• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

    They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

    Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It’s sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they’ve somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says “No” to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it’ll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

      You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

      They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they’re pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that’s exactly what they want us to do… They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn’t. And that’s where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we’re nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          If you aren’t willing to kill them then they will inch forward until they win. That is why civil wars have existed.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Violence isn’t the only way to fight fascism. It’s surely a way. But the courts and the school districts are two early battle grounds where folks are already pushing back (non-violently) and preventing some of that inching forward.

            • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              29 days ago

              Preventing some, some of the time, is how you get here, inch by inch, and eventually earlier wins become future losses.

              • witten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                Look at it this way… We have a portfolio of tools to fight fascism. Sometimes, yes, the proper response to a specific incursion is direct action. Sometimes you can accomplish more with other means (fighting back in the courts, etc.). It doesn’t have to be all or nothing, and in fact I’d argue you accomplish the most by picking your tools wisely for each battle.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        There are only two tried and true methods I am aware of to stop fascists:

        1. Killing them
        2. Making them kill themselves

        I’m going to enjoy seeing this comment get removed. I’ll think about it as I’m put on the train to the death camp.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Trump is the candidate during next election

      Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

      He wins enough red States to have a majority

      They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

      The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

      Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
      He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It’s cute how so many in the comments think the legal checks will prevent this. They don’t care about the law or the Constitution in the same way they don’t care about optics, hypocrisy, decorum, or process. People keep viewing this through the lense of American democracy. None of that matters to fascists.

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      29 days ago

      They care about the law the same way the nazi’s cared about the law until the night of the long knives. I suspect their mass deportation plan is really them gearing up for the night of the long knives 2.0.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Night of broken glass comes first.

        Wait for them to loot and pillage “immigrant” owned businesses.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      29 days ago

      After four years of them being in power, he’ll probably just be able to…not leave, regardless of any election. Who would stop him?

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        29 days ago

        Presumably someone with better aim than the last shooter.

        I’d be very careful as a wannabe dictator in a land with this many guns. The next four years are going to be tense for everyone.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      I can’t like this comment enough!!! When will we learn they DON’T PLAY BY THE RULES. If the magats want this to pass, they will manipulate, intimidate, bend, or break the rules to do it. This is how coups happen. They don’t sit down and ask nicely, they just DO IT and back it up with military force if they have to.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      They care so little they’re trying to get an amendment passed… wait.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    29 days ago

    “It is imperative that we provide President Trump with every resource necessary to correct the disastrous course set by the Biden administration,” Ogles said in a statement

    so Biden created a bad situation for him in 4 years, yet he thinks Trump needs 8 years to undo it. Sounds like a skill issue to me.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    In order for it to pass, they need 290 votes in the House. The Republicans currently have 220 votes, so they would need 70 Democrats to flip.

    Then it goes to the Senate where they need 67 votes. First, 60 to get past the inevitable filibuster, and with 53 votes, Republicans need 7 Democrats to flip to move it forward and 14 to pass it.

    Then, the fun part, they need 38 states to ratify it. Trump did win 31 states, so he would still need 7 Harris states to ratify an amendment.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    29 days ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      29 days ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      29 days ago

      That’s basically what I’ve been posting on Social Media anytime shit like this happens.

      “How does this lower grocery prices?”

      Ask whenever the Right or Center is listening, keep the message on “Trump is distracting you from what he isn’t doing, but should.”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Thank you for saying grocery instead of egg. So many people say eggs and it is going to age like milk when the bird flu recedes even though groceries will generally still be expensive otherwise.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • psud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Trump, if anything, is much less smart than he appears. The guy managed to bankrupt a casino. That takes a special kind of stupid.

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      29 days ago

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms…

      Obama served 2 consecutive terms so would be ineligible. They literally wrote this so that only Trump would be eligible.

  • DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    A constitutional amendment required 2/3s House and Senate AND 3/4 of states. And they don’t have that. This is more bullshit to distract.

    To amend the U.S. Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by a two-thirds majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures (38 out of 50 states). Alternatively, an amendment can be proposed by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures, but this method has never been used.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is more bullshit to distract.

      This is saying it louder for the people in the back. Musk’s Nazi Salute isn’t getting the message across? Okay, how about this?

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        29 days ago

        They so desperatly want a hidden militia to come out of the woodwork and coup the country for them

        Those people are either dead from covid, too old to fight for their coup, or are just LARPers and actually aren’t interested in dying for a con man.

        • psud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          The ones Trump let out of prison were willing to do violence, including killing police officers. They’re a credible threat.

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Probably confused as hell watching the democrats refusing to drop gun control as part of their platform after an attempted insurrection and police violence repeatedly happening with no justice system reform.

      But the blue conservatives were never really about representing people. What else did I expect?

      ‘Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary’ - Karl Marx

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    30 days ago

    Do they really expect their orange beanbag leader to still be alive in four years? And if he still is, to still be able to know his own name or speak coherently in public?

  • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    29 days ago

    From the article:

    Ogles’ resolution is tailored specifically to permit Trump to serve a third term, but not to allow three out of the four living former presidents to serve third terms.

    It’s a Trump only privilege which, given the track record, could have been assumed, unfortunately.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    29 days ago

    Trump is not exactly a spring chicken. He is one mild medical event to being in the history book.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      29 days ago

      COVID nearly killed him and RFK is antivax sycophant. I’m not a betting man but…

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Great, than we end up with Vance aka the young, healthy, couch-fucking, monarchist who lacks Trump’s compulsive need for worship.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Vance used to be the face of Never Trump, which makes his actual motives a mystery. The best possibility would rely on him pulling a long con, but so would the worst possibility.

  • aarRJaay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    29 days ago

    FTA" “Trump “has proven himself to be the only figure in modern history capable of reversing our nation’s decay and restoring America to greatness, and he must be given the time necessary to accomplish that goal,”” - He hasn’t don’t anything yet!! How has he ‘proven himself’