I don’t know if I’m going crazy but looking at the current situation in the world … please tell me that I’m overexagurating

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s bad for certain parts of the economy and it is dangerous for current rulers.

        • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Economy is cyclical, always either heading into a recession or coming out of a recession. A capitalist society requires constant money flow for expansion which is why interest rates are lowered during recessive times to stimulate expenditure and raised during peak to control expansion. World wars put spending into overdrive.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The situation today is nowhere near as bad as the Cold War.

    Think of it this way. All of the 0.01%ers in china, USA and Russia share the same tastes and values. Think any of them are really hot to blow up their nice places on the Rivera?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I’d tend to agree. The war is digital and economic. Countries are hacking each other’s infrastructure and commercial systems, mass propaganda and spying with troll farms, tiktok and even hardware. Plenty of fighting with sanctions, tariffs, bans of sales of technology.

      Fighting for land right now is really unnecessary, however depending on how well humanity survives climate change I’d expect to see some arguments going in to drilling and mining places like Greenland, the arctic and antarctic. China is already setting up shop in Antarctica.

      We are also all tied together economically in so many different ways that a war between major powers would be economically devastating for everyone before the first shot is fired, particularly for the countries that ceded most of their production to other countries that might be hostile in war.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anything could happen of course, but I don’t see this as a likely scenario myself. What’s more likely is that we return to bloc competition similar to what we saw during the Cold War. Except this time it’s going to be G7 against the BRICS.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    When Trump was elected again I spent about 3 weeks living with an existential dread I’ve never in my life felt before.

    Whenever it happens, it is coming.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Star Trek says that we shouldn’t expect World War 3 until 2026, so we’ve got 1 more year to live to the fullest before then.

  • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    You never really know, it’s plausible. But I doubt it. It doesn’t seem any more likely now than it did in 2016.

    Ceasefire in Gaza for a minimum of 6 weeks (if I understood the news correctly) is huge. That conflict might be close to over if we’re lucky.

  • folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I would say world war is still years away, but if SK in your name means slovakia then comfort yourself that you might find yourself in the early BRICS block vs US empire wars, so hopefully it’ll be over without too much war in your country soon.