

- A quick search brings up nothing with ICE and “warheads” so it doesn’t appear to be “widely reported”. Can you give evidence for your claims?
- I didn’t say that the article is making unsubstantiated claims. I said that you are. The article is substantiated, it just isn’t all that surprising that ICE is spending more on weaponry as they hire more agents.
- The story says nothing about slush funds or anything beyond ICE spending more on weaponry.
- You are posting in a public forum. That is explicitly asking for conversation and feedback, even if you didn’t directly ask me for mine. If you don’t want people to respond, don’t post.

So, the Democrats push their member to resign while the Republicans allow theirs to hold on until it won’t hurt their vote margin. If the dems hadn’t lost one, the repubs would have let him keep hanging on.