Useless. Time for the Social Democrats to form their own party.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    Looks like there are 212 Democrat reps in the house, which puts it at a large majority which would rather “not cause a fuss” or whatever the fuck excuse they’re trying to bullshit this time.

    Useless people. Worthless people.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      What exactly do you think the outcome would be if the house successfully initiated an impeachment?

  • Floon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    128 Democrats join House Republicans to defend fascist dictator

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      They just don’t feel the need to hide anymore. Most of your “Democrats” are just Republicans with a different paint job.

    • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Their stance is Trump came out of his two impeachments politically stronger than he went into them, and unless 14 20 GOP Senators decide to switch their allegiance all of a sudden the act of impeachment is practically useless.

      Edit: I fucked up the math, thanks commenter

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Plus since the proceedings were guaranteed to fail (even setting aside the party votes, while Trump has committed many constitutional violations, this one is shared by several of his predecessors and was an especially stupid thing to hinge an impeachment vote on - doubly so because it’s not technically a violation until 60 days have passed), all they’d accomplish is burning a substantial amount of political will (something the Democratic party is severely lacking in) to… accomplish nothing but making Donald even worse? He already attacks Democratic states that have shown relatively minor opposition; if their representatives supported impeachment then life could suddenly become a lot harder for their constituents. Unless you’re an accelerationist it was a bad idea all around.

        (I should note I don’t support this rationale - cowardly appeasement has never worked - but I can understand it, at least in theory. I’m mostly pissed that they pulled this stunt on such a flimsy pretext when there were plenty of rock-solid justifications to base an impeachment on)

    • abbadon420@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      It’s not about how much of a threat he is, but it’s about the friends we made along the way.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        I have full faith that if the DNC had the votes to remove trump, which is 67 senators and a house majority, then they would go through with this impeachment trial.

        They have 47 Senators with caucus. This was never going to accomplish anything, and I’m glad we’re saving this for later.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Why save it for later? Because it would impede Congress from accomplishing its business? But it’s a Republican controlled Congress that’s hell-bent on passing more aspects of Project 2025. So obstruction is really the only play available for the Dems.

          If the shoe were on the other foot, McConnell or Gingrich would have held that brake pedal to the floor. Even though we all know there will be no personal consequences, it’s a method of Delay, Deny, Defend against the handover to fascism.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Laws pass through congress almost every day, on the 23rd this month the senate passed 13 bills including one that removed the requirement for Alaskan Native Villages to convey land in trust to the state while conducting business. We need a congress even if we don’t like the budget bill, the really bad stuff gets filibustered anyways.

            Aid must go through congress, arming our allies like Ukraine must go through congress, limiting state’s powers must go through congress. Even fucking USPS distribution centers and offices go through congress.

            Even if you hold the impeachment trial with no consequences, it comes off to the general public, who a plurality voted for Trump or majority voted for Trump or stayed home, as being unfair and heavily biased so it won’t gain any votes in the midterms either.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I am not. There should be an impeachment for every high crime, of which there have been a lot already. The Senate will convict eventually.

          Maybe need to wait for blue midterms before getting the ball rolling.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      21 days ago

      Okay but if you don’t remove 20 Republicans then it still accomplishes nothing. 67 Senators needed to remove Trump from office.

      • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        … are you seriously implying that any gains the party makes are pointless if they don’t hit the 2/3rds threshold?

        I’d sit this one out if I were you, take the time to brush up on politics and critical thinking.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          On the topic of Impeachment, yes, it means fuck all to primary these congressmen over not holding a silly ritual with no real consequences.

          Ditto for anything that requires a constitutional amendment or defeating filibuster like undoing citizens united or passing medical for all. We need to Remove the GOP, not just get better DNC.

          • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            “A silly ritual with no real consequences”

            … aside from

            • doing their sworn duty
            • showing the people they still care and are trying
            • paper trail of accusations, arguments, etc
            • VOTES - you get to see how everyone voted, which helps generally with ads during election time, and specifically when it comes time to hold sedition trials on all these Nazi collaborators.

