Summary

Donald Trump announced plans to reform U.S. elections, including mandating paper ballots, same-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship, while eliminating mail-in voting.

Trump criticized California’s ban on requiring voter ID, calling for a nationwide overhaul. Though mail-in and early voting surged during the pandemic, Trump has long opposed these methods, claiming fraud, despite evidence showing fraud rates are extremely low.

Critics argue his proposals could disproportionately affect rural, disabled, and nonwhite voters, potentially disenfranchising key Democratic-leaning groups.

The reforms would mark significant shifts in U.S. election policies.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      When he declared Nov would be the last election, and winning it meant they wouldn’t have to worry about elections again, he meant it!

      He’s doing exactly what he said he would do.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      they can also add rules to restrict the number of polling places, resulting in disproportionately long lines in cities where democrats live

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      When rural voters overwhelmingly voted for you, making it harder for them to vote seems like a great way to shoot yourself in the foot.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is it folks. If he is able to transform our election system with his own two hands, we’ve had our last fair election, I guarantee it. Fraud will be baked in, circumventing any design elements that are ostensibly there to guard against it.

    This is the scariest thing I’ve read since the election.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      They weren’t quiet about this being the last fair election we would have. I’m also not convinced it was actually a fair election.

      But whatever…too late to bitch about the fascists now.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      The writing has not even been on the wall here, it’s been part of the plan all along, he’s been saying it all along and it’s obvious after he tried to violently steal it last time.

      We’re in a situation where our only hope I they are too incompetent to pull off the democracy destroying evil they are promising.

  • splonglo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    And you’ll have to wait 10 hours to vote on a workday because they’ve limited voting locations to one every million people - like they already do in Georgia.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “mandating paper ballots… while eliminating mail-in voting.”

    Does he not know mail in ballots are paper ballots? 🤔

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 month ago

      The point is to eliminate voting options, the “justifications” are made up. Anything that moves closer to “not being able to vote” is the goal.

      • scutiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Paper ballots are also easier to falsify, with all the videos of box stuffing in corrupt countries.

        That said, Canada uses paper ballots and hand counting, and I’m not aware of any accusations of election fraud related to that ever happening.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          We also have a non-partisan federal elections agency. With individual US states in charge of running their own federal elections, there’s more room for Republican state-level government to cheat on the federal election

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “We’re gonna do things that have been really needed for a long time,” he said. “And we are gonna look at elections. We want to have paper ballots, one day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship.”

    This should come with a national day off for voting, and mandatory voting requirement.

    • Breve@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just the federal holiday would be enough. If someone is too lazy to vote when given a paid day off to do so, then I don’t trust they are informed enough to vote anyhow.

  • gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This motherfucker better be in a Popemobile 24/7. I got a bad feeling about this guy’s future existence.

  • Aolley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    fuck that, mail in voting has done so much good and it’s a prime step in stopping all this. if we had national mail in voting things would get better fast so no wonder they don’t want it.

    what would this mean for states that already do this

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think we all know what the party of small government and states rights thinks of states doing things they don’t agree with.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wouldn’t he basically need a constitutional amendment to do this. Which would be almost impossible these days.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Too bad for him the constitution clearly states “the states shall decide” - which is why we have the hodgepodge patchwork bullshit we have now. So he may want to change it, but unless he actually does light the Constitution on fire, this is unlikely to go anywhere.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Something something constitution

    Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

    The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

    https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S4-C1-2/ALDE_00013577/

    What was that about States rights?

    Oh, yeah, they only matter when they do what you want.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, but primaries aren’t controlled by the states.

      Which is why waaay back in 2024, the DNC and Biden were able to take all of NH primary delegates away…

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s not voting, though. That’s what the party decides.

        But, yeah, the DNC highjacked the ability of people to choose the nominee for their party. Again.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s not voting, though. That’s what the party decides.

          And (totally as a hypothetical) if pro corporate interests decided to interfere with primaries by donati g insane amount of money to pro-corporate candidates to ensure corps always win regardless of what letter is by the President’s name…

          Would you describe that as the illusion of choice when after decades those peo corporate interests controlled the parties and then (totally legally) directly influence the primary and ensure the corpo candidates always “wins”?

          And I’m not trying to be a dick here, but unless we fix primaries, we’ll never really “win” in the general, even when the Democratic candidate wins.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Your point is completely legit.

            Everything we believe about choice is an illusion. Propaganda. The dream is fiction.

            The public believe only 2 options exist. Because, no viable other options exist. At the moment. Any third party is either a spoiler by design, or so limited in scope as to be useless to most.

            Maybe now is the time to start another. A serious effort to form a citizen controlled, truly democratic, accountable, party. With its own primaries and rules. For the people.

            Not next election cycle.

            The DNC and RNC are irredeemably rotten because of the very concerns you’ve mentioned.

            Can’t repair rotted wood. You can cut out the decay and try to patch it up but you’re left with an unstable structure.

            You need to replace it.

            The difficulty is when the money realizes it could interfere and run propaganda to de-legitimize.

            Honest people who can own their faults, who are not afraid of their skeletons, who cannot be blackmailed, are needed.

            An impossible task to be sure.

            But, a lot of things have been impossible.

            If qanon and the tea party can take over a party in a few years…

            • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Does anything other than tradition prevent a candidate from running in the primaries of both the R and D conventions? Could the same person end up as the candidate for both parties?

              • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                2028 might provide an answer the way things are going…

                I don’t know the answer but I would assume party rules would prevent that somehow.

                But, if someone ran for and won the R nomination and the D didn’t do a primary to officially nominate anyone, and that person crossed the aisle… I have no idea what would happen. Maybe it is possible.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    cuts out 80% of the elderly vote in one swift motion

    cuts out unprepared idiots who don’t know any better before they leave their house

    There goes his voters.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jesus fuck. If this asshole gets rid of mail-in voting in Colorado…our voting system here is FANTASTIC.

    The qons ruin every thing. They plan on making everyone miserable and breaking everything.