Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Marc Siegel made some eyebrow-raising comments lamenting that birth rates are down among teenagers aged 15 to 19.

On Thursday, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that the U.S. fertility rate fell to another record low. The agency reported that the number of births per 1,000 women of childbearing age declined from 53.8 in 2024 to 53.1 last year. The latest figure represents a continuation of a decades-long decline in fertility rates.

Siegel joined Friday’s edition of America’s Newsroom, where Dana Perino said that while the continuing trend is not surprising, “the numbers might feel a little shocking.”

  • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This is actually one of the only demographics where fertility has fallen. Adult women have been having more or less the same amount of kids for a while now

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have a female coworker and her daughter is currently eight months pregnant at 14 with a 17-year-old father. She couldn’t be happier. She is also a hardcore republican and a diehard Trump supporter.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ruin your kids life early that is the republican motto. Trap them in never ending wage slavery.

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yep exactly, it runs in her family. She was pregnant with her first baby at 15 and her husband was in his early 40’s. Her husband is older than her dad by 5 years. She is currently 41 and her husband is 73. She also has a younger sister like 5 years younger and I believe she basically did the same thing being pregnant at 15-16 with a much older man.

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Actually, no, she lives in an old rundown house that has a bunch of Trump Flags and signs and she lives across the street from a Mexican restaurant and she absolutely hates the Mexicans, but loves eating there every night.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The replacement rate is down to 1.56, meaning every couple is having, on average, 1.56 children in the United States. We need two or above to keep the population at the same amount.

    There’s actually another way to keep the population up, and it’s great for America economically and culturally, and it makes the world a better place at the same time.

    • running_ragged@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Or maybe we give up on an economic model that requires unending population growth? Since you know, we live on a finite planet?

      We have to find a path to degrowth. Stop repeating talking points that imply population growth is our only path forward.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Did you not understand that I was talking about immigration? Which is one of the ways we solve that. All of that.

        Besides which we’re actually talking about keeping the population stable. A declining population is bad for everyone economically. Luckily population growth naturally slows down in modernized societies, which is why allowing people to immigrate is good for everyone.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Of course this is a major problem for the pedophile class. For the last 250 years the American Empire was able to function thanks to a countless number of uneducated people locked into perpetual poverty, having children at 14.

  • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Those 30 years old grandmas will be so proud

    🤢

    So that’s how they are now making pedophilia more accepted…… this is just great….

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lol yeah I bet it is $140 for a handful of things at Kroger and $45 at the pump plus $2,000 rent who’s having kids!!!

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    He’s advocating for girls under 18 to have children? 18 is the age of majority. If he’s advocating for sexual contact with children, he needs to be put on a list.

  • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think not having kids is the only realistic way to fight those capitalistic overlords. They can’t continue to get richer if the workforce, who does all the dirty work for them, keeps shrinking.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The issue, though, is that when only Conservatives have kids, the next generation grows up even more Conservative.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I don’t get what is so fucking hard for these pedophile conservative fucks to understand. When you make life fucking impossible to live, no one wants to bring a child into the world.

    Instead, their response is, “if we fuck children, we can raise the birth rate.”

    Fuck these ghouls. They just all need to die already.

    • minorkeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      People lived horrible lives in previous ages and still had lots of kids. Of course the answer to that was plenty of rape. Buuuut they don’t see that as a problem so…it isn’t about understanding, it’s about a complete lack of empathy.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Capitalism contributes, yes. But, if humanity stays below replacement rate, humanity goes extinct.

      Also, no matter how you distribute resources, there are periods of life when your productivity is less that what you need to survive. Everyone has this for many years at the beginning of their life, and those lucky enough to live long enough will have this toward the end of their lives, as aging is the disability that comes for us all. The proven method to sustain persons during those periods is to have enough people in their productive years; it generally requires more than the replacement rate. And, if that doesn’t happen, the less productive suffer and die more.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmu1WD2TSk

      All that said, I’m against encouraging teenage pregnancy, and for full bodily autonomy – no one should be forced to let anyone else use their uterus.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The Earth’s population has nearly doubled in my lifetime. I’m pretty sure we’re not quite endangered yet. I’ll also point out that poor countries that tend to spawn brown players are well above replacement levels if you count those as people.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, I’m not worried about running out of humans globally, and I do think immigration is a fine way for a country to choose to maintain their population.

          There’s probably something to be said around cultural preservation, and maybe that’s a bit easier for “native born” persons. But, I don’t know the steelman version of that argument, if there is one.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m against encouraging teenage pregnancy

        Encouraging teenage pregnancy isn’t the problem. The problem is the encouragement in general. As said, full bodily autonomy - it should remain a right for all.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The problem is the encouragement in general

          I don’t see why that’s a problem. I think it could come in the form of actual benefits, not a just verbal haranguing / extolling based on (not) having children, but that it’s good for the birth rate to be slightly above replacement and correcting any divergence should be encouraged.

          • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You’re sabotaging your own argument here. You stated full body autonomy to be a right to then dismiss that within this statement.

            no one should be forced to let anyone else use their uterus

            Tell me, how does this relate to your current argument?

            • bss03@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              “full body autonomy” includes but is not limited to “no one [is] forced to let anyone else use their uterus”. I don’t believe I am sabotaging my own argument, but I’m an idiot, so maybe you just need to be more meticulous in explaining how I am (doing that).

              I bring it up because authoritarians often try to restrict bodily autonomy, particularly around uteruses, when trying to do population control (up or down). In fact, while it may not be a acceptable, mainstream view, you don’t have to look to hard to find a USian on the right claiming that abortion must (become/stay) illegal because of the “birth rate crisis”.