He’s got to pump it out over holidays, because it’s one of the few days right/left still mix.

The last thing the wealthy want is people sitting down at a table and realizing the shit we fight over isn’t as important as what the wealthy are doing to all of us.

It’s just a distraction to keep us from uniting against them.

So trump wants his voters riled up and angry so no discussions can happen.

Crazy thing…

When you don’t hoard all the wealth from state parties and prevent them from fighting in every election, we win less seats than if we put a legit effort into winning every possible elections.

But it takes billions to have a coin flip chance at convincing voters a neoliberal is better than a Republican, that’s just been the reality of American politics for decades.

If we stop shoving neoliberalism down voters throats, we don’t have to continuously rob the state Dem parties to pay for the one presidential campaign every four years.

If you’re not dead, no one cares.

If you’re dead, it now explicitly ties the person who pressured you to do it to your own crimes.

I think he even sent it to such a shit stain of a person just for optics. Maybe even to a known bad address knowing it won’t bounce back till you did it?

But still, pretty sure they read mail both out and into prisons…

So it’s weird this was postmarked days ahead of time. It makes it look like he was allowed to commit suicide and had no motive to hide it.

I think it’s one of those “two clever by half” things. He wanted to be subtle and sprinkle implications, but an actual video tape of trump doing horrible things wouldn’t even matter now.

The letter was postmarked “just days after Epstein died” in 2019, according to the progressive media company MeidasTouch. It was addressed to Larry Nassar, the convicted serial sex offender who was sentenced to 60 years in prison for abusing hundreds of children and young women.

In the alleged letter, Epstein addresses Nassar as “L.N.,” and makes a startling reference to “our president,” which would have been Trump at the time it was allegedly written.

“As you know by now, I have taken the ‘short route’ home. Good luck! We shared one thing… our love & caring for young ladies at the hope they’d reach their full potential,” the letter reads.

“Our president shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to ‘grab ------,’ whereas we ended up snatching grub in the mess halls of the system. Life is unfair. Yours, J. Epstein”

The redacting marker probably ran out ink…

Literally every one of your replies have attempted some kind of sleight or insult…

I’d ask how you ever hope to learn anything, but it’s pretty obvious that’s not your goal here.

Have a nice life bro, ignorance is bliss after all. I’m sure you feel great about every exchange you have, but it’s a shame you’ll never realize how much you have in common with the current president.

Trump is a pile of shit and so is anyone that supports him. Oh hey, I can make up stuff too.

So to clarify…

You don’t agree with your first statement?

Because logically that’s what you said, but I’m almost positive you didn’t mean to go full mask off trumper…

Edit:

In fact, I think this all comes down to a language issue…

I said:

Hillary is 100% the type

And you seem to not be familiar with that phrase because you replied with:

Wow, you must know Hilary quite well, considering the absolute that you are espousing

Which I should have picked up on that misunderstanding earlier.

But I’m legitimately trying to help you understand something, and you keep wanting a slap fight while somehow insisting I’m the rude one.

Trump also assumes no one knows anything he doesn’t know…

Do you often find yourself acting how trump and his supporters would act in a situation, or is it only when people are talking about the Epstein list?

How?

A spokesperson who knows it won’t be released said “release it”.

People forget when trump and Epstein were running around, and when trump and the Clinton’s were running around were the same time.

Why do you think Trump’s never actually went after either of them?

Hillary is 100% the type to just accept her husband is a child rapist, and use him and his knowledge of others’ activities to leverage the blackmail herself.

I feel like people forget how bad the Clinton’s were/are because trump showed up, which is literally the entire reason they talked trump into running…

I just don’t understand how you all are still falling for it.

I highly doubt it’s finished at the end of his term.

It might not be a pile of rubble, but if there’s anything there it’s going to be flimsy cardboard not up to code and needs to be torn down anyways.

Reminds me of China IL when Pony gets stuck in Mexico, crazy the voice actress went on to make the Barbie movie

We can’t have elections in the middle of a ballroom renovation!!

