• AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    We’ve had elections during a war before and we can do it again. Ukrainian laws don’t apply to the US.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      If the war was closer or even inside the US, it might be a different thing. I wouldn’t be surprised if he could still consider it though.

        • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I can’t help but feel like a civil war is a different scenario. Russia currently controls 20% of Ukraine. For the sake of simplicity, that’s 10 US states. I have a very hard time believing that if a foreign country had complete control of 10 states, and the majority of the people of those states, for all intents and purpose were unable to vote, an election would go over smoothly. I have to imagine it would be an utter shitshow.

          • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Practically, if the US was actually occupied by a foreign force (having a puppet president doesn’t count), then the occupied areas will not be able to cast their ballots, and the states being partially occupied will have a biased result and electors will be appointed by those living in unoccupied areas. If a whole state is occupied, they probably would have electoral votes that are not cast (since they wouldn’t have a certificate of ascertainment from the now defunct state government). Election would get very ugly even if its a 51/49 split in the remaining electoral college votes since if, say, a state with 18 electors is occupied, one side could get 265 electoral votes and the other gets 255 electoral votes, so there would be a constitutional crisis on whether this counts as a majority (265/520) or not a majority (265/538).

            But I’m guessing they’ll go by Civil War precedent and just exclude the occupied states from being counted so its probably 520 as the total electoral votes using that same example.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I see where you’re coming from, though I would argue that if we’re at war in '28 it won’t be because the US was invaded by a foreign power.

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    10 days ago

    He’s telling everyone what his plan is. War incoming by Jan 2029.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    He is NOT JOKING. This is his plan.

    You think he’s deploying the military on US soil because he gives a fuck about law and order? Guess again. He’s testing the waters now to see what he can get away with when the time comes.

    Federal elections have never been cancelled or postponed in the history of the nation. Not even for the Civil War, or WWII. It’s mandated by the constitution.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      Same how the 14th Amendment to the Constitution is basically invalidated as long as some states hold off on challenging his EO undoing it.

      He’ll do some “Elections will happen, but only in states that are nice to me and I expect to win” EO and will basically take CA and IL out of the results, and their results won’t be certified by Congress. Because right now it’s a race to rig 2026 to save donor campaign money.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      He is a dictator. There will be no more elections. America is an autocracy.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 days ago

    Zelenskyy’s comment about war and instability was NOT BEING THE SIDE THAT STARTED THE WAR.

    IMPORTANT DISTINCTION.

    anyways, EPSTEIN FILES. WHERE THEY AT?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s not even that. It’s about what the country’s structure permits. Ukraine doesn’t allow for midwar elections, the us doesn’t allow for skipping them.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      IMPORTANT DISTINCTION.

      It’s really not. Lincoln held midterms in the middle of the Civil War. FDR held elections after Pearl Harbor. Ffs, Bush cleaned up the year after 9/11 and rode the pro-war election wave through 2004.

      The idea that your elected leadership is immune to recall when you’re in a state of war is anathema to democracy. It insulates unpopular leaders and empowers military dictators.

      There is no distinction, save that liberals like Zelensky and hate Trump.

    • Mamdani_Da_Savior@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Also America has never really been invaded during an election…at least not its homeland…to any significant extent. The civil war is the best example, but that wasn’t even a foreign enemy. Now if China say invaded the west coast, and cities like Portland, LA, San Diego, etc are solidly in Chinese hands wiht the Chinese moving across the rockies and the President and Congress come along and and collectively go “We think we should pause elections until things get stable”…I’d have a hard time arguing against that.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 days ago

    lol cool so he just said the quiet part of the playbook out loud.

    For those in the back: he’s gonna get the US in to a Serious Fucking War right before the next election so that he can pretend he’s got justification to call off elections.

    Pay no mind to the fact that FDR won his third term at the peak of WW2.

    Come to think of it: that’s probably why he wants to do it: he knows he probably can’t win another election (putting aside the illegality of running and serving for a third term), and doesn’t want to think about himself being overshadowed by “some old librul Democrat from the 1940s”. And yes, that is a completely serious guesstimate on orangeboi’s rationale for this.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      “Serving” LOL as of Trump is serving anyone but himself. He’s made billions in bribes since taking power. He doesn’t serve Americans, he serves himself to whatever he wants. Mostly golf and killing people.

  • bigbabybilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 days ago

    That’s what this shitfuck does. He ‘jokes’ about an idea, then repeats it until it sounds normal, then does whatever the fuck he wants and nobody does anything about it.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I thought that’s why y’all kept sacrificing children to gun violence, but apparently they were to support, not fight, facism. Or at least to have them hanging there while supposedly American values get trampled.

      • MisterOwl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s exactly what he’s hoping for.

        He’s militarizing cities as we speak. If he keeps amping it up, protests will theoretically follow. MAGA will find some reason to claim these protests “turned violent”. Trump declares martial law and cancels elections. Done.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ya’ll think the US will ever collectively understand that they can’t keep pretending like these things are jokes or “wouldn’t actually happen”? I swear, Trump could grow a little mustache and people would be saying “oh no, I can’t believe we’re about to fall into fascism!”.

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 days ago

    He’s not joking. What does he have to do to be taken seriously? A hostile takeover of the capital?

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 days ago

    “by joking” you fucking dumbwits, are you not learning at all? He doesn’t care if he can or not, he will bruteforce his way through legislation with his MAGAlitia. They are ALREADY utilizing fear and suppression with their masked terrorists kidnapping people off the streets or posting up next to demonstations. If you are not acting now, tomorrow might already be too late.