• 54 Posts
  • 1.01K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • One author is in the federalist society (the reason SC is corrupt)…

    And the other seems to believe international laws shouldn’t exist and Israel is totally cool…

    They want us to “accept” it’s corrupt and somehow do away with the entire notion of a SC and replace it with some “populist rule”.

    Similarly, progressives are increasingly converging on the idea of both expanding and “disempowering” federal courts. Attentive to the reality that the supreme court especially is not and rarely has been their friend, left-leaning advocates are finding ways to empower ordinary people, trading the hollow hope of judicial power for the promise of popular rule.

    To label as “nihilists” those sketching an alternate, more democratic future is, in other words, not only mistaken but outright bizarre. Rather than adhere to the same institutionalist strategies that helped our current crisis, reformers must insist on remaking institutions like the US supreme court so that Americans don’t have to suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule that makes a parody of the democracy they were promised.

    In Trump’s second term, the Republican-appointed majority on the supreme court has brought their institution to the brink of illegitimacy. Far from pulling it back from the edge, our goal has to be to push it off.

    They’re right wingers trying to hijack progressivism to destroy the SC after it changes all the laws to how they want, and before the left can use it as a weapon to change the laws back.

    I’d love to say people won’t be naive enough to fall for this, but I don’t want to lie



  • It’s not that they weren’t racist against Indians the whole time…

    It’s that there was no push for it or format where it was discussed.

    But with them taking so many college slots and H1-Bs, it’s only a matter of time till they get picked as a Boogeyman and/or scapegoat.

    MAGA will play the “we tried to rise above and work together” followed almost immediately by “but there’s just no substitute for a white man”. Likely at that point full mask off and explict.

    It’s plausible they try to take it back to only white landowners being allowed to vote, because that means they’ll keep winning.







  • Wild to me so many people have that view and just want to stop trying…

    Do you even understand that’s the propaganda the oligarchs push the hardest?

    That the lines of division they created can never be erased, and we always have to fight along the lines they drew.

    And that’s not even getting how if we win in spite of your views being popular, were just siletting ourselves up to fall for it again because your hung up on them being unchangeable, and that almost always means we don’t put enough resources into the next generation to prevent them from falling for the same shit








  • Great post OP…

    This post was rejected for the following reason(s):

    This is an automated rejection. No LLM generated, heavily assisted/co-written, or otherwise reliant work. An LLM-detection service flagged your post as >50% likely to be written by an LLM. We’ve been having a wave of LLM written or co-written work that doesn’t meet our quality standards. LessWrong has fairly specific standards, and your first LessWrong post is sort of like the application to a college. It should be optimized for demonstrating that you can think clearly without AI assistance.

    So, we reject all LLM generated posts from new users. We also reject work that falls into some categories that are difficult to evaluate that typically turn out to not make much sense, which LLMs frequently steer people toward.*