Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it’s “her decision to make,” she is a “very, very good politician.”

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been “out on the streets with her” and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. “It’s so incredibly genuine and open.”

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

  • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Conservatives will beat a woman every time. I love AOC, but for the love of God do they want to win?

    America is still too sexist.

    • danielton1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. She only lost because of the electoral college, which is an antiquated concept that needs to go away.

      Kamala Harris lost because she was a terrible candidate who was shoehorned in at the last second after it became apparent that Joe Biden was unfit to run for a second term. The Democrats and media lied about Biden for so long that it was too late to hold a proper primary. And by then, enough people were so upset that they just didn’t show up to vote, especially since the media kept telling everybody she was going to win for sure.

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Support for what ever she decides is next, although I feel like the senate would be a better step. However the democrats dont really have a face to back that isnt some centerist that thinks its ok to play with the bully after they have taken your lunch money or someone that is older than Wonder Bread ™.

  • OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a fucked up two-party system, the US cant really have female presidents. The candidate needs to round up new voters while retaining the old voters. A female candidate is sure to lose a lot of votes, just because she’s female and way too many idiots are uncomfortable with a woman in charge of something.

    While I’d love to see AOC as president, I think the democrats badly need to find a male to take the role as candidate.

  • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would like to say: clinton didn’t lose because she’s a woman, she lost because she’s a sleazeball. harris didn’t lose because she’s a woman, she lost because she was courting the right wing for some reason. AOC can win because she’s not a sleazy right winging neolib. I’d vote for her for president.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not saying you’re wrong, but don’t underestimate the role of misogyny. A commentator on a podcast i listen to was in the US in the run-up to the last election and they said that something they heard over and over again in the people they talked to was variations on “i hate Trump and everything he stands for, but i couldn’t trust the country to a woman”

    • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Both Harris and Clinton position themselves as more of the status quo. Trump both time always positions himself as an outsider who taps into to racism and white rage. The only time you can win off a status quo type deal if the Dem admin was doing amazing during when they had power.

      • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yea, republicans piss on you and say it’s that guy, Dems piss on you and say it’s raining.

        Atleast piss in my mouth and we’ll all be happy

  • JHRD1880@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think she’s amazing, but we’ve already seen that Americans don’t want a female president yet.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think that plenty of people who voted for Trump would be fine voting for a woman president as long as she’s strongly advocating change

    These people just know that things aren’t great, they don’t know whose fault it was or what policies caused it. So they vote for the person who says they’ll change the most.

    The largest deciding factor stated by people after voting was the economy. People remembered that there was a lot of inflation under Biden, and didn’t want to keep similar policies. Of course, we know that Trump’s first term had a pretty large influence on the state of the economy under Biden, and Biden’s policies probably didn’t hurt the economy. But the average voter is not that informed.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think that plenty of people who voted for Trump would be fine voting for a woman president

      I’m sorry, but this is based on what, exactly? I know you didn’t base it on historical data. Trump won against Hillary Clinton, a woman, lost against Joe Biden, a man, then won against Kamala Harris, a woman.

      2016 turnout for Clinton/Trump: 128,837,949

      2020 turnout for Biden/Trump: 155,507,476

      2024 turnout for Harris/Trump: 152,319,643

      3,187,833 fewer people turned out for the Harris/Trump election.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That’s two data points influenced by countless other factors. Like the economy, which I mentioned.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it worked out so well the last two times the democrats tried to elect a female president.

    Clinton lost to Trump.

    Harris lost to Trump.

    So what chance would AOC have against a more qualified republican candidate? And I say that with the assumption than anyone who isn’t a Trump is by default, a more qualified candidate.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hilary was a terrible person yet she still won the popular vote. Harris is such a dumb politicians who can’t answer a single question correctly

  • Capernaum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    AOC supports Israel. We cannot have pro-Israel candidates. If AOC is the candidate, I’m not voting for her.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s exactly 0 politicians opposing Israel in all of USA. Which one do you think should run for president?

