• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    21 days ago

    The only thing that can stop a primary candidate with a platform like Mamdani, is depressed Dem primary turnout…

    The DNC chair didn’t endorse him in the primary, because this chair will never even glance at the scales during any primary.

    But literal days after Mamdani became the candidate, he gave a PBS interview talking about how if Dems want to win, we need to run candidates like Mamdani.

    We’ll get a fair primary with nothing holding us back, and voting in the Dem primary comes with zero obligations in the general. There is absolutely zero reason to stop voting in Dem primaries now. It’s more important than it’s ever been, because it’ll be the first fair one in at least 30 years.

    But all the stuff Mamdani is doing in NYC today, can be done nationwide in just a couple years if we don’t give up right before the finish line of a marathon

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      By the same token, now is the time to promote this message of hope and action wherever you see it, and proactively address expressions of doom and defeat, however harmless they may seem. We all share responsibility for this to the extent that, taken together, these attitudes constitute a climate of action or inaction.

      Now is not the time to give up and stay home, yet there are many currently in a state of deep hopelessness they feel compelled to spread. These comrades are effectively deactivated right now, and would deactivate others if only as a comfort to themselves, to validate their fear and justify their inaction. They don’t realize, or simply aren’t considering, how contagious and harmful it can be.

      Edit: If you ever wondered what JFK meant by “fear itself,” wonder no further. We’re all living in such times.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      Its important to see that candidates are winning by offering something to the voters. They aren’t running in orange man bad. They can feel that way, but it’s not why they are running

      There are like a bajillion studies relating voter psychology and political preferences. If you want conservatives to vote you run on anger, holding onto what you have, fear of the other. You want the other side to vote, you have to present a vision of what’s possible.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    This dude balanced the budget while increasing school funding and this? It’s almost like the DNC is full of thieves…

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    21 days ago

    This guy has some style. Who would have thought serving the publics needs would play so well?

    DNC, do you see any of this?

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    20 days ago

    As someone that used to buy produce wholesale at the same warehouse that several local supermarkets did, you have no idea how much produce is marked up for retail. None at all.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 days ago

      I suppose there’s a big markup to account for what they’ll end up throwing out, and then the high price is part of why there’s so much unsold and needing to be disposed of.

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Large scale covid inflation was caused by FED printing too much money. This isn’t something Mamdani can fix he can only do band-aid solutions on top of the issue.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      The funniest headlines from NYP and Fox are simultaneously promoting socialist democrats and criticizing the DNC centrist they are aiming to replace lol.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    Concerns with this model.

    • Scalping. What is preventing people from buying out the store in bulk and reselling outside the store for a profit.
    • 30% of what? If private grocery stores drop their prices/profits to be competitive, will these municipal stores drop their prices again? I would think a set profit rate for a municipal store would cut out price gouging, but allow private grocery stores to continue operations.
    • What are actual profit margins that grocery stores in the city are running on? Many articles say 1-3% profits are typical for grocery stores. Is this true for NYC?
    • Is this expected to a budget expense or a self funded operation after the initial investment?

    EDIT: To be clear I want this to succeed. Questioning the government’s implementation should be encouraged

    • Duckingold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      The details aren’t all there yet, but potential options:

      • scalping - put an upper limit order value or max number of an item in place. You can’t completely remove scalping, but if they can maintain stock, there isn’t a real need to go to a scalper.
      • 30% of what is the current grocery price. If other stores drop their price then I would expect the price differential will drop but the objective will be met then.
      • Odds are the municipal store won’t compete on every item, but more the essentials. I’d expect it to look more like an Aldi than a store with 60 options. Lower prices should cause higher turnover of perishable items and lower variety would minimize hitting expiration dates. Shrink is where a lot of profit is lost in grocery stores, so it’s a good thing to target. Municipal store should also be able to use some government beuracracy (food stamps, food banks) already in place to have lower overhead.
      • it should be able to be self funded but realize it will likely start linking together food security programs (food stamps, wic) which would look like it is getting extra gov funding even though the tax burden wouldn’t change.
    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Scalping. What is preventing people from buying out the store in bulk and reselling outside the store for a profit.

      Others can just go to the store.

      30% of what?

      One assumes these stores are not trying to generate profit. Logic implies that the prices are being compared to other stores.

      Your other questions don’t interest me enough to look further, but I’m sure someone will.

      • apftwb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Others can just go to the store

        Other people going to the store doesn’t stop scalpers from clearing the shelves. If they restock overnight, scalpers can and do wait for stores to open just so they can clear them out.

        Logic implies that the prices are being compared to other stores.

        Imagine this scenario. Private grocery store (PGS) sells bread for $5 a loaf. Municipal grocery store (MGS) sells bread for $3.50. PGS decides to cut their profits margins (citation needed) and sell at a competitive $3.50. MSG sells bread at $2.75 (after all this is 70% of 3.50). This repeats until the PGS goes out of business and the operating cost of MSG is much higher than expected.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Stores are often easily able to put a limit per transaction. I don’t think a scalper is going to go through the till 500 times to clear the store of its 1000 jugs of milk limited to 2 per person.