I would love to be proven wrong, and to be just another overreacting fool.

Hasn’t happened yet.

That’s all well and good, and you certainly shouldn’t be sharing details about “what you do” online. But I can’t exactly blame the rest of the world for lumping us all together until the tumor is excised.

If there’s a table of ten people talking to a Nazi, you have a table of eleven Nazis. It originates from Germany, who I would consider an authoritative source on the subject.

I hate this reality, as a fellow american, but there is a popular saying about sitting at a table with Nazis.

Nah, he wouldn’t experience most of that. Give him a suit, set him loose in space three days out on a collision course with his tesla.

What a well adjusted individual, definitely not an agent provocateur.

Recalling all Canadian hockey players in the American hockey league?

China states that eating food reduces symptoms of starvation

WELL I GUESS AS A DEMOCRAT I MUST ABSTAIN FROM ALL FOOD TO PROVE THEM WRONG

If you want overtly lefty stuff without the chinese government ball fondling, solarpunk is a pretty good instance, or .blahaj if you’re more interested in social/gender issues.

This person unwittingly provides an excellent example of why many dislike .ml users.

Sorry - all it would do in regards to “countering the threat of gaming”

All it would do is force people to keep their very much still capable last gen computers lmao

Ever read Lamb: the gospel according to Jesus’s childhood friend, Biff? First place I’d heard of this idea.

Tell him to change his ways, obviously

You could argue against anything involving throwing a net to capture something, like monster hunter for the small fauna. Ark has “cryo pods” that function basically like pokeballs.

I think we all know what the party of small government and states rights thinks of states doing things they don’t agree with.

Ah yes, the pinnacle of toxicity, asking for solutions rather than meaningless grandstanding.

You could be productive, like discussing how to better influence primaries to have not shithead democrats, or campaign for rcv, instead you’ve offered no functional solutions and act like we should view your smugness as superior?

I don’t even know if you’d call this a devil’s advocate position - liberal’s advocate? But perhaps it’s worth asking if it’s better to have the infrastructure actually built rather than having the next admin reenact the trail of tears? I’m not sure I’m convinced, but I can see the reasoning.

I’m not saying I agree with the decision, but as Biden, would you really want your son somewhere Trump could immediately fuck with him as soon as he wanted? Had Kamala won this would absolutely be a dumbass decision. With Trump incoming… I get it.