https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    the single person who voted no: “In the opinion of the chair the nos have it”

    the multiple people who voted “yes” laugh at the absurdity and call him out on it

    how fucking brazen a liar

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 days ago

          I feel like this would be a great addition to congress. Make C-SPAN interactive and viewers can vote on whether or not to have someone involved in a proceeding flogged with something like a 90% majority.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            It would be like the scene in The Simpsons (a really old episode) where the family goes in for group therapy and the counselor hooks them up with shock collars and buttons they can zap each other with, and they just go crazy shocking the shit out of each other.

            Found it.

          • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            Imagine the vote manipulation. Now you have to worry about getting a virus on your phone that will silenty vote to beat up a member of congress

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The video was fun to watch to watch.

    If my understanding is right, it just means this sub committee will now subpoena all documents. Not like it will be available to everybody, just available to the lawmakers. You must be a real pedophile-ophile to want to block your committee from having knowledge.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 days ago

    sooooo GOP chair who blatantly tried to defraud the American people in a cushy government position by abusing his position, he’s tossed outta the swamp now, right?

    or rather, into the new swamp down in Florida

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    Can someone explain to this non-american why the Democrats are treating this as a successful upset when they could have released the Epstein files during Biden?

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t see anyone saying this yet, but the Epstein files were sealed by a court order for Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of 2025. Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them - and possibly giving Ghislaine’s lawyers a slam dunk to get her off with a mistrial.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they COULDN’T release them under Biden. They were sealed by court order until January 2025.

      There is a lot of desperate “both sides” nonsense going on here but the fact remains, Democrats are voting to release them and Republicans are not. If Democrats wanted to cover them up, why would they be doing that?

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they couldn’t, or at least not without potentially ruining the case while it was before the courts at the time?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Politik-brained Canadian here:

      IIRC they didn’t raid Epstein till 2019. In 2020 Democrats had a narrow majority in the house which they would lose in 2022.

      Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

      It kind of seemed inevitable that the Epstein files would get leaked or released eventually. That is until Trump officially ran again in 2023; creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently if he won.

      • Alloi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        just to tie on to this, theres a none zero chance some prominent democrat “old guard” are also on the list, and their positions are too valuable to be lost (to the status quo). january 6th, if it was enough, would have been a great way to protect the old guard and get rid of trump. but thats evidently not what happened.

        i dont care whos on the list, from what side, i want them all punished. anybody whos complicit in the current shit show, or is on that list, needs to be shot in the street like a rabid dog.

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          While I was still on Reddit, there was a list going around of politicians charged with child sex offences. Sure, there were a few Dems, curse them to hell, but by FAR the majority were Republikkklans. The list was up to page 57 last time I sighted it.

        • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          We just need the files. I’m sure there’s gonna be plenty of “I was just on it because he was blackmailing me” or whatever, from everyone involved, innocent or not. Unless there’s something that literally has itemized “X person, 2 kids, diddled both, camera footage timestamp x:xx:xx” I really doubt much legally will come from it.

          Court of public opinion however, that’s gonna cause some real shakedowns, if people actually listen.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Shhh! Don’t ruin it for the rest of us! On tomorrow’s episode of “As The Empire Crumbles”, will the files lead to anything actionable?

    • Dearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Attorney general under Biden, Merrick Garland, is a by the book liberal conservative. He assumed the treasonous actions of January 6 2021 would sink trump’s political career. He also believed - correctly- that the attorney general is appointed by a president to lead the judicial branch independent of the executive branch. Merrick focused the AG office on the January 6th investigation and didn’t publish the Epstein documents as they weren’t part of any specific case.

      There is also the theory that high ranking establishment Democrats are on the Epstein list. We also know that there are many pictures of epstein’s clients with underage girls that haven’t been published. Likely because American legal culture always seeks to punish the women involved in sex work and views the “johns” as victims who need to be protected

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list, also the general public on the US, if you haven’t caught on yet are like 30% complete idiots. A good example of this is that many people in comments on Instagram or other social media have said ‘‘why would anyone even willingly fly on a plane called ‘the Lolita express’?’’ Because they can’t figure out that the press started calling Epstine’s plane that long after the accusations and convictions were over with. They’re even more confused that the pilot of the plant never saw ANY sexual behavior or implied sexual relationship of any minors on the plane or even adults on the plane. How couldn’t he tell?! Because Epstine was a blackmail con man, not a ‘‘hay everybody here’s all my dirty secrets! Look at this! It’s incriminating!’’ Man. Blackmail necessitates obfuscation, and likewise gaining access to wealthy targets ment he ALSO needs to appear harmless and well connected to other wealthy people, who only saw normal behavior. So this list, the flight logs, even the island visitors, will all be at the very least 50% innocent people, if not way higher numbers. You only need a few successful targets to get by with blackmail and if the targets all have lots of money and know eachother the last thing you want is for them to be aware your blackmailing them all at once. And if he never did blackmail and just ran a pedophile ring, the level of secrecy would still be crazy high and he’d still want to look innocent to the majority of people he knew that’s how all child abusers and rapists in general tend to behave.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list

