Putin hates it because it was permuating the iron curtain back in USSR time. Obviously Putin’s little bitch hates it too.

Well, we also need to have more Einsteins and Teslas, but I’m not willing to be them either

Focusing direct attention on 4 out of 220 people and wording it as if those were the only people who did it isn’t a critisism, it’s a manipulation. It’s the same manipulation that was around for months before the election which lead to all this bullshit in the first place. For a median voter it makes this regular “both sides” bullshit, when in reality it’s 216 vs 4 people.

If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works. You can sometimes entice the public with enough vigor so they don’t focus on your politics, but outside of very rare cases, shifting to the right consistently brings some votes, and shifting to the left consistently brings loses.
And no amount of social media posts was able to change it weirdly enough.
It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

It doesn’t matter how much surveillance it is right now, if fascism comes, they will put out all that they need immediately

That’s the neat part about implementing fascism, you suddenly stop giving a shit about public support. Why do you think they were trying to do it that badly

Thanks, turns out I didn’t want to know that, but alas. Depressing that there is apparently known abbreviation for it.

Do I want to know what csam means?

They are, on the voting patterns, and that’s the only thing that matters in a democracy. They can think or talk whatever they want, but when it comes to choosing who will make all the decisions, they consistently chose rightwing candidates, often against their own stated interests.
Sometimes because they’re idiots who don’t know how their own country works, sometimes because they were lied to, but that doesn’t matter at all in the end. The vote of a dupped idiot just as valid.

Well, your supposedly existing leftists didn’t achieve even that. I don’t remember where I heard it, but the saying gows something like “Catering towards a fictional segment of the electorate is (demonstrably) a recipe for failure.”

For wast majority of Americans capitalist Harris is actually rapid communist comrade Harris. For significant majority of registered voters her existence is a rampant leftist propane and seven steps too far.
USians are firmly on the rigth, and unless you fix that, all your exciting candidates will achieve jack shit.

You weren’t offered that choice. You were offered a choice of tooth decay or less tooth decay, that’s it.

We assumed he is going to destroy the concept of the democracy. It’s very terrifying, without imagining nuking the country or something.

The goal was to destroy the government, and this achieves that. I don’t want to encourage people to sacrifice themselves, but returning back is the only way to prevent the total destruction of the government.

It’s actually pretty easy to be elected as a representative, those elections are way more connected to the people, it’s a local election and if you establish enough rapor with your community, you don’t need a huge number of people to get elected, local community rarely has conflicting opinions.
It is so, so not the way presidential elections go it’s not even funny, and even suggest that it is can not be a joke

GoG is just the best. They don’t have all the nice things Steam has, like workshop for example, but they compensate for it by actually selling you a game, not just renting it out with drm.

As much as I hate it, the doctrine of mutual destruction seems to work. The removal of it might lead to immediate hot world war

If she had polulist conservative platform, sure, they will vote conservative anyway, and non-sexist part of the undecided could be swayed. With left leaning however, no chance. Her core base don’t vote so they will fall off, a bunch of left leaning people prefer to be outraged to solutions so they will not vote because she will check 99 boxes out of 100 and for those people it might as well be satan incarnate, and a bunch of centrists will not vote for no woman something something sandwich. The rest are racists and will be outraged that a minority has an audacity to talk.

In a slightly saner world she would be nobrainer. Smart, young, active, has enormous support base. In current US political climate being smart and young is a disadvantage and being a woman is a political suicide, unless you’re very, very conservative.

Yeah, Americans are notoriously love intelligent women, especially if they’re not white.