Advisers told me not to say it

is the right “build up” before the punch line.

He’s bragged about destroying the world through Iran war with the same brag before. Also adding, that destroying world is good for America because of high US oil production and US doesn’t need Straight of Hormuz.

So there’s always been a tails we lose, heads we deserved to lose all along, plan for the war.

Like supposed end to Iran war after mid terms… why doesn’t he just start burning America now?

U.S. will burn like France if Democrats triumph in November’s midterm elections. - DJT

From their 2nd article on scroll. There would be a higher chance of riots if GOP can rig elections in their favour again.

Chief diaper changer is another one that Wiles resents. She also acts as Trump’s news filter, but both prevent any actual government experts/contrarian access. Chief diaper changer may be one at top of list for chief of staff.

props for the candidate to denounce the flyers. Jill Stein only shows up 1 month before elections.

Not sure what you mean. MoU was a very pro Iran concession. Trump denounced it after signing it. Sure, MoU was a vector to criticize war outcome, but that was implicit encouragement to break it right away. The only possible end to war is Trump declaring victory and leaving. US establishment completely incapable of committing to peace and concessions to Iran.

Still war powers (essentially forced withdrawal) votes have been close in current congress. Everyone knows US is losing, and it is only constraint over Trump, that can end losing more longer. Impeachment of EVERYONE comes on the table. Fine, is DNC interference in favour of Israel objectives possible to not stop anything? Only if you don’t vote hard enough.

I possibly misspelled with 2 g s . Your version is clockwork oranging my eyes successfully.

If they tell the pollsters the same thing, their “likely voter” models pick that up. This is by far record low net approval rates for a President heading to mid terms. Senate needed to stop shenaremovedns.

Turnout is all that matters, and polls anticipate turnout/motivation.

Always be voting for lesser evil! Rural people get luxury gay space communism voting lines. Seniors/evangelicals always turn out. You better believe that evangelicals hold their nose when they vote for Trump, but Armageddon and Israel worship is part of their programming. If you be voting, then your opinions will matter in the future. If not, then you will be safely ignored, because lemme nazis will remind you the only time politics matter to you, that DNC is shit.

Seniors now have -21 net approval of Trump down 24 from Oct 24. They may vote against him.

Rural voters overall have -20 net approval. Down 40 from Oct 24. Rural Republicans still net positive, but 26% disapprove of Trump, and 60% disapprove of Iran war related energy costs. There will be some flips from former, and more abstains from latter.

Show the fuck up. Protest DNC the next day, and organize next primaries or 3rd party.

There is no deal for diesel imports from Russia. A lifting of sanctions on Russian energy is relatively inconsequential because Russia has enough customers for all of its energy exports despite the sanctions. Russia does have a current diesel export supply problem. It will still export to friends of Russia over the US, although this does represent global pricing relief. No US refinery will take the political hit of importing Russian diesel/oil. Ukrainian nazi rulership did express openness to an energy ceasefire declared by Trump. Some global pricing relief after mid terms could occur if they obey. Iran can transship diesel through Russia if price is high enough.

Still, purpose of sanctions relief on Russia is to counteract military strike plans on Iran, and Iran’s retaliatory capability. Zionazi Russophobe vermin senator posturing does this BS fully knowing US is not going to import any Russia diesel.

He says/does a lot of stupid things that his lackeys are forced to ignore or try to dismiss as a joke. Bragging/praising crowd’s unconditional love for the stupid crook is an example of a dumb thing to say.

Thank you, thank you. I knew you’d like that one. You’re such a great crowd. Wouldn’t it be great if Iran could nuke LA and San Diego so that “real Americans electoral votes” could count more, and we could keep congress? Please go out and cheat really hard in midterms, and for 4 more years in 2028!!! Did I say that out loud? Who knows with me.

NATO is a nazi organization. Pro Russia is the same smear as calling anti genocide views pro Hamas. Majority of Serbians view 90s NATO bombings of Serbia as unfriendly, and Russia as helping their resistance. Your political outcomes are categorically hopeless as long as you define yourself by your manufactured selective nazi hatred.