            Again, you’re another person who needs some lessons on politics and procedure before commenting.

            Note: my bad, you’re still the same under educated, unqualified commenter as before.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago
              • doing their sworn duty to get paid to talk a lot, pass no laws, and not remove the perpetrator
              • showing the people they still care and are trying to get paid to talk a lot, pass no laws, and not remove the perpetrator
              • paper trail of accusations, arguments, etc which exist whether or not they get paid to talk a lot, pass no laws, and not remove the perpetrator
              • VOTES - you get to see how everyone voted on whether or not to get paid to talk a lot, pass no laws, and not remove the perpetrator, which helps generally with ads during election time, and specifically when it comes time to hold sedition trials on all these Nazi collaborators after the GOP are reduced to an extreme minority of congress.
          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Ah so you’ve just been trolling this whole time and don’t actually have the worst take on literally every subject.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Do any of your replies ever have anything to do with the comment above them?

              Heres some takes you can feel free to publicly disagree with:

              Dictatorships are an offense to humanity and the largest threat to our future.

              All people deserve opportunity for happiness and prosperity regardless of socioeconomic or ethnic background.

              We should tax the rich such that billionaires don’t exist.

              Reform should be the only goal of incarceration, which means providing the needs of inmates to accomplish that. Private Prisons should not exist.

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                When you say “racism is bad” or stuff like this to show how moderate you are, nobody disagrees with you. But then your dig in your heels about absolutely absurd bullshit.

                You’re expecting people to give each comment the benefit of the doubt. Lemmy is small and you’ve made a reputation for yourself.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  I’m sorry that you don’t agree that being against racism is a progressive stance.

                  Sorry but not surprised. Pretty standard for you Tankies.

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    21 days ago

    Here’s the full list of House Democrats who voted to table the impeachment articles.

