• Porto881@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Forced out.” welcome to a primary, Biden. Functional parties have them.

      • Porto881@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Both shams when we know that the DNC picks their favorite from day one and works with the media to form their narrative. 90% of voters are just looking to be told who to vote for.

        Look no further than Kamala. Right up until 21 July, when Biden was facing calls to resign by rank and file Dems every day, we were getting puff piece after puff piece that “Biden still polls better than Kamala Harris,” “Biden is still the best possible candidate.” Well, Biden eventually caved and literally overnight Harris became not only the real best chance, but actually was looking really good. Nothing about her changed. None of her policies changed overnight. The only thing that changed was that she was now the status quo choice and therefore “safe” for the MSM to endorse.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        A sham primary in which the DNC shut out new candidates, refused to have debates, and then coronated a new candidate anyway.

        • Xanthobilly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ll catch downvotes for this, but every incumbent president has a primary that is abbreviated and dominated by the incumbent. Biden is no different than Obama, Bush, etc. That said, you can and should still be critical of the DNC not hosting a full primary when Harris was tapped out.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s not an accident though, the party is choosing to shut out new candidates. I think it’s always wrong to do, because it puts even more power over our elections into the hands of billionaires.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          If the DNC couldn’t stop Marianne Williamson from running against Biden, then they couldn’t stop anyone.

          And the DNC doesn’t run debates, they are generally run by the media networks.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            The DNC removed delegates for an entire state during the primary, they argued in court in 2016 they didn’t have to respect the voters as a private company. They’ve been actively suppressing democracy in primaries ever since Obama skipped the line.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              They removed the delegates of New Hampshire, because New Hampshire didn’t follow the rules. New Hampshire thought it was entitled to vote first even though it was clearly another state’s turn to vote first.

              Eventually the DNC ended up reinstating the NH delegates.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          People were free to choose from a list of candidates. That’s equally “legitimate” as most primaries.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        Here in California, we haven’t had a presidential democratic primary since 2016, and he wasn’t running then. Please explain how he won, when the DNC cancelled the 2020 primary before we even got to vote, and never had a 2024 primary?

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean that’s obviously a lie. There’s documentation that proves primaries were held. I voted in mine.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          There was a California primary in 2024.

          • Biden won 3,207,687 votes
          • Williamson won 146,356 votes

          Other candidates included

          • Eban Cambridge
          • Gabriel Cornejo
          • Stephen P Lyons
          • Armando “Mando” Perez-Serrato
          • Dean Phillips
          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I was signed up for mail in voting, and never got a primary ballot in 2020. Got one in 2024 but of course there wasn’t a presidential primary option.

            Also how many votes did Bernie get, cause we had tons of Bernie voters here in 2016 and 2020

        • Aphelion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          What are even talking about? I voted by mail in both 2020 and 2024 primaries, in California.