      • iridebikes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s what leftists want. There is zero unity on the left. I get mobbed on here for saying I’ll vote as far left as I can before I’m forced to vote centrist. It’s a reality. We’ve faced that reality three cycles in a row now. The right has nothing but unity. I’ll vote for a leftist female as far as I can. Will the rest of the left?

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lol the DNC has chosen Newsom as the new golden boy.

    The DNC would run the corpse of Hillary Clinton again before letting a progressive have power.

    I would love for AOC to actually be allowed to be voted on, because she would probably win the popular vote like progressives almost always do.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I really hate to say this, but there’s no way a woman will win in 2028 (if an election even happens).

    The vast centrist vote will go towards stability and a return to the ‘values’ they think have been lost.

    It sucks a lot, but the only viable choice will be a white man. I hate this, but it’s true.

    Walz is probably the most politically viable choice. Does that suck? Yeah. But pragmatically, it’s just true.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I really hate to say this

      Come on, do you really think that though? gender is an issue to be factored in, but considering it the primary factor is a level of cynicism thats effectively bordering on hopelessness. Maybe you earned that cynicism, I get that, being a a real american lefty is hard lately. How about we stand behind someone who inspires? Who seems to care about the issues that affect the constituents? who at least seems to not be one of the bought and paid for AIPAC drones?
      But you’d ponder running some asshat zionist like walz or shaprio instead, simply because they have a pecker and no tits? I dont think america is so far gone that they would pass up an inspirational human for a male human. And if we are, then its not worth fighting for anyway. If we are that far gone then its time for all of us to run.

      Reminds me of a quote from the green mile movie.
      “I’m rightly tired of the pain I hear and feel, boss. I’m tired of bein on the road, lonely as a robin in the rain. Not never havin no buddy to go on with or tell me where we’s comin from or goin to or why. I’m tired of people bein ugly to each other. It feels like pieces of glass in my head. I’m tired of all the times I’ve wanted to help and couldn’t. I’m tired of bein in the dark. Mostly it’s the pain. There’s too much. If I could end it, I would. But I can’t.”

      Gotta keep fighting till its time to run, and then keep fighting after that, or we’ll be a disappointment to our kids.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          well. shit. If we cant unite behind a good candidate because we think an asshat consolation candidate must win, I dont know how we win, because the asshat candidates always sell us out in the end. It the DNC way of things.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I get it. The truth hurts, especially right now when what we desperately need is hope.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Non an american but I feel like US needs a revolutionary candidate to come back from Trump. It has to be someone strong enough to put nazis back into their place.

    It’s still early to talk about this though right? From what I understand the upcoming midterms will shape everything else.

  • Prizefighter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I saw this coming a mile away and I hope she does win the Presidential Election to break barriers and to end the nonsense going on currently.

    Problem is the conservatives will argue/debate no woman should be in power followed by countless historical references to prove their point. Then someone will show even more historical references of conservatives causing twice to three times the issues. This will turn into one giant circle jerk of why they (conservative) won’t listen to a woman when they don’t even listen to their own parents.

    • iridebikes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. I would love AOC to win but there’s no chance in America for that to happen. Our populace is deranged.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Seriously. A bland corporate candidate who gave the opposition two decades of lead time to build up an opposition strategy. One of the worst candidates to have run of all time.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hillary won the popular vote and still lost in a system where the popular vote doesn’t matter. We have a rigged system. I voted for Hillary. It’s not that I don’t have faith in our candidates. I don’t have faith in the system and my fellow Americans.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The people who would especially hate her would never vote for a non-republican anyway so ya’ll just need to get over it and just go for all-in.

