• Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Blatantly unconstitutional. The voting is directly controlled by the state constitutions, not the fed. Even congress would need to amend the constitution to do this, but we’ll see how the bench legislators in SCOTUS rule.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 days ago

    Among other serious problems, this would disenfranchise all military service members stationed or deployed outside their home state. The Democrats really should be making a big deal out of that.

    • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 days ago

      “Oh but it’s not going to effect them at all because you see, they’re using absentee ballots which are a totally different and completely secure thing.”

      Actual talking point I’ve seen floating around already.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 days ago

      No, this is one we should be concerned about. Eliminate mail-in voting, and democrats won’t win another election again. The vast majority of people vote by mail.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        He can’t eliminate mail-in voting by executive order.

        And before you say ‘he doesn’t care about the law he’ll do it anyway,’ no state that isn’t already fallen to the crazy will acknowledge such an order.

        This is an obvious distraction. One you are falling for.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 days ago

      He’ll just shut down USPS for the 6 weeks leading up to the next election.

      • bluemellophone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 days ago

        Oregon has been entirely state-wide mail-in voting for decades. Good luck shutting down an entire state’s mail for more than a month.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I mean, it already worked didn’t it?

          First term the USPS was taken from a trusted, consistent, and reliable way to move mail. I to something that a considerable number of people no longer trust BECAUSE it was sabotaged.

          All he has to do is continue sabotaging our institutions, then they will no longer be effective, and can be cut down with public approval. Since voters have the memories of gnats.

          It doesn’t need to shut down, it just needs to be made ineffective, gutted, and sold to UPS & FedEx for pennies on the dollar. So private corps can benefit from our public investments, to our detriment.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Probably never.

      It will be like in Russia: your vote doesn’t matter, but elections still take place as a way for the “Great Leader” to assert his power and dominance over the masses. Elections then become a lie that everyone knows but no one can publicly say, a form of exhibitionism in honor of the King’s power to control the narrative, to distort reality.

      Unfortunately, the new American elections will become a gruesome feast mocking democracy where every guest already knows the results.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    WTAF. Assuming we even still have voting, I’m going to be so pissed if this dementia-addled diaper-filling piece of shit means voting in Colorado has to be in-person.

    Fuck this guy.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      So are dozens of others, that didn’t stop them from being enforced and acted up on.

      Unlike the laws that our constitution outlines, which are not enforced or observed.

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        that didn’t stop them from being enforced and acted up on.

        Well, technically congress can invent a financial reward for following its legislative incentives. So, Congress can essentially bribe a state into followibg its ideals, but a state can opt out in favor of self governance so long as it does jot interfere with a power expressed to Congress nor violate the amendments to the us constitution via the 14th and 15th Amendments. So, a state cannot create voting test laws and the such, but they can decide what a district does or doesn’t look like.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s an executive order, it doesn’t have that power.

    Yet states and other agencies will “make it happen” as if it does.

  • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    How much would it cost realistically for us to go back to paper only, each district or country or however you wanna chop it up is allotted x amount of dollars and y amount of time, and we count this shit one by one on public TV so that if you want to see your own ballot actually be counted and confirmed, you can because they’d be serialized and you could guestimate. People will have backups for calling horseshit, etc. it cannot not be worth it.

    I don’t give a single fuck about same day results, this is democracy and people’s lives for the next decade plus.

    I know for a fact it wouldn’t cost a single percentage of what this administration alone has cost us.