A few snippets from the article:
“They gave her some medication, but they didn’t do any tests, didn’t do any CT scans. If they did, they would have caught it,” Newkirk said.
Who said that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure? How much would the CT scan have cost?
Smith ended up being taken to the hospital where she worked. A CT scan revealed multiple blood clots in her brain. Unfortunately, there was nothing doctors could do, and Smith was declared brain dead.
A mother and wife lost because the hospital wanted to skimp out on the diagnostic that might have saved her.
More than 90 days later, Smith’s family, including her young son, is still by her side as she remains on life support, but they say they weren’t given any say in her case because of Georgia’s heartbeat law. The law bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around 6 weeks into pregnancy.
90 days out of a possible 220 or so days. How much has it cost to keep her alive since her brain death, and how much is it going to cost to keep her alive for 130 more days? And remember, it’s not just $, but emotional health for her boyfriend, mother, son, and anyone else not mentioned/interviewed.
“She’s pregnant with my grandson, but my grandson may be blind, may not be able to walk, wheelchair bound. We don’t know if he’ll live once she has him,” Newkirk said. “It should have been left up to the family.”
And all of this for a baby that is likely to suffer major medical issues due to gestating in a brain-dead, possibly otherwise compromised body, hooped up on medication and other medical intervention to preserve the body’s life long enough for the baby to be born, possibly severely compromised itself.
Newkirk says she wants people to understand the human toll of Georgia’s law and the emotional weight of being stripped of medical decision-making during a crisis.
But of course Cons don’t give a shit about this. Woman dies, leaving behind a son, mother, boyfriend, and countless friends? Nah, that’s not important. BABY MUST BE BORN, no matter how injured gestating in a body like that will make it, making the baby a burden on other people, because GAWD’S WILL and bullshit like that. :|
Ahhh, so we’re gestating our young in the corpses of their mothers now? That seems less than ideal.
Yeah this is some Imperium of Man bullshit, wtf.
Literally the prelude to Death Stranding.
I love that game… But I would NOT want to live in that world lol.
It’s pretty much the Axolotl Tanks from the Dune series. An overtly patriarchal society that hates its women eventually decides the preferred course of action is turn them into lobitomized, unrecognizable gestational vats.
For a profit as well.
I just want to know what’s going through the head of the lonely single downvoter you have at the time of this post. What sort of horrific mindset would prompt them to vote your comment down. Does this shithead think that this ISN’T a case of a baby being gestated in the body of his/her dead mother? Or does this shithead think that gestating babies in the corpses of dead mothers kept alive by technology at great expense is a good thing?
What an awful person, this downvoter.
It seems like there should be a prophecy that mentions this.
Its a real tragedy, I dont want to belittle that with my question:
who is paying the medical bill?
Not the state I’m sure.
It will be taken out of her estate and her son will get zero inheritance.
More likely: it goes to debt collectors, and debt collectors being the scum of the earth they are will try to trick her family into taking on the debt.
Young moms don’t have money. Gotta be old, white, and male. I bet her estate can’t afford half the hospital bills. Taxes will cover most.
Imagine working day in and day out in the place that can save you, and even that’s not enough to do it because money
No one cares about the dead mother … no one will care about the child after its born
The unborn baby is at its peak right now because once it comes into this world … absolutely no one will give a shit about it
Stuff like this is why I say abortion is pro-life
What life will that child have?
Most conservatives could boil down their hatred of abortion to the fact that leftists and liberals are for it.
Religion, my ass… They see political parties like sports teams. They just want to win and feel like you lost.
Abortion was never a religious point until the figureheads figured out they can divide people with this bullshit.
God performs an abortion in the fucking Bible FFS
I hate this fucking country.
Another sick, yet apt representation of the Republican value of being pro-birth and not pro-life.
The family should sue the state.
The family should destroy the state.
and we should help them
Kept the baby alive so it can grow up and pay the hospital fees?
Let the mother rest. Her care was already botched by the lack of evaluation when she went to the hospital. She should not be expected to carry her son for any length of time. This is wildly disrespectful to her and the family.
