Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez holds a slight lead over Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical 2028 presidential matchup, according to a new poll.

The New York Democratic congresswoman, known as AOC, edges the likely Republican nominee 51% to 49%, in The Argument/Verasight survey released on Tuesday. However, the result was within the poll’s 2.7 percentage point margin of error, making the two candidates statistically tied. The poll asked voters who they would vote for if the election was between the two of them.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Shame AOC and Bernie could not hijack the Democratic Party like Krasnov did to the fucking GOP.

    I wish her the best of luck if she decides to run and she would stomp on Vance.

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A hell of a lot needs to happen before AOC has a snowballs chance in hell in 2028. Like, Trumps impeachment — to start.

  • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ahh yes… The very free and fair 2028 elections we’ll being having. The Republicans definitely won’t try every trick in the book to manipulate them or stop them outright. Nevermind establishment Dems fucking over primaries to shoehorn in their milquetoast candidates, while fucking over actual progressives!

    I am so looking forward to voting our way out of fascism/ a dictatorship, as has absolutely been exhibited to work multiple times through history.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The DNC will use all their resources to sabotage her and place a Israeli loyalist that supports insider trading, forgiving the criminals in charge now, not reversing any of the shareholder first policies and deregulation and continuing to ratchet us to Nazi land while gaslighting us about how great the economy is because line go up for the capitalist class.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Part of the reason why social democracy is so important on the path to socialism is because line must go up for everyone or we’re totally screwed. I have no doubt the DNC will do whatever it can to undermine a candidate like AOC, but if we can implement a policy like Medicare for all, that will be a massive win for getting to the goal in more ways than one.

  • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just another example of how America is collapsing under the weight of its own corporate/oligarch dictatorship, corruption, ignorance, racism, and mental illness epidemic.

    An intelligent, empathetic leader is basically tied with a traitorous, criminally sociopathic, con artist who possesses zero morals or ethics, and literally works for someone he previously called Hitler…

    If the US weren’t a failed state, Trump would be in prison and Vance would be a fucking nobody.

  • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had no idea who this JD Vance person was until he became trump’s running mate. Dude you’re not popular or interesting on your own. Don’t act like people actually like you, couch fucking baby.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’ve been flying blind. JD’s been the spectre haunting American politics since the Obama Era. That creepy little turd’s backed his way up the drainpipe of American politics with the help of everyone from James Dobson to Oprah. He’s the Republicans’ Hillary Clinton.

      • bigfondue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        He’s a Peter Thiel project. They met when Vance was in either college or law school. Shillbilly never would have met any of those people without Thiel’s help. Probably would never even have gotten a book deal trashing his family.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    People didn’t want Kamala because she wasn’t democratically elected as the leader of the party in a primary so they let full blown fascism take over instead. They felt it was more important to send the Democrats a message instead of actually keeping some minimal form of democracy and freedom. 🙄

    So they’ll probably not vote for AOC if she becomes leader of the Democratic party anyway because of some minor excuse, like how she supported Israel’s right to exist, or something. And the US will end up with a third Trump mandate.

    I hope the US will prove me wrong. My hope in Americans doing the right thing is pretty low.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Kamala pr was so terrible that she lost because of the issue of economy and border protection

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    JFC, “JD” “Vance” is about as appealing as a bucket of piss. How in the fuck is this even close?

    I get it - AOC doesn’t have a dong and so a lot of mouthbreathers rule her out on that alone. But still, Christ. This is the stupid bootlick that called Donvict a Nazi and is now his VP and sits there and chastises one of our allies like some kind of cartoon bully.

    • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      America has repeatedly proven it will not vote for a woman, no matter how qualified she is

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’ve proven we don’t like centrist women with status quo platforms pretty convincingly. Anything more is speculative imo.

        • Ech@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And yet it’s elected centrist man after centrist man. Funny, that.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The last time there was another option on the table he became the first black president in our nation’s history. Perhaps there’s a lesson to be learned there.

            • Ech@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I think it’s a stretch to say Obama wasn’t centrist, but really it’s irrelevant. US voters were fine with voting in centrist men in if they were appealing enough, but once a centrist woman is put up, they’ll let a self-confessed wannabe dictator into office with hardly a fight.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Obama certainly acted like a centrist but that’s not how he campaigned which means that’s not what won him the election.

                • Ech@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Again, irrelevant. Also, he won twice, so his initial campaign wasn’t the end all be all, either.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guarantee you a far left woman like AOC is not going to get elected. Too many independents think she’s too far left. The right can win by being extreme right. The left can’t win by being extreme left. Not in this shithole.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s what they said about far left black men until Obama came along running as a progressive and won handily. For some reason we didn’t learn any lessons from that and went right back to boring centrist candidates afterwards.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The women who were presented to America had many more problems than their gender. I’m not discounting the reality that a woman has to be exceptional to be considered adequate by the electorate, but “America will not vote for a woman” is true until it’s not.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nah, I just think you personally are sexist and are looking to voters to validate your beliefs. Americans will vote for a women candidate. They just won’t vote for an uninspiring third way Democrat, whether they have a vag or not.

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The election isn’t won by getting the most total votes which means getting more than 50%+1 of liberal states isn’t worth anything and losing 1% of swing states loses you the whole thing.

    Anyone who is statistically tied with couch fucker is not a great bet

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m all for a women president eventually, but perhaps the elections during an attempted fascist take over isn’t the time.

