Welp…

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Has he filed any paperwork? Gathered any signatures?

    Didn’t think so. It’s just typical Elmo Skum: hurricane force hot air scented with billionaire quantities of bovine effluvia.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I fail to see how splitting up the fascists is anything but a good thing. Let them fight.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Odd strategy.

    Leftists won’t buy it, and most liberals aren’t going to buy it, and it might divide the right, while team blue is fracturing.

    Gonna be a 4 on one, not a 3.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Reading the article to see what ridiculous name he’s going to give it.

    “The America Party”?

    TBH, pretty tame in Musk standards. At least it’s pronounceable.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The name is to make a grab at the r’s. If it wasn’t, he would have named it the x party.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I hope this would split the vote among magas and republicans and the dems would be a shoe in. Sadly, I’ve lost a lot of faith in the dems and their ability to effectively fight for the people. Maybe we need even more parties?

  • markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    One obstacle all third parties face in the US is party-line voting, which favors the dominant parties.

    On possible outcome is that he puts a lot of money into making third party candidates more viable, like efforts to ban party-line voting or supporting ranked choice voting. So, you could vote for the America Party candidate and then if they don’t have a majority ñ, you vote could roll over to the Dem or GOP candidate of your choice, reducing your risk of voting third party.

    These changes would help Libertarian, Green and other parties as well. More choice for voters!

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The entire Democrat demographic hates him for kissing Trumps ass.

    The entire Trump demogaphic hates him for going against Trump.

    And the Republican demographic have never liked him as far as I’m aware.

    So… who are his voters? Probably just a convenient way to shuffle money around.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Maybe that’s the only way US will ever get a third party. I’m not an American but I do think american politics system would be significantly stronger even with a minority 3rd party. Can you imagine how powerful US would be with a diverse parlament that has true competition of ideas not just partisan voting? That’s true “checks and balances”.

    • Ruxias@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We don’t need more false choice though. This would be a another bourgeois party. The cards might be shuffled a bit and the rhetoric might change but it’d still be playing the same game with the same cards. It’s still a game of “choose your favorite faction of rich people” despite the tweaks in messaging. There will still be an assurance of “nothing will fundamentally change” to the owners and donors.

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      When people say that they want a third part I doubt they mean it literally, as in they believe there are literally only two parties, but rather I suspect they mean that they want a third party which is large and influencial.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That is a ridiculous comparison. More political parties are a good thing.