Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make “the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity” a felony.

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,” she wrote. “It will be a felony offense.”

She added: “We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering.”

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

    So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      She will get reelected by the citizens of northeast Georgia because they vote.

      Do you?

      (More of a comment to the average reader, not an attack on OP)

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        She’ll be re-elected because her district is very white, very rural, and very disinformed by sources like Fox News, Newsmax, and conservative AM talk radio. On the rare occasions that the democrats bother to run someone in her district they tend to get less than 30% of the vote. And, if there were ever a danger that the seat might be close, the borders would be adjusted to ensure it stays safely Republican.

        The problem goes much deeper than voting or not voting.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      I honestly can’t tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

      I mean, I assume it’s chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a “I like the smell of forest fires, and you’ll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body.” Given the source.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        THEY will tell you when YOU broke the law. Then “deport” you to a private funded prison in a foreign country.

        They embrace the invisible. You have no defense against their claims.

    • Chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It would be beautiful if this dimwit bumbled her way into making the world a better place…but we’re probably in the wrong timeline for that

  • Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is awesome. Do it. What’s gonna happen when the contrails don’t disappear? Who are they gonna arrest? Gonna have to stock up on popcorn because the theatre of the ignorant is about to get really interesting. Finally a piece of legislation I can get excited about.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    All the fucking stupidest people. Every goddamn idiotic conspiracy theory is getting a pipeline straight to mainstream news outlets and a rep in government now. Instead of some stupid Bircher literature or having to stand out on the street and screech nonsense at passerby who could just ignore the crazy people…

    I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

    We already have the anti-vaxxer dumbfucks, the Qanon loons, the evolution-denying dipshits, what else is missing…? How about David Icke level bullshit about lizard people?

    JFC.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

      What is it about this current admin, and the secretary of HHS that makes you think that today isn’t already that day?

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I mean, literally getting that representation on that particular issue. Like when Marge is repping the HAARP and chemtrail type of nuts.

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

    • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s that psudo-science anyway? And I think only done in the rich parts of the middle east.

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can totally blast a cloud to make it drop out of the sky. I’m pretty sure we figured that out before airplanes

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not pseudo-science. The science behind it is solid. But, weather is very chaotic. It’s known to work to a certain extent, but it has relatively minor effects, it’s very unpredictable, has unpredictable side effects, and is fairly expensive. All you’re really doing is slightly boosting the formation of ice crystals in the clouds by adding a material that will hopefully produce more nucleation sites. It works in a lab, but how well it works up in the atmosphere is unknown. It probably does something, but it’s very hard to get an estimate of your “bang for the buck”.

        For example, Beijing tried it during the 2008 Olympics to reduce the chances of rain during the Olympic opening and closing ceremonies. There was a moderate chance of rain predicted to happen during the opening ceremony. The government launched more than 1000 rain dispersal rockets, and it didn’t rain during the opening ceremony. Did the rockets disperse the rain? Or did it simply not rain because that’s not how the clouds developed. Who can say?

  • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    She’s attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

    Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

    Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

    Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]