• 0 Posts
  • 273 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2025

help-circle






  • He’s played well with rural Floridians.

    There’s a lot of Christians who hate that their faith is being twisted to promote a political agenda that doesn’t fit what they learn in church. They’re not as loud and strident as the hardcore culture warrior MAGA so they’re not as visible in social media, but they certainly exist in large numbers.

    Having a person with impeccable Christian bona fides who’s policies are more of a match to Christian teachings while also taking the populist position that Trump exploited.

    Like Mamdani, we can see the populist messaging on the left is massively effective even in the face of corporate media and social media botted viewpoints being pushed.


  • I see what you’re talking about and I think that is because he’s a veteran politician and knows the kinds of questions that will be asked so of course his answers are polished.

    I also think a bit of that is because he’s a ‘real’ christian, as in he practices the teachings of Jesus, goes to church, etc. There’s a certain cadence and style of speaking amongst seminarians that fits well into a church setting and politics (preaching to an audience that agrees with you).

    He’s a bit more off the cuff in other interviews that I’ve seen (including on some YT show where he’s talking with a bunch of undecided voters).

    I think we’re just too used to politicians who speak like they’re reading off of teleprompters and less used to people who can improvise effective speech without speechwriters and consultants.

    It’s not like he has a hard job he’s spreading the populist message that was so effective with MAGA under Trump: “The world is fucked up, the rich elites are at fault due to owning the government and only using it to enrich themselves” It’s a safe message that resonates, he fits the profile of a stereotypical rural Texan and doesn’t accept large donors (a fact that will separate him from Jasmine Crockett).


  • The topic of the thread is about users migrating away from Discord due to privacy concerns over their ID requirements. If this doesn’t apply to you, what is your purpose commenting? To tell us all that the thing in the OP isn’t actually happening?

    Your position is that:

    • this can’t happen,
    • people can’t leave discord because people are on discord,
    • it’s impossible to learn 3 applications,

    Therefore nobody would replace Discord with Teamspeak and also use some other chat program (that’s 2 programs! which is nearly as impossible as learning 3 programs!).

    You’re posting this opinion in a thread about users migrating to TeamSpeak and calling me the idiot?

    That’s certainly an opinion.

    Your a fucking delusional idiot.

    ‘Your’ is the possessive form of you.

    You’re is the word you’re looking for, as it is a contraction of ‘you are’ as in ‘you are an idiot’.


  • Voice chatting and streaming and text channels on the same client are an absolute must.

    Yes, those are certainly a convenience that would be nice to have.

    I just don’t think they’re “Be subjected to Discord” nice anymore.

    I’ll take on the burden of launching two executables and clicking two different windows in order to not be subjected to the endless monetization and privacy violations.

    Not everyone agrees, that that’s fine too. Using Discord (or Signal if your group is small and care more about privacy than open source) isn’t wrong, but some people see the downsides as outweighing the benefits.


  • Hey guys, stop moving on to the next commercial service who will do the exact same thing once they get up to critical mass.

    Yes, commercial services are easier to setup. The cost you pay is all of your privacy and your loss of control over the service that you’re building your communities on.

    Stop making this same mistake OVER and OVER and OVER.

    Take the time to find the IT workers or tech nerds in your community, take donations to rent server space and administer it yourself. Moving from Discord to Teamspeak isn’t an improvement, you’re just selecting the next group of people who will sell you out the moment that it becomes profitable.

    Use Free and Open Source solutions, that your community hosts themselves. You have Mumble (https://www.mumble.info/) for voice, XMPP (https://xmpp.org/software/?category=servers) for text chat, Discourse (https://github.com/discourse/discourse) for forums, or even setup a Lemmy instance.

    None of these things are difficult to use and the administrative side of things is simple (most are simply pre-made and hardened Docker containers). Even if you don’t want to deal with that yourself, there are managed hosts available for all of these pieces of software. If you don’t want to administer a Mumble server you can just rent one for less than the cost of a single Discord subscription. There are similar managed hosts for all of the other software.

    Every game that I’ve ever played as part of a large community has had forum software and voice chat that we’ve hosted ourselves. Discord killed all of that because they offered the same service for free and made it easier.

    Well, it wasn’t free, they’ve been steadily enshittfying and profiting off of the users. The prices keep increasing and they’re depending on the Network Effect (“I can’t leave because everyone uses it!”) to keep you trapped on their services.








  • He’s been in contact with Epstein, his names appears in the files (though, to my knowledge nothing directly incriminating), he’s a Trump lackey and a Fascist who seems to have no qualms about deleting the constitution in order to establish a Fascist Neo-feudalisim.

    Despite being a person that any civilized society would have seen tried and hang for sedition, I haven’t seen any ‘pedophile apologist’ material.

    But, this is social media in 2026. Once a person is labeled ‘bad’, no amount of lying, bad faith framing or misinformation is off limits. Any attempt to correct any misinformation is attacked and framed as if the person is ‘defending <insert some indefensible thing>’.

    So, to my knowledge, no he is not (though I have no read the millions of files personally). Despite being an otherwise odious human being who is working against the Constitution and despite running in the same social circles, I haven’t seen him attempting to defend pedophilia.