this week’s marathon debate over the SAVE America Act, which would require people registering to vote to show documented proof of citizenship.
But they’re bracing for long hours and possible late nights in a bid to build momentum for the bill, which already has broad public support. A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris poll of 1,999 registered voters found that 71% support the SAVE America Act.
Trump allies, frustrated that they aren’t able to force Democrats to stage a talking filibuster to block the bill, are pressing Thune to keep the measure on the floor as long as possible to force Democrats to defend their opposition.
They still need 60 votes to pass it and that just isn’t going to happen without major concessions. If they make the ID free and automatically issue it to all registered voters and make election day a national holiday then it may have a snowballs chance at getting through
National holidays have nothing to do with giving people time off to vote, unless they’re government employees or work in the finance sector.
But they’re bracing for long hours and possible late nights in a bid to build momentum for the bill, which already has broad public support. A recent Harvard CAPS/Harris poll of 1,999 registered voters found that 71 percent support the SAVE America Act.
That’s pretty depressing. But then, I suppose low-information people would support any bill if they just called it “The Good Law Act.”
Oh, right, that’s basically what they did when they passed the, what was it called, Big Conservative Wet Dream Bill last year.
Edit: Oh, seeing the headlines alongside the poll that are all extremely suspect and right-washing, I wanted to check further.
Despite that TheHill reports uncritically about it and it is somehow associated with Harvard, the poll was commissioned by Stagwell Global, a marketing firm that is run by Mark Penn, who is apparently a “deep state” conspiracy theorist and Trump supporter, and contact info for the poll is not Harvard, but Stagwell, who also somehow was allowed to “release” the poll (“Stagwell (NASDAQ: STGW) today released the results of the February Harvard CAPS / Harris poll…”).
All in all I feel the most likely fit for the above is this is propaganda and not reliable.
Mark Penn, who is apparently a “deep state” conspiracy theorist and Trump supporter
Among other things.
I wonder how many of those 1999 registered voters would be disenfranchised if this came into effect, but don’t realize it because they didn’t read what ‘documented proof of citizenship’ actually entails…
How many republican women have access to a qualifying passport with their maiden name?!
I feel like Democrats shouldn’t have been fighting the Republicans on this. The law is popular, not entirely unreasonable, and potentially going to hurt Republicans rather than Democrats at the polls.
In a vacuum, most people are not opposed to the general idea of needing an ID to vote. I’m certainly not.
What people are opposed to is the federal government running elections when the Constitution says they’re run by the states, or requiring people to pay to get an ID, or disenfranchising people by making it difficult to get one.
Poll taxes are, and always have been unreasonable. Not only will it disenfranchise 40 million women, and force them to pay to vote, no matter what they pay, they will miss the mid term elections. Because the government cannot process 40 million passports or name changes before then.
Thanks for saying “I don’t care who gets sent as collateral, dems should just roll over again” Every singlr trans person gets banned from voting. Thanks for supporting my disenfranchisement.
It would be reasonable if there were documented, regular, and widespread instances of fraud involving non citizens voting. There are not.
Portraying it as unreasonable is saying you are okay with disenfranchising millions of disproportionately poor and minority voters because you are scared of a literal fantasy. Which is to say, you’re being ignorant either willfully or not.
It’s not enough to have fair elections - a democracy needs elections generally perceived as fair. It would have been better if the Republicans hadn’t created the widespread, false perception that voter fraud is common, but the fact of the matter is that they did and merely trying to convince the public that there is really no problem hasn’t worked so far. If 71% of the voters want to have to show proof of citizenship, and if most of the ones prevented from voting because of that are low-information voters likely to vote for Republicans anyway, I say let the Republicans shoot themselves in the foot.
So they should allow a corrupt government to decide who gets the documents needed to vote? Sorry metro Atlanta, couldn’t get your passports in time. Rural counties, we got yours done first!