Oh, they know…

https://fedsoc.org/bio/ryan-doerfler

They want to trick people into dissolving the SC before the left gains control and can replace the problematic ones while taking steps to prevent this from happening again.

It’s like a kid that walks up and slaps a peer, then immediately says “no tag backs” and says the game is over…

The federalist society got what it wants out of the SC, and now they want people to stop abusing it before we can undo what they just did.

I don’t know why googling authors isn’t the norm when billionaires own all the media companies. If you don’t you’ll never notice clear hypocrites like Ryan Doerfler.

One author is in the federalist society (the reason SC is corrupt)…

And the other seems to believe international laws shouldn’t exist and Israel is totally cool…

They want us to “accept” it’s corrupt and somehow do away with the entire notion of a SC and replace it with some “populist rule”.

Similarly, progressives are increasingly converging on the idea of both expanding and “disempowering” federal courts. Attentive to the reality that the supreme court especially is not and rarely has been their friend, left-leaning advocates are finding ways to empower ordinary people, trading the hollow hope of judicial power for the promise of popular rule.

To label as “nihilists” those sketching an alternate, more democratic future is, in other words, not only mistaken but outright bizarre. Rather than adhere to the same institutionalist strategies that helped our current crisis, reformers must insist on remaking institutions like the US supreme court so that Americans don’t have to suffer future decades of oligarchy-facilitating rule that makes a parody of the democracy they were promised.

In Trump’s second term, the Republican-appointed majority on the supreme court has brought their institution to the brink of illegitimacy. Far from pulling it back from the edge, our goal has to be to push it off.

They’re right wingers trying to hijack progressivism to destroy the SC after it changes all the laws to how they want, and before the left can use it as a weapon to change the laws back.

I’d love to say people won’t be naive enough to fall for this, but I don’t want to lie

Mamdani gonna talk him into appointing Mero…

“Allegedly”

It’s not that they weren’t racist against Indians the whole time…

It’s that there was no push for it or format where it was discussed.

But with them taking so many college slots and H1-Bs, it’s only a matter of time till they get picked as a Boogeyman and/or scapegoat.

MAGA will play the “we tried to rise above and work together” followed almost immediately by “but there’s just no substitute for a white man”. Likely at that point full mask off and explict.

It’s plausible they try to take it back to only white landowners being allowed to vote, because that means they’ll keep winning.

This is the biggest hint that he’s on his way out.

He’s never have the balls to stand up for himself against a white supremacist if he thought he could keep his job.

It might be happening as soon as the new year.

That doesn’t make any sense.

Because if they were doing that, they’d have people who wanted to do it and wouldn’t require a bribe.

If they were bribing people, they’d demand payment be made after, and then just not pay them

Under no circumstance would they pay first and hope to not get ratfucked, because they fuck over everyone else at the drop of a hat.

This is the straw

Holy shit…

You still think it’s just a single straw…

What is so hard about this?

If the last million things weren’t enough for a group fo 100 people. Some of those 100 might just need “one more straw”. Some might need 5 or 6, everyone is different.

But there’s no way I can keep explaining this without coming off incredibly condescendingly. I’m gonna have to throw in the towel here, and in any future exchanges. I truly hope someone else helps you understand this, but I’ll never see if it happens.

just another 1 random vile post is enough for them to have some sort of epiphany and coming clean moment?

Yes…

How the fuck do you not understand that?

Would an idiom help?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_that_broke_the_camel's_back

Like, this a basic logical fallacy, it’s not just relevant here, it’s relative constantly. This is something that should have been taught to you as a child, but we can’t do anything about that now, just moving forward.

Like, if I offered you a dollar to do something unethical, and kept increasing the amount by a dollar till you agreed, the amount you agree to would be the total amount, not just one dollar because that was the most recent increase, the total is what matters.

Does this honestly not make sense to you?

Money only matters when the only two options play that game…

Musk could give Republicans a trillion dollars, it won’t stop an authentic progressive with charisma like Mamdani.

No amount of money can translate to votes like that.