Removed by mod

You’re circling the point without really identifying it. Dems lost in '16 and '24 because they did not hold primaries and just hoped that there were enough people opposed to Trump that they’d vote for whoever they chose.

On the other hand, in what might be the only credit you can give him, Trump faced three primaries in the Republican party and won them not by the party leaders pre-selecting him, but by actually being more popular with voters than the other guys.

A wise man knows that you can still finish the race by walking backwards

Pedo slur, wut? I thought it was Chomo. The dude just called him a pedophile protector, something demonstrably true

Removed by mod

“Fatally shooting” someone is called murder when it’s calculated and done to the back of the head of a mother trying to drive away BTW

Wow, who had someone named Bari Weiss as an enemy of the people and destroyer of the truth? Truly a shock. That Bari Weiss, I swear, I’d have thought they were one of the good ones

I wouldn’t worry about Chuck S.'s glasses running out of nose length.

Removed by mod

Hillary Clintonberg is here to tell you that your eyes, ears, and heart are, actually, totally wrong.

Don’t you have a whistleblower to suicide, Hillary?

Costco’s legal department being the last remainining Constitutional lawyers in America was not something I expected but am not surprised about, either.

If Musk’s spoiler party does anything next year, I suspect she may be involved in that

Oh FFS

He’s flailing to see what sticks. Praise from a ChoMo means nothing

and Dems need to tone down their violent rhetoric btw

The full files have been seen by lots of people on both sides of the aisle and third parties. It isn’t like they’ve actually been kept under lock until now. If anything is tampered with, it would be easy to prove. As far as any repercussions for lying, I’ve got nothing

Wow thats crazy how they’re going to side with Democrats and are implicated in the Epstein files as being pedophiles. Jack of all trades

And I’m supposed to believe that “I give you fish because you’re hungry and you give me a jacket because I’m cold” is a less-advanced, more primitive model than this?

You mean to tell me that companies would take advantage of a temporary disruption in the markets to justify a permanent price increase? That the rules of our economic model even forbid the lowering of costs? Surely you’ve been mistaken

But surely the companies would lower their prices once tariffs went away, right?