        Biden wasn’t able to release it because a judge sealed it as part on an ongoing investigation. Don’t let that stop your ridiculous conspiracy theories.

        The same “donors” would likely also support the Democrats now voting to release them.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m saying if he was still president, not in the past. also my whole point is that the list is half or more full of innocent names, but people at large won’t be able to grasp that, so it will paint otherwise innocent people as involved in a pedophile sex ring or trafficking, or as blackmail targets when they did none of those things.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released. The democrats that do, are the minority faction of progressives, and they don’t have enough political power to actually get them released. Biden is not a progressive, he wants the uphold the status quo, including, protecting the Democrats on that list.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released.

        That makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Why would they overwhelmingly vote to realease them then?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s all performative. You vote for something you know has zero chance of passing so you can go “Look! Look! I’m good! I did the thing!” in the next election cycle even if what you really did is nothing.

          See the 50+ votes to repeal Obamacare.

        • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’ll ask you this: Why didn’t the Biden Administration release it? Why did most congressional Democrats not demand the Biden Administration to release it? They had 4 years. Why demand its release now, now that they are out of power and they know that the current admin will never release it.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Who, me? look, all I’m saying is that the public at large can’t grasp that not everyone who walked past Epstein on the street is a full blow child sex trafficker. They will assume every single person he knew is full guilty when that’s just not how criminal conspiracy works, I wouldn’t be shocked to find only Him, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Trump were raping children.

  • webadict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hey, where’s all those losers that kept saying the Dems didn’t actually want it released? Come on out of the woodwork, ya fucking losers.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    Trust me bro one more rape charge on the rapist king and we beat fscist trust me bro. It will be a bombshell when everyone finds out what they already know and they SLAM him. One more scandal and we defeat facism trust me bro.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      That’s what really kills me about this whole thing. Dude has never, ever, ever faced a consequence for all the shit he’s done. I’m done hoping, man.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    A House Oversight subcommittee voted Wednesday to subpoena the Department of Justice to release the Jeffrey Epstein files.

    The motion passed by a vote of 8-2. Notably, three GOP lawmakers – Reps. Nancy Mace, Scott Perry and Brian Jack – joined with Democrats on the subcommittee to approve the subpoena, defying Republican leadership.

    House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer must sign the subpoena before it can be officially issued, per committee rules. Comer plans to sign off on the subpoena, a Republican committee source told ABC News.

    The top Democrat on the subcommittee, Rep. Summer Lee, initially offered the motion.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    3 Republicans: “I might be a racist, zionist(somehow), corrupt piece of shit that sits down when my fellow Americans are put into concentration camps, who is all for authoritarianism and white nationalism,… but I ain’t no pederass protector!”

    a what, Walter?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Just bottom rung people looking down on the only people left categorically worse than them.

      That’s why “chomos” need to be protected in jail.

      That’s why wanna be Chris Hansen’s are usually as creepy as the creeps they catch.

      That’s why violence posted online gets a free pass when its framed as a pedo getting btfu.

          • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s performative? So it won’t actually cause the “subpoena ALL the Jeffrey Epstein files” as the post says? My point is it’s just a little hard to see what the vote actually does from the context given, although I don’t doubt there will be political fallout from it.

            • This is deeper than I care to expound upon but the simple version:

              The democrats have been voted into a corner. They have almost enough power to be relevant but not nearly enough to prevent Republic卐n bullshit.

              So, while they get blamed for every atrocity the conservatives force upon us, they have no other choice but to make the votes illuminate the right’s hypocrisy.

              So, when they say they’re against something (Trump’s pedophilia in this case) and we all know that they’ll reverse course to please Dotard tomorrow, it’s nice to push the GQP into a corner and watch them have to choose the light.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m not american, does this committee actually hold the power to release them or is this just a recommendation/symbolic? If rule of law is followed (I know big if) does this guarantee the release or are there still hurdles?

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Me neither. It’s the house oversight committee. So it’s my understanding they do have some real power. Though to be honest I don’t know what the scope is.