Being black and going to the hospital for an emergency is scary! Are you going to get the doctor that secretly hates black people or a doctor that still believes black people have higher pain tolerance so no need for local anesthesia.
She’s not carrying it… she’s dead… they are growing a baby inside of a corpse… which will not be very good for the development of the baby let me tell you… it’s almost like you need a living body to properly transfer nutrients to a growing human being but they’ll find out… they will find the fuck out. This is a fucking Horror Show
Why stop after that.
I’m sure her corpse could pump out at least one more before she flatlined.
Or are we going to deny those potential babies the right to life?
/S
Don’t give them ideas.
Does anyone in the entire process ever just wonder… Are we the baddies?
So as a doctor working in an intensive care unit, we even know we’re the baddies sometimes. We’ve had people quit over that. Pretty hard to fight the system and take people off of live support. I’m in Austria and the laws are pretty different here. Best thing we can do if we think a patient isn’t benefiting from more life prolonging interventions is to do an “ethic council”. There a bunch of different doctors who don’t work at the same unit and a lawyer get together and decide what to do. Still we had some people rotting to death in our unit. Also people on life support where we knew we could never get them out of intensive care and just prolonging their suffering. In the end some kind of infection will take them. But we’re just prolonging their suffering and their families suffering who are trusting us. Horrible situation all around. And the thing is we do that because the surgeon in charge doesn’t want them to die because then the surgery will be considered failed In statistics. So we keep them alive for 30 days… I’m still in training so can’t really change the system just make people as comfortable as possible with painmedication and sedation until they’re allowed to die. (Usually after 30 days so the surgery is seen as successful)
Adriana Smith, a registered nurse at Atlanta’s Emory University Hospital, was about 9 weeks pregnant when she started having bad headaches in February. The 30-year-old went to Northside Hospital for help but was released after being given medication, according to her mother, April Newkirk.
From the headline I thought it was a situation where she was brain dead and it was 6 months in and the foetus only needed a little while longer to become viable and, so long as she wanted the child, they could maybe have kept it going until they could prepare for all the necessary care a severely premature baby would need. 9 weeks though?! That’s absurd. That’s just pigheaded stupidity!
Someone should sneak in and pull the plug, or the family should withdraw consent to treatment or something (I don’t know the laws).
Pretty sure that’s the point, that the family isn’t allowed to withdraw consent due to the insane “abortion” laws. This is so far past abortion. America is disgusting and grotesque.
holy shit this is beyond disgusting
You know, for religious people, you would think conservatives would find it satanic to grow a baby inside of a dead woman, like an afront to God or something, but hey, who am I to tell them which one of their crazy BS morals makes more or less sense.
Not to mention God clearly wants her dead but scientists are keeping her alive.
Doctors are keeping her alive by law, because of religious conservative control freaks*
Fixed it for you.
Eh, God doesn’t exist, scientists just keep getting better at controlling nature
I know you already get it, but imma say it for the folks in the back who haven’t figured it out yet.
More disposable bodies for the meat grinder, no matter what. More slaves to be sacrificed on the altar of profit. There can be no fun, no joy, no fulfillment for the masses, only toil and suffering and birthing the next generation. This is why they hate the lgbt’s so much, because we’re having sex for fun and not producing more disposable bodies for the meat grinder.
These people don’t believe in brain death. They think she’s alive and her soul is still powering her body.
“Her soul is in heaven, satan posessed her body and the child is the child of the beast!” - Some religious people too.
I’ve heard it all. If one believes something, another doesn’t and it all makes sense, because that’s what God wanted (according to them and some random part of the bible that so happens to very vaguely support them).
God in the end is just a manifestation of their own desires to control others, whichever form of control they want to exercise anyway. They are control freaks. They can’t help it.
Oh, you don’t want to give birth after death and leave your family in financial and emotional distress? Too bad, I’m in control! It’s God that said so, suck it! I get to control you in his name!
Totally unrealistic everyone knows the child of the beast is in the White House
