There is a term for when government can break its laws. "Failed Nation’

  • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    28 days ago

    terrorism | 'terariz(a)m | noun

    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims

    Oxford Dictionary of English

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    28 days ago

    also, that’s not how Federal vs State jurisdiction works… check the 34 convictions the Orange Felon pedophile has

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    27 days ago

    I know it’s kind of surreal and that may make it hard to believe.

    But we’re dealing with actual traitors in control of our federal government. That’s actually happening right now.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Typical double-speak attacking a strawman position.

    Nobody is claiming that Federal officers don’t have immunity to perform their legal obligations and duties.

    The complaint is that they’re doing things that are not within their legal obligations and duties like trying enforce traffic laws and shooting people in the head.

    Or raiding an entire apartment building full of homes without a single warrant.

    Or throwing a flashbang into a car full of children and a 6-month old infant.

    Or shooting people in the face with grenade launchers leading to the loss of their eye.

    Or arresting people for being brown, or for not showing papers (which is so fascist that it is a meme).

    Or fabricating ‘assault on a federal officer’ charges (which will result in years in prison, everyone should remember this) by invading personal space and treating any brushing contact as if it were a thrown punch.

    Federal Officers are allow to perform their duty, they are not given completely immunity by virtue of their jobs nor are they given immunity to brutalize people who hurt their feelings or throw baloney on their cars.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    “If they resist in any way, you can kill them, and they will be no punishment.” Except that the people are the environment in which you exist and you must navigate for the rest of your life. See

  • LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    What a lame, weird little person Stephen is. He has no friends, no intelligence, and no looks. He is the epitome of failure in the human gene pool.

    This post means nothing, just like all the other illegal orders they have given.

  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Isn’t he the fascist who said the revolution would be bloodless if the “left” allows it?

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago
    "Should we fight back?"
    

    “No, that’s exactly what they want! Then they’ll start double fascism.”

    "Withhold taxes?"
    

    “No, they control the banks. And I’ve been a big fan of central banks since Hamilton. Let’s not risk a depression.”

    "So, should we just secede?"
    

    “No, then people in red states will get double fascism.”

    "Then what, exactly?"
    

    Slam them with shame until we maybe have a midterm election.”

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    Yes, to perform their duties. Where does it say beat and restrain US citizens in their duty list? Nowhere. I see. Act accordingly people. If they break the law, you have the green light to break it right back on them. Let God sort them out.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    Miller is only a mouth. Scrawny little cueball would never be able win a face to face with anyone