• DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    LED light bulbs were supposed to last a bajillion hours. When they came out around 2010-ish they were still expensive and I spent many hundreds of dollars replacing every single light bulb in my house, thinking I would basically never have to replace a light bulb again.

    It’s 2026 and I now replace the LED bulbs in my house almost as often as I replaced incandescent bulbs. Seriously? LEDs are solid-state technology. There are no moving parts, no gases, no hot filaments…

    I understand that it’s probably on purpose; if everyone replaced all the light bulbs in their house with LED bulbs that lasted basically forever then who would buy more light bulbs from light bulb manufacturers.

    But it’s still just dumb. Either LED technology is flawed, or our economic system that incentivizes a constant cycle of replacing bulbs is flawed. This should should not exist in 2026.

    • fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Oh that’s a fun one. Original incandescents lasted a very long time. Too long (over 10,000 hrs, and there are many examples of ones that have been lit for decades!). The various manufacturers actually conspired(spent a lot of money on research and development) to a 1,000 hr operational benchmark. Profits exploded.

      This is common (engineered predictable fault.)

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Something is wrong with the ones you’re buying, then.

      Studies show that they do, on average, last dozens of times longer. Personally I replace them way less often than incandescent.

      I suppose the earliest ones were worse and there are definitely garbage ones out there. And even good brands have a did here and there. And if you have poor/inconsistent power, or placing them in hot, enclosed fixtures, they don’t perform as well as they could.

    • Clocks [They/Them]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Buy dimmer, filament style LEDs. They don’t burn themselves out hy heat at least.

      Otherwise you’re facing planned obsolescence.

  • anon6789@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    When I was a kid in the 80s I thought we’d absolutely have some kind of moon base by now. More space stuff in general. What is more “future” than space?

    Green energy is maybe 10 years behind where younger me would have wished it to be, it feels we’re close to some big breakthroughs. I’m still hopefully to see some game changing things in my lifetime.

  • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Realistically?

    • Housing that doesn’t cost a fortune

    • Healthcare that doesn’t bankrupt you

    • Food that’s both affordable and worth eating

    None of it is futuristic. All of it feels further away than ever.

  • eightpix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago
    • Genetic-level diagnoses and treatments.

    • Inexpensive, rapid genome sequencing.

    • Commonplace genetic counselling for more than just pregnancy.

    • Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

    • Cloned tissues (i.e. blood, skin), organs (i.e. heart, lungs, kidneys) for transplant or repair.

    I graduated university the same year the Human Genome Project first published completion. Certainly, that project uncovered more questions than answers.

    Also, we’ve done an absolutely garbage job of becoming appropriate stewards of this technology. Primarily, today, it would be used to identify, segregate, subjugate, and eventually kill a portion of the population.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

      I feel that for laws to exist, you first need some accidents to prompt the public outcry to get them passed. And accidents in genetics are going to be very messy indeed

  • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Better general medical science. So much of what we use is very old tech. We still can’t regrow cartligage. We still pin bones together with titanium screws. We still mostly use fiberglass casts (though better alternatives exist). We still catch the common cold.

    • folaht@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      When I went to the hospital for a broken bone, I thought this tech was already there since tech was advancing so quickly, going from Pac-Man to Super Mario 64 in 16 years.

      My vision:
      ‘At the very least I’ll get to see a 3D image of my broken bone and maybe there’ll be ‘dentist chair tools’ that can straighten and fill up the bone like a dentist does with your teeth. I mean, we advanced a lot in computer technology right?’

      The reality:
      ‘Here’s your 1950s X-ray picture. You see that Rorschach test blotch? That’s where it’s broken. We’ve done our job, have a good day!.. Your visit is over!.. You can leave now!..’

      That was 30 years ago.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I thought VR/AR would be farther along. There was a pitch 10 years ago that VR would be the “final platform” in that anything a phone, TV, tablet, or computer could do could be easily emulated in VR.

    Unfortunately it’s still all walled gardens. Also nobody wants to wear that shit for more than an hour.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      More specifically I thought one of the approaches to an omni-treadmill would catch on enough for an at-home model to be available to the public.

    • mangaskahn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Brain implants are progressing, so I’m still hopeful to see full-dive VR in my lifetime. Also scared of how it will be enshtitfied.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I too thought self driving cars would be further along. It just seemed like they were already decent… so 5 to 10 more years… and we are not much further. We have self driving cars in some select cities, but they still struggle even then.