Maple.Social
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months ago

DOJ Drops Experience Requirement for New Prosecutors

www.mediaite.com

external-link
message-square
17
fedilink
257
external-link

DOJ Drops Experience Requirement for New Prosecutors

www.mediaite.com

Redditsux@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 6 months ago
message-square
17
fedilink
The DOJ has slashed a policy requiring all new-hire federal prosectors to have a minimum of one year of experience practicing law amid major hiring struggles.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    LOL, of course they did.

    Everything about this stupid hack and his administration is total clown shoes.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    So like…same as the other moronic tools they’ve been hiring. Got it.

    • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      They had experience in primary school. This next round is going to be fully illiterate.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can’t be held back by the constitution if you can’t read the constitution.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Bwhaha.

    This is gonna end well.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Probably because they don’t find enough qualified people who drop morals and regards for the law when told to do so.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nobody’s willing to take a contempt charge for the planned incompetence of their bosses

  • P1k1e@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh sure, that’ll get those cases won

  • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    We’re so fucked. Three more years of this crap, at least.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      As long as we don’t start appointing Judges with zero experience this is a win.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    They do very poorly in front of Federal judges with that little experience.

    Good.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The point isn’t to win. It’s to put on a show. Republicans don’t do actual work.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Was not aware they had an experience requirement

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t they still need to pass the Bar exam in the state where they want to go to court?

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    At one time in the past, being a lawyer for the government would make any parent proud. Now it’s like being an enemy against the good citizens of your own country.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Might as well drop the requirement that they pass the BAR exam

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.05K users / day
  • 2.51K users / week
  • 4.43K users / month
  • 9.17K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.1K subscribers
  • 14.7K Posts
  • 160K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org