The Cold War? Child’s play compared to what lies ahead, according to U.S. historian Robert Kagan. Trump, he says, is leading the world into the most dangerous era since 1945.

  • Raglesnarf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’ve mentioned this before to others whenever this comes up. most or a great majority of people in the US have it “good enough” to not “risk it all”.

    Things over here “aren’t bad enough” for people to full-on revolt. I’d say we’re kinda close but modern, white, boring america just doesn’t want to get caught in the shit storm. They understand it might come for them at some point but that time isn’t now so why “stick their neck out”

    • Absolutely. I’m very aware of my “white privilege”.

      I vote. I’ve protested and will again.

      Yet, I’m going away for long weekends and I have a very big vacation coming in 2 months. I’m sure many people find that selfish and offensive. However, I consider it my personal survival technique.

      Best of luck to everyone.

        • Oh, I am… My GF and I are logging at least one day of OT per week to pay for that big vacation. I’ll be @ 54 hrs this week by end of today’s shift. And my company pays “critical staffing” bonus of $10/hr on top of my 1.5X OT rate.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      First they came for the ‘illegals’, but I did not do anything as I wasn’t an illegal.
      Then they came for the trans, but I did not speak up for I wasn’t trans.
      Then they came for etc etc etc.

      Waiting for dictators to do the right thing is never ever a good idea.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 hours ago

      most or a great majority of people in the US have it “good enough” to not “risk it all”.

      Most of the people I know are barely hanging on and desperate to keep the little they have. When you’re barely getting by, like 60% of Americans currently living paycheck to paycheck, you can’t afford to risk anything.

      They’re too busy making sure their kids don’t starve, or making sure they can stretch the last bit of money until the next check. Doesn’t help that all we do is exploit these people any chance we can.

      And I’d bet a lot of people in that situation don’t really care to help repair a system that never really worked for them in the first place.

      It’s not the right approach, you and I know that. But desperate people don’t act rationally. They act emotionally. And our society has gotten really good at manipulating peoples emotions.

      • jaaake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        The people living paycheck to paycheck are ones who would make the most impact by striking, but are least able to as they will starve, be evicted, lose utilities/cell/internet if they do.

        The people who are making enough money to be comfortable are afraid that if they upset the people above them, they will become the people living paycheck to paycheck.

        The independently wealthy and top tier capitalists are the ones that have the most financial freedom to protest, but have the least reason to, are the smallest group, and are mostly fine with how things are (at best) or actively making things worse (most likely).

    • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Sadly yes, when it finally does get to the point where most of America says “we’ve had enough!” I feel the water will be boiling and the frog will be almost cooked.