Lab-grown meat can’t come fast enough.
I’ve never seen it being sold in the supermarkets,
but I agree with what one tv show host has said it best:
“Why would anyone have more contanimation concerns of meat grown in a clean lab when this person eats meat cultivated in a dirty stall with poop on every wall?”

For imitation meat, the stuff that’s cheaper is not better.
It’s cheaper nonetheless.
And the only better-than-the-real-thing imitation meat out there is a more expensive hamburger.

Greed.

Religuous extremism is already on its way down and unlikely to ever go up again.

Just curious, why are you asking?

And how will Californians and New Yorkers be able to afford a new home next year?

Why do US media companies find it obligatory to call the Special Military Operation a “full invasion”?

A) There’s never been a plan to invade the Western half of the country.
B) they never do so with Israël’s invasion of Palestine, NATO’s invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, which ARE a full invasion.

Do they get paid by the CIA for this?

China has become a superpower surpassing the US and sells Russia an abundance of inexpensive high-quality goods and exchanges high-quality military technology. This allows Russia to fight with higher tech weapons in greater quantaties on their doorstep. The EU thought it was going to be another Iraq/Afghanistan where the US would do the heavy lifting, waltz in and then the EU would chime in by patrolling areas.

So dumb people who can’t do multiplications, but can count months, won’t panic.

On a more serious not, most people skim the headline, read “three times” and think
“Wow! There’s some work to do!” instead of
“Twelve times!? Then Russia is winning. Wait, Russia is winning?
Why is this newspaper not stating that Russia is winning?
There’s no way Ukraine can win with one bullet versus twelve.
Shouldn’t this be a giant issue?
Why is there no giant debate on this?
Why is my newspaper demanding a debate on this?
Should Ukraine even continue to risk sending its soldiers to fight a war
where the enemy has twelve times the amount of ammo?”

Oligarchs and their bootlickers

US/UK/EU/AU/NZ Media:

“Taiwan is freedom and democracy.”
“China is authoritarian. (Shows footage of police retaliating against ultra-aggressive Hong Kong rioters or journalists doing reporting on the middle of a busy road or someone’s garden before being ushered away by traffic cops or security)”

Done.

I’m going to agree with you here.
I put Mandami left of center until I rethought
on what I often see and hear from the center-left,
and words often used by the left.

“I don’t think we should have billionaires” sounds very much left-wing to me,
rather than center-left.

Well, when I look at the party’s stances of my country I see a pattern in terms of type of language used,
so maybe one can use that to model how right or left wing one is instead of using some arbitrary
policy like gun laws as a measuring tool.

Hmmmm… those are articles about him.

Does Zoltan have a written election program?
Perhaps by the tone of language I might be able to better tell on what wavelength Mandami is,
compared to the Dutch political parties.

Although I will have to adjust the translation a bit,
to retain the type of language used,
so for example I adjust the translation
in order to keep the language strong,
where strong language is used.

I’ll post an example…

Extreme/Far-right stance on housing (first paragraph)

Our housing crisis keeps getting worse and worse.  
While the Constitution tells us that the government must provide a sufficient amount of housing,  
the reality is that an increasing number of Americans can't afford a roof over one's head.  
This US government completely failed.  

I wonder if Zelensky signed that deal knowing this would happen.

Go to very deep cave. Then write down “资本主义每一次都会导致法西斯主义”

You’re born female.

Rutte is a Dutch lib.
US leftists are irrelevant unless they reform or topple their regime,
with the former being the more unrealistic option.

You made it sound like anything changed.

I remember it and it’s still the same with the only two differences now being that for one the
voices of the democratic socialists are slowly going back to their roots,
becoming more and more anti-NATO.
And two, the fearmongering is now geared towards Russia.
Rutte’s bootlicking and increasing EU’s military budget while buying US equipment is not just what Trump wanted,
but the Euro libs as well.

I’ve had him as prime minister of my country for many years, so this is no surprise.

Don’t know about any of it, but I’ve had Rutte as my prime minister.
This reads like the way he talks and thinks.
The biggest strength of Rutte is that he’s a chameleon,
so there’s no telling what he actually thinks,
but considering his party allegiance it’s pro-NATO through and through.

Really?
I’d say it hits it completely on point the way Rutte is, an anglophile that doesn’t want to rustle too many feathers unless it’s against leaders of countries outside of NATO.

His party is super-pro-Israel and super-anti-Russia.
What’s he gonna complain about?

I can tell you as a Dutchman, reading this I could hear Mark Rutte’s voice and it aligns with his anglophile suck-up character.
I couldn’t see him writing it any other way.