A separate judge had ruled that Halligan, who brought cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, was unlawfully appointed.

A federal judge Tuesday ordered Trump ally Lindsey Halligan to explain why she continues to call herself the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia even though another judge determined in November that she had been unlawfully appointed to the position.

U.S. District Judge David Novak of Richmond issued a three-page order demanding to know why Halligan is still serving in the post. Halligan, who unsuccessfully prosecuted former FBI Direct James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, is also referred to as U.S. attorney by the Justice Department in official documents.

The judge’s order is unusual because he issued it on his own, not at the request of defense attorneys. It came in a case involving a carjacking and attempted bank robbery suspect who was indicted last month.

  • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 days ago

    We need to stop affording these people the protection of the same laws they disregard daily. Either they are bound and protected, or unbound and unprotected. PERIOD.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The answer is clear: the regime does not abide by laws or court rulings - the US has now abandoned even the appearance of being a constitutional state. If US citizens have a problem with this, they should rise up against all the corruption and all the crimes. However, since they are not doing so, we will continue to read news stories like this.

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, under this regime, the US is no longer a constitutional state. And that is why I believe it is impossible to remove the regime by constitutional means. Some people point to the midterms and say that the president will then be a lame duck. That applies to presidents who abide by the law, but not to one who has no scruples whatsoever. Waiting to see what happens will only give the orange child molester more time.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 days ago

    Novak gave Halligan seven days to respond in writing “explaining the basis for … identification of herself as the United States Attorney, notwithstanding Judge Currie’s contrary ruling. She shall also set forth the reasons why this Court should not strike Ms. Halligan’s identification of herself as United States Attorney from the indictment in this matter.”

    The judge’s order goes on to say Halligan “shall further explain why her identification does not constitute a false or misleading statement.” Novak also alluded to potential disciplinary action and demanded that Halligan sign her response.

    Judge big mad

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because she’s hot in a specific “Trump’s preferred kind of hot” way. Come on people is it really that hard to see

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    The answer for these people is to hold them without bail awaiting charges… Then don’t bother bringing chargers until the current regime is toppled. They can’t be pardoned, because there’s no conviction. Someone could order that they be released… But the judge/jail/court can, and should just ignore that order. Kevin mitnick was held for 4.5 years without bail, and without a trial. We already have a precedent

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    What the fuck? After I heard about the previous court ruling I figured that would be the end of it. They’re just flatly ignoring the judge on this? If I were a jljudge, I’d start tossing all cases brought by the eastern district of VA until she is no longer leading the division.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because the judge has no power to enforce. That lies under the executive. Which other “judges” have determined is above the law. Congratulations. You played yourself judicial branch.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      You played yourself judicial branch.

      No they didn’t. They played us. This was their plan the whole time. An unaccountable, all powerful dictator president.