California Gov. Gavin Newsom called for a nationwide tax on billionaires as part of a broader “economic reset for America.”

Newsom, who is considered to be a 2028 presidential contender, also reiterated his opposition to a state-level wealth tax that Californians will vote on in November.

He also called for creating a “national public equity fund” to help “ensure every American owns a stake in the future being built by AI.”

  • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    How brave to insist one something he can’t deliver until after he is voted in as pres. I’d be more inclined to believe him if he actually supported the CA wealth tax

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This asshole brought on Sharpio and other right wing grifters to agree with on his podcast but won’t talk to real leftists.

    I’ve totally soured on his bullshit. It’s all just an intern clapping back at Trump in Twitter, otherwise this is just Hillary Clinton in a man’s body.

    Business corporate Democrat to the core.

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What an absolute fucking snake. He’s been opposing the billionaires tax in Cali and now he wants to say it should be national where there is no chance of passage?

    Fuck this guy.

  • LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Perfect democrat performative politics bullshit. It’s on the ballot in CA and he fought it the whole time lol

    Take the L Gavin

  • Hayduke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I believe, and this is as diplomatic as I care to be, that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state and that a national approach could prevent that.

    On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “I can’t tax billionaires in California, because they’d leave California”

      “I can’t tax billionaires nationally, because they’d leave the nation”

      “I can’t tax billionaires globally, because they’d leave the planet”

      There will never be a finish line in front of which these billionaire-class guardians won’t shuffle their feet, nor a goalpost that they won’t carry further. It’s some real “I’ll release my taxes after I get elected” energy.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      that he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state

      If they are not paying taxes anyway, why would that even matter?

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s not that they are providing $0 in tax income, it’s that it’s nearly 0%. It’s still a chunk of change.

        I’ve heard that we wouldn’t feel the impact for 25 years.

        Even so, kick them out. They can live in beautiful Houston Texas, or sunny Arkansas. Or maybe they will decide paying up is worth the cost of being a resident of California

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      he is perhaps concerned with billionaires fleeing the state and that a national approach could prevent that

      Not sure about his motivations, but we absolutely cannot be playing states off of one another to see who can bend over the hardest for the Epstein Class.

      Fuck that noise.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      once he become president he is going to champion a world billionaire tax and say no to a national one.

    • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      On the other hand it is more likely that his resistance to the CA tax and cheerleading of a national approach is purely performative as it will simply not happen at that scale, so that his pseudo-progressive veneer isn’t stripped away.

      The idiots, aka 99%of voters, will only remember him promoting the national billionaire tax.

  • Furbag@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Californians are proposing a billionaire tax and he promised to veto it.

    Also, we don’t want a stake in AI. We want to burn it to the fucking ground because it’s ruining everything right now.

    Newsom is such a duplicitous motherfucker.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Too little too late for Newsome. He’s had plenty of years to talk up a rich tax. Dude is capitalizing on the rhetoric. Like thanks but no thanks bud. We don’t need a yes man. Need someone with actual ideals

  • vladmech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So he’s against the state level one that actually has a chance of passing, but for a national one that has zero chance, neat.

  • Valentine Angell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This bowl of fuckwit oatmeal is going to be the DNC nominee for prez, isn’t he? We are soooo fucked!

    Can someone just nuke us or slam a gigantic meteorite into us? Just end it already, I’m tired of suffering under these fools and mouth-breathers.

    • HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Asteroid availability scan complete: one can be hurled your way now, will you be home to sign for delivery in 16 million years?

      😂🤷🏻‍♀️