The UCMJ is a huge part of training and members know they are able to refuse unlawful orders. The trouble is distinguishing what is unlawful. They certainly don’t have international law degrees and nobody can be fully up to speed on all treaties and mutual aid agreements.

deleted by creator

We must be on like volume 73 by now.

the only reason she receives mass support and attention is she’s a white women

honestly the fact that I have to prove that climate change overwhelmingly effects countries that arent even close to primarly white

You don’t. What you need to prove is that Greta Thunberg is only valued because she is a white woman. That was your assertion with which people took issue.

That’s why I stick to Cocoa Pebbles.

That community has put up with a lot of shit from this asshole. I’d suggest they raze the tower to the ground, but instead they should crib it with imminent domain and use it as a homeless shelter.

How it isn’t triple digits will always escape me.

But you’re saying you don’t think anybody here has any knowledge they didn’t get from Google, which is just not true. There is some value in community discussion.

Are you suggesting googling around the internet is in all cases better than community discussion with people of varying expertise, some of which can provide tailored evidence to help you find good information? I’m not so sure.

5g is amazing when the coverage is good though.

They kind of are when the courts are captured.

I actually agree with you otherwise, but I think a candidate could come entirely from outside politics and still be a good candidate. You won’t know them until you see them, but it can happen.

I suppose it was for those in that circle.

Well, only one side voted the measure down.

Yeah. We should be soft on him until some magical moment. Then it will be time to strike with more strongly worded letters. Thanks for reminding us.

GUYS! Don’t be mean to Trump. We need to be nice to him, for now.

🙄

They gave the keys to the castle directly to the Clinton campaign. But maybe they’ll have integrity one day. We’ll probably have all turned to dust by then.

You could say also they’d rather select that than a qualified “person”. Should no opposition ever run again? Or is it clear that she was not chosen because of her gender? Maybe so, but that feels to me like it completely overlooks that there could be anything about her personality or positions responsible.

I’m not comfortable saying AOC or any other woman is a non-starter because other women have failed. A lot of people have failed before and at some point perhaps one will be selected. I think she would be a good choice, and more appealing to many than Kamala, I suspect.

I feel it might be precisely the opposite of that. The left constantly capitulates and tries to play nice. Always forgiving and taking the high road. Fuck that. Sometimes people are dumb, dangerous, wrong, and evil, and nobody should have a problem saying “You fucked up”. It’s on you to earn respect back, not me to give it to you and a shoulder to cry on.

Well, yes they could tackle them. And in fact they could ask a sheriff to do anything. Sheriffs actually do have an obscene amount of power in many jurisdictions. But have this work out in their favor? Nah. Supremacy Clause and law of more firepower isn’t going to go well in that, I suspect.