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Utterly boring “safe” candidates on the supposed left is how we got here in the first place. Give me a straight-up Marxist, just not with that messaging. And who would they be running against, Vance? Ha

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Third female candidate in four election cycles. I dunno, feels like we are asking to lose. And again, I would love to vote for her. Just don’t think the populace can muster it. I have lost all faith in Americans. The hope from Obama’s terms is completely gone.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yea, it wasn’t the support for genocide or the fact that she was running around with Liz Cheney for a lot of the campaign. Nope, it was all because she was a woman.

            Be serious.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s true, but we aren’t talking about that now are we? I imagine you’re trying to get at the fact that Trump is worse for Gaza and Liz Cheney is a “better” Republican?

                There are/were a lot of people in the US who were/are getting incredibly fucking tired of the right-wingedneas of the Democratic primary. This party did not give them a primary to get to choose their candidate and then they ran a full-blown conservative who alienated their voter base to try to entice people out of a fucking cult. The Dems spat in the face of the people who wanted to vote for them while sucking off the people who would come to assassinate one of their reps and not give a shit about it.

                It had nothing to do with her being a woman. Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton were conservatives and people are tired of handing over “wins by default” to those people. I mean, look at how both of them who “totally cared so much about the US” just immediately faded into the background except for a book deal and you can see immediately why no one was buying their garbage.

                • iridebikes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  If you think that any kind of intellectual examination was part of people’s decision making process last election, you are sorely mistaken. It really surprises me that on Lemmy, people think that 90% of voters even think about these things. They don’t. And they won’t. Look at the polling leading up to 2024. Harris was ahead for quite a bit. As the day got closer and Trump started running tabloid ads about trans and immigrants, the polls shifted.

                  The shift in polling had nothing to do with these nuanced takes about centrists and war hawks and corporate Democrats. Nothing. The masses voted based on last minute bigoted propaganda and claimed it was about the economy.

                  Your reasoning may apply in small, isolated circles. We are talking about the masses and no, I don’t buy it. I’ve talked to too many people.

      • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        She’d face the exact same misogyny that Harris did, the difference though would be she’d have a strong enthusiastic volunteer base behind her. I think if the election is fair she’d have very good odds.

        • iridebikes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          We tried Clinton. We tried Harris. I know the conditions are different, but do we really want to risk it when abject fascism is the consequence?

          • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I think having an authentic populist voice is more important than any race or gender considerations. We simply don’t have another candidate that can do this as credibly as AOC. I think if she runs, in the primary, she’ll handily beat out Newsom, Pritzker or any other white guys in the party who are in a position to run.

          • Triasha@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Running a milqtoast centrist is just fascism with extra steps. They will do nothing of substance and then people will vote for fascists to enact change.

            • iridebikes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I agree but the issue isn’t what is right. It’s about getting the candidate over the finish line.

              • Triasha@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not going to go for fascism with extra steps when there is even the slightest chance of something better.

                • iridebikes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  So when the primary is done and the candidates are a centrist vs fascist, you’re going to sit out?

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean how many times do we have to learn the hard way that America won’t elect a woman to be president?

    Look at this country.

    It’s a shitshow.

    It didn’t elect a woman when the other option was a felon, rapist, insurrectionist manchild with one failed presidency and two impeachments already under his belt.

    Do we really want to do this again when the stakes are so unbelievably high?

    Goddamn. People need to get their heads screwed on straight. She isn’t just a woman, she’s also profoundly hated by a lot of Americans for being so progressive. Why the fuck would we do this to ourselves? I mean America wouldn’t even elect Bernie, the male version of her with a lot more experience.

    WE NEED TO START LIVING IN REALITY.

    I like AOC. I respect her for what she does. But she’s not going to be president in 2028.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is why we have primaries. We don’t need to guess. The last 3 democratic candidates bypassed the primaries because the dem leadership are morons.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s not necessarily “because she was a woman”, though without a doubt it was factor.

      it was also because they were out of touch neoliberals. Hillary was clearly playing dirty with Bernie, and Kamala was actively participating a genocide.