    Pete Aguilar (California)
    Gabe Amo (Rhode Island)
    Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts)
    Wesley Bell (Missouri)
    Ami Bera (California)
    Don Beyer (Virginia)
    Sanford Bishop (Georgia)
    Julia Brownley (California)
    Nikki Budzinski (Illinois)
    Janelle Bynum (Oregon)
    Salud Carbajal (California)
    Andre Carson (Indiana)
    Ed Case (Hawaii)
    Sean Casten (Illinois)
    Kathy Castor (Florida)
    Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (Florida)
    Katherine Clark (Massachusetts)
    Emanuel Cleaver (Missouri)
    Jim Clyburn (South Carolina)
    Herb Conaway (New Jersey)
    Lou Correa (California)
    Jim Costa (California)
    Joe Courtney (Connecticut)
    Angie Craig (Minnesota)
    Jason Crow (Colorado)
    Henry Cuellar (Texas)
    Sharice Davids (Kansas)
    Don Davis (North Carolina)
    Madeleine Dean (Pennsylvania)
    Rosa DeLauro (Connecticut)
    Suzan DelBene (Washington)
    Chris Deluzio (Pennsylvania)
    Debbie Dingell (Michigan)
    Sarah Elfreth (Maryland)
    Cleo Fields (Louisiana)
    Shomari Figures (Alabama)
    Lizzie Fletcher (Texas)
    Bill Foster (Illinois)
    Lois Frankel (Florida)
    Laura Gillen (New York)
    Jared Golden (Maine)
    Dan Goldman (New York)
    Vicente Gonzalez (Texas)
    Maggie Goodlander (New Hampshire)
    Josh Gottheimer (New Jersey)
    Adam Gray (California)
    Josh Harder (California)
    Jim Himes (Connecticut)
    Steven Horsford (Nevada)
    Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania)
    Steny Hoyer (Maryland)
    Val Hoyle (Oregon)
    Hakeem Jeffries (New York)
    Julie Johnson (Texas)
    Marcy Kaptur (Ohio)
    Bill Keating (Massachusetts)
    Timothy Kennedy (New York)
    Ro Khanna (California)
    Greg Landsman (Ohio)
    Rick Larsen (Washington)
    John Larson (Connecticut)
    George Latimer (New York)
    Susie Lee (Nevada)
    Mike Levin (California)
    Sam Liccardo (California)
    Ted Lieu (California)
    Zoe Lofgren (California)
    Stephen Lynch (Massachusetts)
    Seth Magaziner (Rhode Island)
    John Mannion (New York)
    Lucy McBath (Georgia)
    Sarah McBride (Delaware)
    April McClain Delaney (Maryland)
    Jennifer McClellan (Virginia)
    Betty McCollum (Minnesota)
    Kristen McDonald Rivet (Michigan)
    Morgan McGarvey (Kentucky)
    Gregory Meeks (New York)
    Grace Meng (New York)
    Kweisi Mfume (Maryland)
    Joe Morelle (New York)
    Kelly Morrison (Minnesota)
    Jared Moskowitz (Florida)
    Seth Moulton (Massachusetts)
    Frank Mrvan (Indiana)
    Richard Neal (Massachusetts)
    Joe Neguse (Colorado)
    Johnny Olszewski (Maryland)
    Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
    Jimmy Panetta (California)
    Chris Pappas (New Hampshire)
    Nancy Pelosi (California)
    Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington)
    Scott Peters (California)
    Brittany Pettersen (Colorado)
    Nellie Pou (New Jersey)
    Mike Quigley (Illinois)
    Jamie Raskin (Maryland)
    Josh Riley (New York)
    Deborah Ross (North Carolina)
    Pat Ryan (New York)
    Andrea Salinas (Oregon)
    Mary Gay Scanlon (Pennsylvania)
    Brad Schneider (Illinois)
    Hillary Scholten (Michigan)
    Kim Schrier (Washington)
    Bobby Scott (Virginia)
    Terri Sewell (Alabama)
    Adam Smith (Washington)
    Eric Sorensen (Illinois)
    Darren Soto (Florida)
    Greg Stanton (Arizona)
    Haley Stevens (Michigan)
    Marilyn Strickland (Washington)
    Suhas Subramanyam (Virginia)
    Tom Suozzi (New York)
    Emilia Sykes (Ohio)
    Paul Tonko (New York)
    Ritchie Torres (New York)
    Lori Trahan (Massachusetts)
    Derek Tran (California)
    Lauren Underwood (Illinois)
    Juan Vargas (California)
    Gabe Vasquez (New Mexico)
    Marc Veasey (Texas)
    Eugene Vindman (Virginia)
    Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida)
    George Whitesides (California)
    
    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      My representative, who is generally a pretty progressive guy, is on this list. A local journalist asked about his vote, and the statement from his office was that the congressman is waiting for a classified briefing on the Iran strikes to help determine whether the president broke the law.

      I know that we live in a world where we expect not only a 24-hour news cycle, but 24-hour resolutions to all issues. Having a solid argument and proper evidence for impeachment is the sort of thing that moves more slowly than we would like.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Ah, Jim Clyburn, the jackass who helped Biden win the primary and put us on the path to the second Trump term.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        I hate that motherfucker with a seething red hot vengeful rage and I dont understand why that motherfucker keeps winding up in interviews.

    • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Really appreciate it. I’ve been telling myself I need to start adding to the emails of my reps, and used this list as the reason to start.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Send messages to your member of Congress on this list. They need to hear that you’re unhappy. They were hoping this vote would go unnoticed and you need to force them to be accountable.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Reaching obvious conclusions based on observations in reality is tankie shit, please refrain from doing so.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Is there a list of names? Because if any of my reps show up on this list, I will never vote for them again.

    I don’t want these fucking dinosaurs running the goddamn party anymore. I want some progressives with teeth who have the backbone to fight the fascists head on. I don’t care how petty or how low they have to get, I want to see them at least try.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Oh yeah, and all of these 128 Democrats will be very disappointed about something evil that the chertondoes later and “wish they would have voted differently”

    Fuck all of them