More than free, easily accessible. I would argue access is probably more important. And with better access to getting an id should be better access to government assistance for people who need it. But I know… I must be a dirty socialist or something. Cause empathy is our greatest weakness.

Doesn’t matter what you do, Republicans will claim some BS and their voters will believe it. Let’s just do things because it is the right thing to do.

Yes and no. The issue is really with the difficulty and time it takes to get these ids. Not to mention the expense. The poorer a person is, the less likely they are to have the correct id. And make no mistake, the Republicans know this, and they know that poor people favor democrats. Same with mail in voters. So their effort to make this rule is not one of common sense, but stratrgic value. They are just trying to put up obstacles that making voting hardrr for people who don’t vote from them.

And really, what should be addressed is the difficulty of getting id. But noone wants to pay for that. This causes some people to have to travel significant distances on our meager public transit system which can take many hours to go 15 miles. And again, the poorer a person is, the less likely they are to have a car to drive, or the money to uber, or the time away from work to get to these places and even attempt to get the id.

https://www.voteriders.org/analysis-millions-lack-voter-id/

This may be our time.

People keep saying his administration ignores the courts completely. But this is another case where they chose not to openly defy the courts. They push the line as much as they can, but they seem unwilling to blatantly cross it.

Hm, is calling a judge a radical left lunatic an official act. Turns out only the court gets to decide. However it probably isn’t strictly illegal sadly.

Interesting idea. Someone in Ukraine could make an app to help make it all come true.

I got kids. :( also I am not very “accurate” or even knowledgable of the required implements.

Could someone please take one for the team and end all this.

Not possible. Nature finds a way.

If I was this guy I would have moved my family like they were in witness protection. The chance of them being collateral damage is just too high.

Though he referred to walking his daughter like walking a dog. So he probably doesn’t care much.

The democrats and thier party have been bought and paid for. They aren’t going to save us from the billionaires.

Better than 70+. But he will be 64 at the time of the election. That means 68 at the time of the next one if he wins. I thought we were trying for younger presidents. Can we aim for someone in thier 50’s?

It’s all a shell game. Upper management mainly exists to infuence other upper management. “We are talking to thier CXX, so they must be serious about a deal…” kinda crap. A company could have a far superior product, but if they have a less known and influential C-suite, they will lose to other products. In the end it is all about trading favors amongst the elite. If business decisions were just about products, we wouldn’t need all these upper management shills.

It’s all a shell game. Upper management mainly exists to infuence other upper management. “We are talking to thier CXX, so they must be serious about a deal…” kinda crap. A company could have a far superior product, but if they have a less known and influential C-suite, they will lose to other products. In the end it is all about trading favors amongst the elite. If business decisions were just about products, we wouldn’t need all these upper management shills.

I think they need to lookup the word “ambushed”.

Remember, he is only immune for official acts. And the courts reserved the right to determine if an act is official. I think they could easily say that openly defying the courts ruling is not an official act. They will wait for something bigger I suspect, but the supreme court judges love power just as much as trump. They are probably excited by the prospect of expanding thier power by giving trump the boot.

This is the truth of it. Picking up $100 bill off the ground in public that isn’t yours isn’t actually illegal. And what trump is doing is attempting to stretch the powers of his office. This isn’t anything new really. Just how he is doing it, how much and how fast is new.

Did you actually read that. A lot of “potentially”, “possibly” and things like that. In short, it isn’t all that clear cut.

Which laws. Cause I haven’t seen any quoted anywhere. And, they only gave him immunity for official acts. Then said they (the courts) get to decide what an official act is. Lastly, they did not take away congress’s ability to prosecute him in the form of impeachment.