ObjectivityIncarnate

Missing in the post’s title, but not the article’s title. No ambiguity there:

Republican Mayor Wesley Dingus charged after ‘sniffing underage girl’s underwear’ on camera

Why miss the opportunity to say “bigly,”

Because the goal isn’t to sound stupid?

Dug a bit, and apparently this seat has literally never been held by a Republican; this is quite the misleading headline.

Her name is “Chasity”, by the way, not “Chastity”.

18 point swing sounds great, but the ‘post-swing’ percentage is 51% thinking he’s doing a worse job than Biden, which isn’t actually all that encouraging, imo.

Also, apparently the prior poll that’s the other side of the ‘swing’ is one that was taken just after he was inaugurated…isn’t that kind of a stupid time for a poll asking ‘do you think the President is doing a better or worse job than the last President’, just as he begins his term?

This article’s source is the Daily Mail…

Is this what we’ve been reduced to? Soon as it says something you want to be true, now the Daily Mail is magically a bastion of journalistic integrity?

Holy confirmation bias.

I sympathize with the situation, but it’s scummy/clickbait-y of the headline to imply the kid was transported apart from any family members. It would have been trivial to add “and her father” to the headline, but it was deliberately omitted to influence the emotional response.

That’s not respectable journalism.

Why link this article instead of the CNN article all the info actually came from?

A batch of private GOP polling data obtained by Axios revealed that President Donald Trump’s mass deportation policy is wildly unpopular with independent and undecided voters

Bullshit clickbait:

1. The headline is clearly trying to imply that Republicans are the ones not supporting the policy
2. No sign of Trump ‘panicking’ whatsoever

Where exactly does any of the sourced material show that the opinion “Republicans are too obsessed with trans people” is being held at all, much less among what proportion? How is “too obsessed” even defined?

That headline is infested with weasels.

The media can’t legally say “murder” unless/until there’s a conviction. So it’s either “alleged murderer” or “shooter”, and they definitely chose of the two, the one that ‘safely’ implies more guilt.

One can’t really reasonably fault them for that choice, if one believes in his guilt, which you obviously do.

I wouldn’t hold my breath for this to happen even if the Democrats do win, lol

For some reason my eyes jumped from

What a B. Well

straight to

Well we will cause we’ll

and I thought I was losing it for a moment, lol

I feel like people have completely forgotten that Kamala was at like 3% when she bowed out of the primaries.

deleted by creator

What do you make of this?

Ok I agree it is very suspicious that Congress suddenly got their shit together for this one thing. But people keep doomposting this bill without actually reading it. And it deserves to be read in all the beautiful airtight glory that it is.

Massie and Khanna anticipated every single excuse DOJ normally uses to bury sensitive records, and they wrote the law to shut all of them down. To be clear, the DOJ will still try to hide, but it’s going to fail.

Here’s what the bill actually does:

They can’t hide anything for “embarrassment,” “reputational harm,” or “political sensitivity.”

That’s an explicit statutory ban. No shielding Trump, Clinton, Gates, etc. The law literally forbids it.

The argument of “Everything will suddenly be classified!” doesn’t work either.

The bill forces DOJ to declassify to the maximum extent possible and if anything stays classified, they must publish a public unclassified summary for each redaction.

That’s not optional.

“New investigations” don’t block release.

The “active investigation” exception is temporary, narrow, document-specific, and requires a written public justification in the Federal Register.

You can’t just open a random investigation and hide whole categories of documents under this bill.

The best part? Congress still gets the full list of names.

No matter what gets redacted publicly, DOJ must give Congress an unredacted list of every government official and politically exposed person named in the files. No exceptions. Not for classification. Not for investigations. Not for national security.

And enforcement is real. This is a mandatory “shall release” statute. If DOJ drags its feet, it goes straight to D.C. District Court, which has zero patience for agencies abusing secrecy laws.

This isn’t a symbolic transparency bill. It’s one of the tightest, most loophole-proof disclosure laws Congress has ever passed — which is exactly why all of their objections on the GOP side were never successful or just weak attempts to attack a statute that defines CSAM.

People can be cynical all day, but the text is the text.

And the text is a brick wall against the usual bullshit.

This seems alright, no?

The executive order directs the HHS and the Treasury and Labor departments to ensure hospitals and insurers disclose “actual prices of items and services, not estimates” and take action to ensure “pricing information is standardized and easily comparable across hospitals and health plans” including prescription drug prices.

Biden granted Harris extended protection for whatever reason.

Do you know how long the extension was for? For life also, or just a longer duration?

Anywhere the actual memo can be read? If it was leaked, let’s see it. Personally, I’m not interested in a given website’s ‘interpretation’ of a document I can’t also reference directly, I want to read it myself.

He said “never”. Not sure why you’re interpreting it that way.

True or not, he’s clearly asserting that he never went, not that he turned it down once but accepted other times. He’s not admitting to ever having gone.

So if/when proof comes out that he did, this will be more damning.

I mean technically a “penis” that small isn’t a penis.

Weird to just throw body shaming in here for no real reason, lol.