    Some men will simply not vote for a woman, it’s sad, but it’s reality. If a woman is on the ballot the democrats will lose again.

    The time will come, just not yet with stakes this high. I would love to see AOC as the first female president.

    • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      someone should take one for the team and form an alternative socialist government of the united states as a micronation. seriously!

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m still of the VERY strong opinion that Hillary and Kamala didn’t lose because they were women, but because they were Hillary and Kamala.

      I don’t know, but maybe we shouldn’t base our gender litmus test off of literally the most unlikeable women the DNC could have picked.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think you’re mostly right, but being women had to be at least a few percent of it.

        Harris wasn’t the “most unlikeable” by a long shot, but she was certainly a solid “meh”.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Harris was hamstrung by not having a primary and listening to the worst possible advice from the people that helped Clinton lose to Trump.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Attitudes like yours are why Democrats lose elections. We talk ourselves out of our best candidates. We try to compromise with Republicans right out the gate, and try to select the more moderate ‘electable’ candidate.

      Your line of thinking got us Kerry, Clinton, and Biden.

      Trying to select a candidate based on “electability” is bullshit, because you just end up selecting for the most uninspiring centrist who can’t get people to the polls.

      You think you’re selecting for winners, but you’re taking your strongest pieces off the board.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Your line of thinking got us Kerry, Clinton, and Biden.

        It got us Biden. I think you underestimate how much institutional support Kerry and Clinton had in the run up to their nominations. Kerry wasn’t even that bad of a candidate on his face. He just got railroaded in Ohio the same way Gore did in Florida, while everyone in national media threw up their hands and proclaimed “Too Liberal!”

      • drhodl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are wrong. This is literally the worst time to be offering up a “first time for…” candidate. The stakes are way too high to run that experiment. I love AOC and think she’d be a fine president, but at this time of hate and misogyny, she is too great a risk.

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Camila and Hilary both lost, mate. Can’t be any more “losing strategy” than that, mate. Jeebus, but your education system has failed you badly. Personally, I’d try something different.

        • bigfondue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If she wins the primary she should be the candidate. She probably won’t though, because the dems are going to sandbag her and select a safe corpo pol like the corpse of Chuck Schumer

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          And how well has your strategy of “don’t rock the boat, don’t try anything new” been working out for you there, buddy? How many elections do we need to lose before you realize that you have crap instincts on what makes a candidate electable? In our current electoral landscape, the quickest way to lose an election is to be stupid enough to pick the “safe” candidate.

          I think you may literally be insane. After all, what is insanity but repeating the same action again and again, but expecting a different result?

          I think you personally don’t want a woman president, and you’re hiding behind concerns of electability because it’s not socially acceptable on lemjy to be an overt misogynist.

          • drhodl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            I’m not an American, imbecile. But, like many elsewhere in the world, I have watched the rise of racism and misogyny in the US, and if the Dems do not account for that, they will lose yet again. I think you personally have no clue at all, and that you may be a neurotic republican tradwife. After all, offering useless opinions that are plain wrong, hoping for your dream result whilst actually shooting yourself in the foot, is kinda insane, too. Dems have “rocked the boat” with Camilla and Hilary in 2 of the past 3 elections and LOST, in case you didn’t notice. Read a newspaper, Mrs “Scientist” LOL.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure if you’ve been paying attention but Americans chose a felon rapist insurrectionist pedophile over a more qualified woman the last two times a woman has been on the ballot.

        Read the room.

        If we run a woman, we will lose. And that doesn’t even take into account that many people who aren’t liberals (independents) do not like AOC because they believe she is too liberal.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m glad you choose to ignore objective reality and say stupid, bumbling shit instead.

            Your teachers would be proud of the critical thinking skills you’ve developed. Keep up the good work.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I fear you are right. And with numbers like this, the Democrats have an uphill battle anyway, with all the rigging and ratfucking that the Republicans do, not to mention the EC system itself.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Vance won’t be the candidate and everyone knows it but Vance.

    I’d bet on Tucker Carlson. 🤢

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s going to be Donald Trump Jr. They won’t even need to change the hats.

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      I fear it’ll still be Trump, assuming he’s alive

      Is it in any way legal? No. Has that stopped him yet? Also no.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really want him to think he’s going to run again so that he’ll undermine anyone else that tries to run. And then he can croak or something after ruining the primaries and getting his followers to hate any would be successor.

      • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t even think Trump can legally be president today.

        And on top of what you said, there’s also the possibility that Trump will be alive but too senile to run.

        • DokPsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          He can’t legally run. He also has yet to be actually stopped from any of his other actions that are blatantly illegal so there is zero proof that he’ll stop now

          • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

            The 14th Amendment doesn’t say that he can’t run. It says that he can’t hold any office. Trump has a “disability” from when he engaged in insurrection by intentionally inciting it, and that disability has not been removed by Congress.

            This disability does not require he be convicted of any crime. Instead, the 14th Amendment simply requires that Congress enforce the Amendment:

            The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

            Donald Trump cannot legally hold any office under the United States. He cannot legally be president. The only reason he’s able to act like the president now is that Congress is not enforcing the Constitution.

            I wouldn’t be surprised if, at some point in the future, perhaps even after Trump passes away, Congress finally grows some backbone and enforces the amendment, just to try to make up for the embarrassment that Trump causes us, similar to how the Germans would rather not remember that Hitler had been the Chancellor of Germany. Trump might be retroactively declared to have never been the president after January 6, 2021, and I think that would be in line with what is written in the Constitution.