

We were cyberattacked and poor Kash Patel is the victim?



We were cyberattacked and poor Kash Patel is the victim?



Waiting for the “Whoops, we ‘forgot’ to remove it”.
Yeah, it’ll be horrible. We’ll have terrible art inflicted upon on us, for the first time in gaming history.


Let that expire right along with the ICE funding.


Just after we win the war that we already won on day 1.


Yeah, he’s still a Republican. This isn’t the same as the seat flipping but it’s always nice to see Trump’s influence become less and less effective.


essentially a manager game? but how does the multiplayer fit in? it can’t have the social depth a real mmorpg has
It reminds me of idle games.
Specifically, IdleOn (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvBFRDuNRoo). The progression is in progressing every character individually and also in ways that are shared among characters.
This just seems more WoW-like while IdleOn is MapleStory-like.
me rn

(The OP image hasn’t loaded for me so I’m trying to infer based on context and failing)
It’s like the interdimensional cable version of a post.
I know all of the words that are being used, but I have no idea why they fit together.



In the video game ‘black market’, boosting/carry services and selling accounts is big business. You can hire minimum wage employees in whatever country has the cheapest labor costs, throw them in front of a PC with aimbot software and have them escort customers for US $30/hr.


I’m sure the comment section is going to be full of well thought out comments and good faith discussion.


If it’s that controllable that’s pretty cool. I could see it being useful to do things that are normally expensive (like raytracing shadows on grass) but which don’t really matter if they’re altered a bit. Being able to exclude faces or important set pieces would be a big plus.
Not that it matters much for me, my next card will likely be AMD for Linux reasons.


You’re not crazy, you’re just reading a topic associated with AI and so it’s full of bots, their misinformation and outrage, and the idiots that are influenced by them.
Like all of these threads, we get these insane bad faith ‘arguments’, misinformation and heavy vote manipulation.
There are certainly valid criticisms about DLSS. It creates visual artifacts, it’s often used as a crutch by games to create performance, in the case of DLSS 5 the overall effect is weird as you’ve said. I agree with a lot of the complaints and I’ll probably enable DLSS 5 once and then go back to native… but I think that a lot of comments here are just ridiculous so you’re not alone there :P.


You don’t understand, once DLSS 5 is released into the wild then nobody will have a choice. It’s basically Skynet, the end of the world, Snow Crash, a breach in the Black Wall.
It will install itself the moment a person searches for Godot tutorials and nobody can ever disable it. It would be LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE (didn’t you see that they said ‘literally’?!) for an artist to control.
/s


The term slop is essentially meaningless.
It’s like people that ‘woke’ as an insult, it applies to everything they don’t like despite nobody having a clear definition of what it actually means.
To me, slop is the mass produced articles/videos created by generative and not ‘everything that is done with machine learning’.
Simply calling everything AI ‘slop’ is meaningless virtue signaling, like using ‘woke’.


Another important fact is that the President cannot pardon State charges or convictions (a future governor may be able to, not sure about MN law).


My target audience is people with 3+ neurons


I was not trolling, but I understand


Removed by mod


Removed by mod
This is the way.
Some people can’t and so the President’s planned disenfranchisement is going to work to an extent. I don’t believe the split favors them by much in the states that matter to the midterms. If only able bodied people voted I think they will still lose.
The other part of the disenfranchisement campaign, in the SAVE Act, is the requirement to have a bunch of current legal documents or a passport. This law will more strongly affect poor, young and married women voters… all demographics where Trump and Co. poll poorly.
I don’t think they’re getting the SAVE Act passed by the midterms so the most major hurdle that could possibly happen will be whatever comes out of the Supreme Court. A worst case scenario is that they craft some ruling that can be read in a way to effectively implement the SAVE Act’s strict documentation requirement and disenfranchise the poor/young/married women demographics without needing to pass a law.