• Lenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lemmy users project their toxicity towards Reddit. This place can be quite hostile if you don’t echo the ‘correct’ ideals.

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    The purpose of government is to take care of the people. I’d rather pay more taxes to make sure my fellow men are fed, clothed, sheltered, educated and cared for because it improves security for my loved ones.

  • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I find it difficult to respect the way we exist in society. Most of us in the west enjoy what we have because someone elsewhere is being exploited. The general pride and vanity we have is unjustified and we should be using that power for good instead. We are focused on the right wrong things.

    You could say that this opinion isn’t unpopular, but just try bringing it up in conversation. Many don’t want to know.

    • verity@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      You’re absolutely right but where do we as privileged and I guess inherently exploitative westerners go from here. Also the entire neoliberaljst system seems to be set up as a exploitation pyramid, where even us the privileged westerners are being exploited for the gains of those monetarily positioned above us.

      Me I’m just trying to to understand all this so I can figure out where to go from there

      • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Good question. The first step with any endeavour is mindset. So when people ask “where do we go from here?” my first thought is that we should stop the glorification of exploitation. Stop wearing brand logos. Stop showing our new devices to people with enthusiasm. Stop celebrating the “winners” of capitalism.

        I don’t think we should despair - that doesn’t scale well. But we should (IMO) buy these things with a sense of regret or realism. We should normalise the discourse. I want us to be as up to date on this as people who follow sports.

        Otherwise, not only will we never think of ways to fix this, but we won’t even recognise the solution when it’s in front of us.

        We need to become conscious and informed of the dilemma of people who look different to us and consider them our brethren. That does wonders for the exploitative appetites we’ve developed.

    • Aitherios@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s not unpopular at all yet, highly hypocritical. “Feeling bad” is just a way to feel like you’re giving something back, without actually helping.

      • FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If we feel good about it, we’re primed to continue the dark pattern. The first step is acknowledging the problem. If you remove the first step, subsequent steps can’t happen.

        I get where you’re coming from. I see land acknowledgements used in colonies like NZ, Canada and USA yet treaties remain broken. I think (IMO) the answer is “all the things” rather than some. But we’re not even shuffling the deck yet as a population so making first steps accessible is important in my own experience. Too much in one go and peoples eyes glaze over.

        • Aitherios@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Of course, it’s important to do the first steps. But that’s the thing. 99% of the population will stick to that first step. I plan to help people when I can in the future, but, I need to help myself first. Tho, see society around me, I don’t see that happening. I need to get rich and the only way to be rich is to either sell something stupid, yet “hypnotizing” or, to be corrupted and doing illegal stuff (and if you don’t have connection, will get caught).

          People are dumb. Yeah, yeah, I know, everyone says that. But that’s another point. We are ALL dumb and especially weak af. Especially me! Cheers my friend!

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I have studied this greatly recently. Including strategies and methods to counter and create more symbiotic feedback loops. Game theory, zero sum outcomes, Nash equilibrium. There are loads of studies and detailed analysis on how all of this type of behavior works against us.

      It’s fascinating. Humanity has a long long way to go for where we think we should be FOSS and others. We are no where near the capacity of greatness we think we have achieved. Where we are now historically. It’s a facade. Smoke and mirrors on the grand scale. We are in a great transition right now.

      Time displayed in different information architectures is interesting and where the real deep learning happens. Not just time but information structuring in general. Time was just relative to this reply. We train deep learning on this. It’s heavy mental gymnastics.

  • LuckyPierre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    I prefer rap music by white artists because it’s less likely to feature the N word.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Jeez, this thread is scary, I forget how many crazy opinions people can have.

    Mine is probably that non-human animal lives matter, maybe not exactly in the same way that human lives do, but in a comparable and important way. I believe that murder is murder no matter the animal killed.

    And also a maybe close second (not really an opinion but you could argue that I’m too dark about it) is that climate change is far past the point of no return and that in 50 years we are all going to live extremely hard lives (if we even survive) that right now would seem like an apocalypse type fantasy movie.

    • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Climate change is not a lost cause. We are beating any estimates on wind and solar deployment, solar is cheap as fuck, and overall, were just no that bad off.

      • MTK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        To be fair, I didn’t explain myself. I don’t think it is a lost cause. I think that we’re already at a point where it’s gonna become apocalyptic. I think if we don’t do anything about it, it will become an extinction event.

        But, I will admit that the last few weeks have been super depressing and myi mnd ia probably not as objective as it can be about the future

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Find a European/Dutch deli if you’ve never been in one you might really enjoy what you find

  • pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Jack black isn’t funny at all. He’s worse, incredibly fucking irritating and annoying and a try hard. He epitomizes mainstream US “comedy”; obvious, loud, overstating the delivery of jokes with overwrought physical humor. He and Horatio Sanz must have studied under the same Sithlord. Can’t stand him.

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Becoming a parent is not a right, it is a privilege (I guess). You need a license to get married, drive, hunt or fish, your dog needs one. There should be some sort of class and background check you must pass before being allowed to procreate. Just the basics like: this is the level of care and support this small helpless mammal needs to be healthy and grow to maturity. This is how much, minimum, that quality upbringing will cost and do you meet that bare minimum level of competence and income to raise a healthy baby.

    • _Vedr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Who decides who can pro-create? What is the criteria?

      I don’t see a scenario where this works out well.

      • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I laid out some bare minimums: knowledge about how to take care of and raise a healthy human child and the financial means to do so.

      • Aitherios@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        How tf does this shitty reply have 17 upvotes? How the fuck did 17 COMPLETE IDIOTS show that and though: “Hmmm… He is right!”

        Like, hw stupid can you all be? Who’s going to decide? Obvious professionals who know of kids and have worked with them. Social workers, pedopsychiatrist, teachers, etc.

        This isn’t even something new. This is how it’s done with adoption. You can’t all be so ignorant and dumb. I hate democracy because of idiots like you…

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Ah, the age-old unpopularopinions dilemma. Do I upvote because I agree, or upvote because it is unpopular and I disagree?

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s not that hard i don’t think. Just ask yourself should other people see this comment?

            Upvote only if it’s an easy yes

    • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      One of the biggest problems would be enforcement of that license. With driving, cops are everywhere and regularly pull people over to check their license. With hunting, there are game wardens that patrol hunting areas and check the licenses of hunters.

      With procreation, people can have unprotected sex anywhere and typically in private. You’d either need to give some group of people permanent access to enter any private space at any time (to randomly check for unlicensed sex), or force everyone without a license to take birth control or be sterilized. Unfortunately, none of those options are ethical.

      • rainrain@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Create a reliable method via which fertility can be turned off and on. Turn it off by default.

    • arrakark@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I feel like the problem with this argument is that it’s consequentialist. You can never be 100% certain which parents will raise their children well. There’s no metric that will conclusively tell you.

      • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        But you can start them off on the right foot by making sure they have the knowledge and the means to do the job correctly

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The problem is that then you need the government’s permission to procreate. There’s always the valid concern that the government would prevent you from having children to remove some undesirable trait from the population and justify it as being a danger to a child. I know you described basic competency skills, but there would always exist a very credible threat of it being politicized.

      In fact, this already happens for things like queer couples being rejected for adopting children or the Uyghur population being quietly genocided in China. And Eugenics was historically practiced such that criminals would be sterilized as part of their punishment.

      It’s worth pointing out that governments already intervene with unqualified parents by removing the child from the household. Shifting the burden of proof from the government needing to show neglect to parents needing to prove themselves worthy is a dangerous amount of authority to cede to a centralized, corruptible power.

      Also, it’s not clear how you handle unlicensed parents. People are going to have unsafe sex no matter how illegal you make it. Would you push for preemptively sterilizing everyone and trusting it can be reversed after a license is acquired? Forcing abortions? Confiscating the child after birth?

