Part 2: what if you found out their diagnosis 1 week after birth

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    If it’s ethical to abort just because you don’t want the kid (and it is), then it’s ethical to abort for any reason.

    Also, it’s no one’s business why people choose to abort.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 days ago

      it’s no one’s business why people choose to abort.

      This. The only answer to “why” is “fuck off”, and for so many reasons. It’d suck to agonize over the decision, and once it’s made to then be second-guessed by some rando.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      In my country it is legal to abort just because you don’t want the kid, but illegal to abort for a certain specific reason (the parents not wanting a girl). This is because people might abort daughters if they are poor and think that girls are less likely to get jobs.

      I feel that the Down’s Syndrome case is similar. There are people with Down’s Syndrome who lead happy lives, and genetically ‘normal’ people who lead miserable lives. So of course a mother has the right to abort a foetus. But I fear that if we normalise aborting children on genetic grounds, that could lead to eugenics.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I mean more like “is a life of suffering worth living and would a parent want that for their kid” rather than the ethics of abortion

  • BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s kinda besides the point. If a woman wants an abortion she should get an abortion. Downs syndrome or not, it doesn’t matter.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      I don’t mean in a her body her choice kinda way, I mean is it more ethical to let them live their natural life knowing that they would possibly suffer immensely vs not letting them live a life at all

  • Eczpurt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 days ago

    Can’t really say for part 1 but for part 2 it’s definitely not abortion anymore after birth so that is unethical in my opinion.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 days ago

    Doctor wouldn’t know how severe.

    Down syndrome is regular DNA but one extra copy that interferes randomly with the building of the body.

    Every kid is different.

    The doctor told us the fetus might have issues based on growth. We didn’t care.

    My son was born with down syndrome. The doctor we had said he may not talk much, may not move much, etc.

    He will talk your ear off. He graduated highschool with a modified plan. Got the Phys Ed award in the regular grade 12 program. He reads, writes, excels at video editing and PowerPoint creation, excellent at figuring out technical stuff to a degree. Highly social and works partime.

    His birth showed me that acedemics aren’t as important as enjoying life for what it is.

  • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I think it’s ethical to abort any baby. It’s parasitic on the host, if you don’t consent to the idea how is it any worse than getting a flu vaccine

    If you don’t think you can provide a better life for your kid than state care could I see putting it up for adoption to be ethically mandatory

  • sangeteria@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    I remember discussing this in an undergrad biomedical ethics class. Pls don’t ask us to do ur homework lmao

    Jury was still out by the end of class discussion btw. This one was complicated lol

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      I had business ethics so it was boring questions like “should we advertise to kids” or “do cigarette manufacturers have souls”. But ya this seems to be pretty divisive so far.

      • sangeteria@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Yeah it really splits the crowd. There were three case studies from the course but I can’t find my offering’s outline and I forget the third case study. The first one was: “A woman signs a form saying that if she gets dementia she wants euthanasia in the late/developed stages of the illness. Later, she gets there, but this ‘version’ of her has a really high quality of life and is quite contented. Do you follow through?”

        In between there were discussions of frameworks like Aristotelian/Kantian/utilitarian ethics. There were also some medical specific stuff, like the biopsychosocial model of disability. Pretty neat overall, though tbh I wish I took an ethics class more relevant to my current academic pursuits (math)

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    It is ethical to abort in the first part of the pregnancy. If tge fetus has a chance of disability or mental disorder.
    No one is ready to take care of a disabled person instead of a healthy child.
    It is ethical to give the child up for adoption (now tge adopter should be ready for the same problem).
    Also it is also ethical to keep it.

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    let me flip the question:

    if you KNEW the child you were going to conceive had the same chance of the same condition, would you still have sex?

    if you’d skip it, then i see no issues with an abortion.

    we don’t have foresight, but we do have hindsight. how we use it is important. nobody gets asked if they want to be alive. how dare anyone bring someone into a life of pain without their consent? part 2: if you don’t take responsibility for your own disasters, you are the disaster.

  • edel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    There are many factors to take this decision, but mainly in how long in the term is the fetus and the resources situation of the family (work, economic, external support, their health, etc).

    In an ideal world though, induced abortion should not exist since it is the society who should completely support, and adaptively to the children’ special needs, but when society fails at that and, so far, #all societies are, it is the family and doctor the only ones who should only make the decision on a fetus. The only argument today should be when a fetus becomes a human.

    We should treasure far more families that dedicate more than the usual percentage of resources to take care of their weakest of their members (children or parents) than basically anyone else in society like we do with youtubers, sport players, oligarchs, politicians, etc.

  • Xella@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    Part 1: yes, abort

    Pat 2: you’d have to be blind to not see that your child has down syndrome for a week. Not much you can do at this point outside of putting the child in the system to be abused and abandoned or murdering it so this is the point where I become stuck with a mentally challenged child.

  • Brokkr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Would it be ethical to knowingly give someone a 99% chance of a severe illness within a few months?

  • Faux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s not ethical to not abort the pregnancy in this case. There is nothing wrong with getting rid of the fetus, there is everything wrong with letting a person disabled to this stage from the start emerge.

    About part 2: I think euthanasia is ethical in this case. Certainly more ethical than emotional blackmail with “unborn child”.