More BS techniques he uses with the name change…

reporter: “Yet another expert has warned AI can cause significant destruction. Should we try to stop that?”

DJT: Well its called SI now, so…

Yet another mental/sycophancy problem with Trump that is a 25th amendment disqualifying reason for presidency. You can’t just have surrounding lackeys just praise his renaming of things, but especially absurd to declare an enemy anyone who doesn’t follow the absurdity. Can’t have a super dumb (with a b) Fuhrer defining super intelligence.

Some stage of AI could earn the label SI. A panel of experts, instead of fraudsters colluding with fraudster in chief would set a standard, IMO, higher than current LLM capacity. IMO, SI would be a status/standard beyond AGI, which is still a somewhat amorphous definition, but one for experts to debate.

Promoting SI as an exaggerated marketing buzzword, with bonus unquestionable obedience to terminology, gives AI and our super high IQ ruler, deserved unquestioned obedience. Why would you want to regulate/slow down super intelligence trying to help us get to skynet?

It’s not doubling down, but rather claiming all of a sudden that it would be a bad thing. Nazi cronies originally excused it as “the left can’t take a joke” because tone/words seemed to obviously welcome it.

California happens to be one of the safer distance-wise places from Iran missile range. Even if a missile from Iran could reach California, one with a heavier bomb would reach eastern sea board, or Israel.

Fundamentally, peace with Iran is the logical conclusion from this phantom fear. Instead of continuation of illegal permawar. Massively other negative consequences well within Iran demonstrated capability occur as a result of permanent war/oppression of Iran. Zero benefit to Americans.

Think of it this way. The portion of the salary they COULD have paid you, they instead keep from you to pay for your health insurance.

That’s my core point. Unions also tend to prefer 30% higher cost health plans because its non taxable to their membership, and life being shittier for the rest of us, is reason to apply to join their union.

Once we get beyond this mode of thinking we can realize that we can, instead, delegate the government to pay for our health insurance.

Yes. And and both polls and “marketing” of M4A ignore this principle.

Still remarkably low,

When told such ⁠a single-payer model would eliminate private insurance plans

There are medicare advantage supplements provided by private insurance that would continue. I’m sure the only people who like private health insurance are ones where employer is paying the majority share.

The best question would be would you prefer an after tax raise as a result of M4A? (based on following table)

where a 4% income tax surchage for a M4A plan that saves overall economy $1T, $60k salary would net $7500 as single plan, and $23500 in family plan in extra disposible income, when employer passes on their savings as extra salary.

$1T in savings also means $1T in additional disposible income for non-healthcare/insurance economy, and more employment/business profits in “useful economy” that multiplies to more economic growth.

So, the proper poll question is do you want a big after tax salary increase, with huge economic growth that gives you more job/raise opportunities, or do you want a corrupt extortion based healthcare system with private AI/death panels that denies you coverage?

From this to secret “mythical end of war after the mid terms” magic, the only reason for secrecy is that they would be horribly unpopular plans that would negatively impact mid term election results if they were done/disclosed now.

What makes me angry is their “example voter” asks “I’m left on immigration, tell me about the candidates”

1. Dumb basis for election. Only impeachment will stop wanton murder and overreach on fascist show of force roundup of everyone tanned, and deportation to gulag host countries.

2. Congress will not create new legislation, though at best perhaps there will be some media circus over ICE abuses, and some conditions on funding which Trump will ignore.

3. gpt response is detailed support of Trump for GOP side, with zero information about Dem candidates or possible outcome/curtailment of Trump determined abuses of existing legislation.

I’m angry at both how stupid low information the voter is, regurgitating GOP “election focus issues” that are irrelevant to surivival, and have zero impact on WV, and the response that doesn’t cut through the irrelevant BS of that election issue to compare individual candidates. Only balance of power party supermajority in house can overcome BS.