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Also the amount of effort and wealth expended by the medical profession just so that some people can reproduce is mind boggling.

      • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Eugenics is trying to erase particular traits from a genome which is not, at all, what I stated in my unpopular opinion. I just would like people who are wanting (or whoopsing) a child into the world to have the bare minimum knowledge and tools to do the job “correctly.”

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      For all the reasons others have described, this is problematic. However, I propose a middle ground: develop permanent, reversible, side-effect-free birth control, and apply it to every child at 10 years old. When you turn 18, you can have it removed. You just need to show up at a government office, sign a form, and have the procedure completed. It is completely free, and you are out the door in an hour. The treatment can be reapplied at any time.

      What happens? No more accidental pregnancies. No more getting knocked up in high school. No more scares after one night stands. No more becoming impregnated by a rapist. Everyone can fuck to their heart’s content, but babies only get made if both people actually want a baby. Most of the problems you are talking about typically occur when either one or both of the parents don’t want or weren’t expecting a child. Make pregnancy opt-in, and you’ll solve 90% of the problems.

      • Aitherios@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s not middle ground. That BS! And it doesn’t even have anything to do with what OP said. It just prevents pregnancy.

        For fuck’s sake, I know people think differently and I try to accept and respect that but, some of you make me really wonder how tf we can think SO differently…

    • Steal Wool@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I didn’t really like the Beatles until I started listening to all the non-#1 hit songs.

  • Who knew?@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    too many dudes in this thread thinking eugenics and pedophilia are unpopular. They’re very popular and that’s a very bad thing

  • Ideonek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Digital Marketing doesn’t work. Digital Bubble is here and it will burst hard ending the “free internet” in a process. The more you work in marketing, the less you are inclined to agree… or even listen…

    This will not be preaty.

    • Lvdwsn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The type of people that are on Lemmy will generally agree with this, but let me just say as somebody with a wife and plenty of friends that are girls that digital marketing very much works, very much is effective, and you’re probably just not the target market. This, of course, is independent of your Digital Bubble remark, which I generally agree with. Also, not in marketing as a disclaimer.

      • Ideonek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        You are observing just one side of the equation: people who watched adds are using a product.

        You don’t see the other part that is the problem. Cos of running those ads is higher than a profit gained from additional sales.

  • Zippythezigzag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    COD sucks. The only good ones were world at war and the original modern warfare series. That’s it. All others aren’t worth a shit.

    Now before you respond, yes I know there are many people that agree with this, but with people I know in real life this is unpopular.

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have great memories of the first Call of Duty solely for its sound design. It elevated it above Medal of Honor.

      The franchise has been trash since after the OG Modern Warfare.

  • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Disabled people should have to ask for a seat on public transit if one isn’t available; other people shouldn’t immediately get up when a clearly disabled person boards, nor should anyone expect them to without being asked. Similarly, you have no right to criticize someone (who doesn’t appear to be disabled) if they’re sitting in a seat designated for disabled people and they don’t get up when a visibly disabled person gets on.

    First of all, the disabled person might not even want the seat. If they do, it’s reasonable to expect them (as an adult) to advocate for their own needs (i.e. ask). It’s actually more offensive to assume that every elderly or otherwise visibly-disabled person is incapable of that.

    Second of all, not all disabilities are easily visible. I’m a mid-twenties guy and I was born with an auto-immune disorder that sometimes makes it very difficult or painful to stand/walk. It’s happened multiple times that strangers on the bus have chewed me out for not giving up my seat, even though (statistically) there were probably other people sitting in disability-designated seats that needed that seat less than me and the visibly disable person who just boarded. I can’t fucking believe I have arthritis in my twenties, either. I’m just trying to cope with the shitty circumstances I was given and the last thing I need is to constantly have to justify myself to ignorantly self-righteous strangers.