• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s worse, this is Nixon and the EPA all over again.

      Or Obamacare even.

      They know it’s unavoidable, and if they don’t act something effective might finally happen.

      So the oligarchs will pass something that says “tax billionaires” but absolutely no one will fall under it. When a progressive runs on “tax billionaires” everyone will point to this do nothing bill and say it’s already done.

      Taking the wind out of the movements sails…

      I’d like to say this shit should be obvious, but it’s clearly not for most people.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d like to say this shit should be obvious, but it’s clearly not for most people.

        Its almost as if decades of attacking education and critical thought was the first step in destroying our democracy or something.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            1969 people didnt have the total sum of human knowledge and infinite possibilities towards personal improvement and learning in their pocket.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, but they said 1909 people didn’t have national TV news…

              Not to mention the Internet only tells you someone noticed something, another way to look at that is they had more critical thinking than we do today, because they had to fill in the blanks themselves.

              It’s insane how many times I’ve out time into a comment pulling form multiple different areas, and someone’s just says “source” without any context. And a single link that looks like it backs one thing up, is taken as proof for everything.

              Just the concept that someone is putting things together is inconceivable to people, that expect one single article that “proves” everything.

              It’s really fucking dangerous when a society blindly accepts authority like that, even without a demented fascist running the show.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              yes, AI and the internet will save us all. Its the modern equivalent to DuPonts “better living through chemistry” slogan.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      the problem is that American evangelicalism has tied money and goodness together with the prosperity gospel.

      The more money you have, the more gooderer you are, and all you have to do is give all your money to (church/fund/whatever target) and god will give it back to you three-fold!

      and there for, being against money by wanting to tax people means you are big evilsatanbad.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    No way, really?

    The guy who changed laws for his rich friends is against his rich friends having to pay comparatively insignificant sum that wont hurt their dragon hordes or its infinite growth in any significant fashion?

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You mean this rich well connected individual isn’t going to burn their friends. You don’t say!

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That man is the definition of afflueza, which I hear is only cured by Luigi fever or something idk all the weird media labels confuse me

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    He had me at no a long time ago when he said he “reveres the state of Israel and is proud to support it”. The guy is corrupt trash and doesnt belong in the party at all. Kick his rightwing ass out.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    A statewide billionaire tax is stupid. All it will do is chase rich people out of your state. It only makes sense as a nationwide bill.

    • otterpop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not in an economy that’s the 4th largest in the world. California led the way with partial zero emissions vehicles and everyone followed suit due to simple economics. Sure, some people may move, but overall this is leading the way.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Taxing a handful of people literally nothing like forcing millions of vehicles to be built differently.