• Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    All of these wed based uber-projects are built on Chrome. This is bad. This gives more control to google and strengthens their strangle hold over web technologies.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Maybe some of the other browsers should implement the tech needed to do this kind of thing then? Cause as far as I know, Chrome is the only browser that can give a websites access to USB.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s also bad because why the fuck should a web browser have that much access to the hardware to begin with?!

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Also why the fuck is the OS giving the web browser the option of giving it that access to the hardware?

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          As long as it’s doable from userspace the OS doesn’t know what’s a browser or what is being controlled with external code. Blame the concept of ambient authority

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Jesus fucking christ can’t you people ever just let something be good for once

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Adding security, compatability, and vendor lock-in issues in exchange for convenience is not a good thing. Remember ActiveX and Silverlight? They forced users into uning IE. I am still finding industrial applications whos only config page is some ancient, IE only, nightmare.

        • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          In this case the spec is published, so it wouldn’t be a lock-in or compatibility issue if the other vendors didn’t lock themselves out.

          Security, I get, but when I’ve used it to flash esp32s before the user agent pops up a box asking me which device I want to give access to before the website sees anything, so it’s not transparent and it doesn’t give it access to everything on my system.

          I use Firefox all the time, but keep a Chromium on my system basically for stuff like this occasionally, and also web calls because Firefox’s implementation of the audio API doesn’t let me change microphones in the webapp, it just exposes one mic, and I’ve had issues with that before, so I join all calls in Chromium.

        • 0x0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Cant wait for Adobe Flash to make a comeback resulting in us being forced to use it to do something asinine like pay rent

    • dgdft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      not said is that their online updater only works with chromium based browsers

      Currently, it only supports Chromium-based browsers.

      Second paragraph, yo.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I refused to install a Chromium based browser until recently, which was needed as a dependency for some software. At least it supports the base Chromium, which is free from all those bullshit of the other browsers its based on. I just recently updated the driver in a virtual machine with Windows 10 and their software installed. So using Chromium would be an improvement here. Still sad I have to use a different browser than Firefox, but Chromium will be just my “firmware-updater” and not my browser at all.

  • xxploit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    You could already run the firmware updater with Proton/Wine though? At least I didn’t have an issue with that, but its obviously not helpful to everyone considering the many flavours of linux. Nice that they recognize and are at least trying to address the issue though

  • tuda224@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Where’s the difference? A program still has to fetch drivers and software from somewhere.