Somehow, Snoke is just fine

Somehow, Snoke returned…

“Oh yeah? If you think America will not vote for a young smart left leaning woman with credentials, then why did America elected an old stupid right wing white criminal man twice?”.
Buddy, do you, like, have problems with all this “if a then b” stuff? Logic and all?

The fuck?

She is a representative from one of the NY district. That’s quite a unique situation, most of America isn’t like that. AOC is an amazing, smart, young woman politician, with great ideas. This combained with her nationality, means more than half of the country hates her with passion.

Bernie
Bernie situation is exactly like that. He is too old, and people who would be voting for him if he was younger, wouldn’t. However people who voted for trump would vote for a wet pile of rags if they affirmed their prejudices. That’s a fundamental struggle of the american broadly speaking “left”, you need to be a platonic ideal of a best person ever to even be eligible, and you will still lose to a platonic ideal of evil seven times out of ten.

Thiel was moved out of Germany when he was like 4. Either we admit that nurture is more important than the country of birth, or Hitler doesn’t count as German

They were on track to do so, but then Americans elected Trump and now he got all his shit back

This is part of the papers you want to see released.

We’re way past that. He’s doing full on fascist takeover

Daamn. Also, did you know, Hilary Clinton was using private email server, and sometimes she used it to talk to her official stuff. I bet that’s also very important.

Doesn’t look like people an mass give a fuck actually. Until he dies of a heart attack, he’s gonna be invincible. That comment about shooting people and not loosing support was probably first and only true thing he told in public.

Putin hates it because it was permuating the iron curtain back in USSR time. Obviously Putin’s little bitch hates it too.

Well, we also need to have more Einsteins and Teslas, but I’m not willing to be them either

Focusing direct attention on 4 out of 220 people and wording it as if those were the only people who did it isn’t a critisism, it’s a manipulation. It’s the same manipulation that was around for months before the election which lead to all this bullshit in the first place. For a median voter it makes this regular “both sides” bullshit, when in reality it’s 216 vs 4 people.

If voting patterns of America ever showed something consistently, it is the fact that shifting to the left in any sense never works. You can sometimes entice the public with enough vigor so they don’t focus on your politics, but outside of very rare cases, shifting to the right consistently brings some votes, and shifting to the left consistently brings loses.
And no amount of social media posts was able to change it weirdly enough.
It might have something to do with consistent anti-voting narrative of a lot of the vocal leftists, coupled with their bafflement that they consistently don’t get a desired outcome.

It doesn’t matter how much surveillance it is right now, if fascism comes, they will put out all that they need immediately

That’s the neat part about implementing fascism, you suddenly stop giving a shit about public support. Why do you think they were trying to do it that badly

Thanks, turns out I didn’t want to know that, but alas. Depressing that there is apparently known abbreviation for it.

Do I want to know what csam means?

They are, on the voting patterns, and that’s the only thing that matters in a democracy. They can think or talk whatever they want, but when it comes to choosing who will make all the decisions, they consistently chose rightwing candidates, often against their own stated interests.
Sometimes because they’re idiots who don’t know how their own country works, sometimes because they were lied to, but that doesn’t matter at all in the end. The vote of a dupped idiot just as valid.

Well, your supposedly existing leftists didn’t achieve even that. I don’t remember where I heard it, but the saying gows something like “Catering towards a fictional segment of the electorate is (demonstrably) a recipe for failure.”