Look man, I did not ask for a source.

Obviously…

I’m saying that’s how a rational person would have handled this…

Something like:

Hey man, im not aware of any of that and couldn’t find anything on a search. Could you elaborate or point me in the right direction?

Super basic stuff.

You still dont understand any of this…

You could have asked questions, and then I could have explained things and even provided sources.

Instead of doing that, you want everyone to pre-emptively source everything like a scientific journal would do.

Like, do you this everywhere?

If someone told you today was Saturday, would start screeching “calendar! Calendar! Calendar!”

At them until they pulled out a calendar?

Why should everyone predict what you would require a source for, instead of you just asking for one when you wanted one like literally every single human before you has managed?

Why are you the special one everyone else has to accommodate?

Your conclusions about Biden are speculative and poorly supported

Man, almost like you read them on social media and not a scientific journal…

The guards who were supposed to check on him that night were online shopping after receiving large bank deposits days earlier…

If Biden had just investigated this shit when president it likely would have stopped trump. And he might have even been in jail before the last election.

There’s just so many different single things he could have done to prevent this, but that geriatric fuck we all held our noses for seemed to intentionally make the least popular decision with Dem voters at every opportunity.

We can’t afford to settle for someone like him again, we need someone that will actually fight like we need to.

Honestly pretty surprised…

Lots of authoritarians like being surrounded by attractive women in uniforms, so it’s believable trump did it.

I remember in Bogoto some high ranking dude had 3 legitimate super model looking women a company him when he came on board. They were all easily 5’8, but we’re in legit 6 in heals or more on top of that. Super weird running into them unexpected.

We’re running dangerously low on military psyop egirls ironically enough, so maybe that’s why they’re going to AI?

Lujan clearly isn’t able to handle this on her own.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQUa1rXMipo

Jesus fucking christ…

Kegsworth is at negative 15%, and…

Looking at historical polling data, Enten noted that former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney enjoyed 62-point net popularity around two weeks into the Gulf War,

77 point approval drop from this admin trying to run the 9/11 playbook.

It’s not that they’re more evil than Cheney, it’s that they’re just incompetent at selling the lie.

We can’t waste this momentum in the midterms on neoliberals.

What he said:

“Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby,” Kent wrote.

Wonder what the classified bit is?

$$$

Run of the mill republicans do t get near as much money as a D that will vote with Republicans.

Not to mention the attention.

If he was a Republican, no one would know his name, he’d just blend in

If I back 20 candidates and 3 win…

It calls into question the journalistic integrity of any publication who talks about how great I did and my awesome victory lap.

Or like a kid who got 10% on a test celebrating because of “all” the correct answers

Pretty sure the majority of AIPAc backed candidates lost…

AIPAC will always claim whatever happened means they’re winning, they’re high on their own propaganda.

It’s not just selling a “win” to voters but to Bibi back in Israel too.

Yeah, but that’s only because inflation is going to keep making the US dollar worth less.

Wait a minute…

"“Maybe if you’ve been in a real fight war, you might not be so keen for another.”

Yeah, Kat will be around for a long time and Biss doesn’t seem bad.

AIPAC tried to sponsor him, he turned them down, and AIPAC is still trying to take credit.

Kat lost, but so did AIPAC…

I’m nowhere near as excited about a billionaire buying so many primary elections as the billionaire owned media is for some reason tho.

Was happy to see Stratton has spoken out against Schumer tho

Responses were gathered 2/27 to 3/3 before consequences showed up, and 9% still identifying as MAGA but going against trump on something so big is significant

the homeland

Most of my ancestors got here before America was even a country…

Still ain’t my fucking “homeland” and AP using that phrase for a country of immigrants leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

The only people with a right to call America “homeland” are the indigenous people, and they’re definitely not running the modern American government.

a great non-sequitur that does nothing to help your argument

If you don’t understand someone’s train of logic, the best way to understand is asking them to fill in more gaps, so you can understand…

Not hard to understand

I agree, but clearly you’re still having difficulty.

I also agree that we’re not going to fix it here, some people are refusing to look at her as a leader, and want to defend her leadership based on her personal demographics.

I don’t have much patience for bigotry, even when it’s well intentioned.

Did you read the article far enough to get to where she defends him and said he should have been able to work security anyways?

Like, do you not see any responsibility on the rest of the security team to notice someone wasn’t who they said?

Who were they making paychecks out to? He was a contractor, congress wasn’t writing the checks.

And I know I’ll have to say it again “if the people she hired for vital positions were incompetent, she was incompetent”.

And now you’re just throwing out bullshit conjecture as fact

I don’t play war thunder but I assure you that’s a part of it…

I mean, just think logically, if they don’t verify the person in front of them is the person on the paperwork, what’s the point of any it?

Are you that dense that you think that she’s personally did the background check and verification/validation of this person on her security team?

Her team contracted him…

She choose her team…

I know I’m basically repeating what I just said tho:

Either her team was completely incompetent (which ultimately comes back on her) or they just didn’t give a fuck their security team member gave them a fake name.

But I don’t know how to make it any easier to explain.

So her team followed what was recommended and required by Congress

I’d be shocked if “verify this is the same person as the paperwork says” isn’t a step…

Man, I’m really glad Republicans didn’t manage to sneak her into the general for Senate…

Police said at a news conference after the shooting of Diamon Robinson, 39, that he had “multiple felony warrants” and a parole violation warrant. The warrants were for impersonating a police officer and for stolen license plates, NBC Dallas Fort Worth reported.

Police followed Robinson into a hospital parking lot Wednesday, NBC Dallas Fort Worth reported. He then barricaded himself in his car until police used tear gas to make him come out and then pulled a weapon, authorities said. Officers shot and killed him.

Crockett, who has been a member of Congress since 2023, said Robinson went by the name Mike King when he worked for her. She said her team “followed all protocols outlined by the House to contract additional security,” adding that it had been approved to hire the man it knew as Mike King.

Either her team was completely incompetent (which ultimately comes back on her) or they just didn’t give a fuck their security team member gave them a fake name.

How do you not catch that shit for any position, but especially security?!

And she still can’t accept responsibility for shit…