• 163 Posts
  • 3.52K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle






  • 100%: that’s the kind of leader that tends to get nearly unswerving (real) loyalty and admiration from their team, too.

    I’ve seen plenty of weak leadership in both private sector and in the government in my personal work life, and when you see someone that is secure enough to be humble enough to seek out and value those that are better than them at things is something to truly treasure. If they don’t have someone sabotaging them from above, that team is often a sight to behold in how much they can accomplish.

    Weak leadership usually seeks out yes-men, will hire their friends, fraternity brothers, and former co-workers even when it makes no sense - will even engage in nepotism - in order to get people that will rubber stamp their activities









  • There are a whole lot of dumbasses out there would rather have a complete idiot in power rather than someone that makes them feel stupid, or, in other words, is clearly smarter, more educated, and more capable than they are.

    It’s an infuriating trait and I don’t understand it at all.

    I could do a better job than this idiot, and I am self-aware and smart enough to realize I have no business being anywhere near that kind of job. I happen to want people far smarter, more experienced, more education, and more wisdom than myself in there. I don’t feel smaller by having someone better than me in there.

    This is about the only job I can think of where there are certain types of idiots that cast about for non-experts for that role. You don’t people agitating to have “outsiders” in their sportsball team. You don’t see them calling for things like “term limits” on sports, either. Same for a whole host of occupations. People don’t put out ads for positions at companies seeking someone with zero experience, but who makes them feel good about their own capabilities in comparison.

    But, for a role that We, The People hire for, we have this incredibly bizarre and stupid selection criteria - dumb things that include “wanting to have a beer with them”, or “running the country like a business”. Things like intelligence, capability, education, wisdom, and experience don’t seem to really matter for this hiring process.






  • I think he’ll be framed as the “sensible” version of “maga” (conservatism) after PEDOnald is out of the picture, and being selectively pro-peace will be part of that framing.

    Even though James Bowman is worse given his associations with people like Thiel and books like The Unhumans.

    Donnie Dumbass is surely bad enough and is pretty much Faux News come to life, but due to being very stupid and off-the-chart narcissistic, he’s not very ideological or very effective at bringing about the really, truly crazy shit that these demons want to do to this country.

    James Bowman might be a whole other ball of wax. Thankfully his charisma level is about negative eleventy thousand.