The Cold War? Child’s play compared to what lies ahead, according to U.S. historian Robert Kagan. Trump, he says, is leading the world into the most dangerous era since 1945.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The last decade has made it abundantly clear how weak America actually is.

    Growing up I just assumed we would stomp this kind of shit out real fast. Instead we’re bending over and letting an almost dead felon rapist pedophile fuck our country and our futures up. We’re allowing a clearly treasonous party to abdicate all their responsibilities to a fat creep that falls asleep and shits his pants during official duties.

    It’s truly pathetic.

    Don’t think I’ll be able to muster up much patriotism for this shithole for the remainder of my life.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    The 2001 Patriot Act is the cornerstone and the MAGA fucknuts pushed ahead with their insane Project 2025 BS!

  • Raglesnarf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve mentioned this before to others whenever this comes up. most or a great majority of people in the US have it “good enough” to not “risk it all”.

    Things over here “aren’t bad enough” for people to full-on revolt. I’d say we’re kinda close but modern, white, boring america just doesn’t want to get caught in the shit storm. They understand it might come for them at some point but that time isn’t now so why “stick their neck out”

    • Absolutely. I’m very aware of my “white privilege”.

      I vote. I’ve protested and will again.

      Yet, I’m going away for long weekends and I have a very big vacation coming in 2 months. I’m sure many people find that selfish and offensive. However, I consider it my personal survival technique.

      Best of luck to everyone.

        • Oh, I am… My GF and I are logging at least one day of OT per week to pay for that big vacation. I’ll be @ 54 hrs this week by end of today’s shift. And my company pays “critical staffing” bonus of $10/hr on top of my 1.5X OT rate.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      First they came for the ‘illegals’, but I did not do anything as I wasn’t an illegal.
      Then they came for the trans, but I did not speak up for I wasn’t trans.
      Then they came for etc etc etc.

      Waiting for dictators to do the right thing is never ever a good idea.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      8 hours ago

      most or a great majority of people in the US have it “good enough” to not “risk it all”.

      Most of the people I know are barely hanging on and desperate to keep the little they have. When you’re barely getting by, like 60% of Americans currently living paycheck to paycheck, you can’t afford to risk anything.

      They’re too busy making sure their kids don’t starve, or making sure they can stretch the last bit of money until the next check. Doesn’t help that all we do is exploit these people any chance we can.

      And I’d bet a lot of people in that situation don’t really care to help repair a system that never really worked for them in the first place.

      It’s not the right approach, you and I know that. But desperate people don’t act rationally. They act emotionally. And our society has gotten really good at manipulating peoples emotions.

      • jaaake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The people living paycheck to paycheck are ones who would make the most impact by striking, but are least able to as they will starve, be evicted, lose utilities/cell/internet if they do.

        The people who are making enough money to be comfortable are afraid that if they upset the people above them, they will become the people living paycheck to paycheck.

        The independently wealthy and top tier capitalists are the ones that have the most financial freedom to protest, but have the least reason to, are the smallest group, and are mostly fine with how things are (at best) or actively making things worse (most likely).

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sadly yes, when it finally does get to the point where most of America says “we’ve had enough!” I feel the water will be boiling and the frog will be almost cooked.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The Cold War? Child’s play compared to what lies ahead, according to U.S. historian Robert Kagan. Trump, he says, is leading the world into the most dangerous era since 1945 1933.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Tyrants always have the advantage in a “civil society”…

    (Almost) Everything he does is legal so people treat it as fair game even if we don’t like it, and aside from ICE murdering people, there isn’t any direct violence to fight against so the “civil society” has to wait until it’s wayyyyyyyy too late, to the point that we’re all being sent to the gas chambers, until it decides it’s morally correct to use violence.

    Until that point we’re left hoping our “representatives” will “fight” for us (hahahahahahahahahahahahaha… Ughh…)

    :(

  • Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You’re not seeing real resistance because people in this country have been convinced that they don’t need to exercise their 2nd Amendment. That it’s an outdated amendment that only “those other people” feel a need to exercise and that police and national guard are going to fill the role that a citizen formed militia would. Also they’re trialling this stuff in cities where armed resistance isn’t likely to occur. Let’s not forget that they only teach the non-violent aspect of the civil rights movement and completely gloss over the impact armed minorities had in the face of violent oppression. Folks need to wake up.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Also they’re trialling this stuff in cities where armed resistance isn’t likely to occur

      I’m sure someone out there is thinking “well all the rural areas are red” but that isn’t really the case. And I worry about the unhinged things we will see if ice tries to roll out into rural WV or AR or even TX. Somewhere where the stop signs have holes in them.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    There is a combination of factors that is turning America, a country founded on evicting a King from our government, into a country with a de-facto one.

    First, one of the foundational principles of the country was the separation of powers. Specific powers were given to specific branches of government. The founders anticipated that ambitious people would fill those branches, and they would not give up that power so easily. They did not anticipate a Congress that would abdicate it’s power over directing the Executive branch when their guy is there. And a Supreme Court picked expressly to choose sides.

    Second, the founders realized that there needed to be someone in charge of the Federal executive that had some real power. Recall that we had already formed one government , under the “Articles of Confederation”, with a weak central government that was not working. But, they did not trust the general electorate to pick it. That is the original purpose of the Electoral College: State Legislatures would name delegates, and those delegates would pick the President. We retain the Electoral College not because it still works in the modern era, but because it is too hard to change. (The fact that Congress hasn’t changed in size for 100 years also contributes to the inequity of the Electoral College, since each state’s votes are tied to their representation. In fact, I think the EC might still be workable if each district were smaller…).

    Third, we had built up a strong tradition of non-partianship in the executive branch, with career civil servants doing their jobs across administrations, providing continuity. We even thought that protection was entrenched in law. But then this guy comes along, and decides that none of those laws matter. Once that merit-based expertise leaves, it is very hard to get back. And he can violate laws with impunity because of Point #1.

    So, while we don’t call Trump a King officially, his office is being turned into a monarchy, where his opinion rules all and the rule of law is subject to it.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    One reason is that the US is just too big and too different to fight back effectively.

    I think the most practical resistance is the west coast trying to split off.

    It’s a lot easier to rally an entire state than an entire country.

  • TheHighRoad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We have been sufficiently divided to prevent collective action until it is too late. Those who should be allied with us are too distracted by gender arguments and religious propaganda to notice the boot coming down for us all.

  • Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t want to sound like a Bible beater because religion is very much not a part of my life. But I know the Bible. If the warnings in Daniel, Theologians, revelation about an antichrist is true, everything that describes an antichrist, Trump fits to a a T, and this board of peace. I dunno it’s starting to be more than a coincidence to me.