

It’s called a firehose of falsehoods, and is designed to flood people with so much bullshit that they give up and stop paying attention to everything.


Wow, I knew dihydrogen monoxide was pretty nasty stuff, but this hydrogen hydroxide sounds so much worse!


Oh, I see, so because you can’t have perfect, we shouldn’t even try to make voting as accessible as possible ? That’sa rather defeatist take.
People can also vote by mail, or even vote early in many countries (for example, 12 days before the actual election day, here in NZ), but I expect you’ll find a reason to have a problem with that too?
Honestly, the fact that you even tried that argument is astonishing.


The fact that you guys hold elections on a work day is insane to the rest of the world.
Edit: Apparently some US states allow early voting, as several people have now proudly berated me for not knowing


There’s a fairly reasonable argument/conspiracy that melania is also his handler, given her father was in the KGB, and her upbringing in the soviet union, and besides, why the hell else would she stay with him when she clearly can’t stand to be anywhere near him.


At this point I’m slightly surprised he didn’t fill the pool with Ivermectin


I’ve never heard of the guy, but if he willingly associates with the pedo in chief, then one assumes he must be.


I said they may be right because we’ve not seen them take any other option. In other words, we lack the data to know if their ‘play it safe’ strategy is the one that results in the most votes, or not.
Perhaps you and others are reading too much into my post and think that I was supporting the safe option. I was not, I was merely noting what they continue to do. Perhaps this explains why I initially got upvotes for a few days and then got downvoted below freezing?


But the reason they put garbage candidates forward is because they regard them as a safe bet, not too radical for some, not too weak for others. … they may be right… it depends whether the vaguely inoffensive option results in the largest number of votes overall or whether a boldly progressive candidate with strong support of fewer voters gives them the better result. Dems always go with the safe option.
Edit: why are so many people downvoting this ? I really don’t understand ?


Don’t worry, some dirt will be invented, and unfounded rumours will be spread, well in time for her to lose.


It’s the same "many many very important people " that trump throws in to his word salads to give the impression of authority


Public intoxication is probably the only one he hasn’t done because he’s a tea totaler


There are four of them ?


Misread the headline and thought it said trump’s spiteful advisor.


Article is paywalled
Mirror mirror on the wall, who’s the best president of them all…