You quite literally don’t need that, you just need both large options to fail obviously, as they are. People will seek out alternatives and there will be enough that aren’t disillusioned with electoralism that go for that option.

You cant organize on a large scale in the US, you get assassinated if you survive the character assassination.

For example, I bet you still think stein is a Russian spy or spoiler candidate.

Hard disagree, as again, the republican party exists. It was a third party.

Practically no one votes strategically. The vast majority of voters vote the same as their parents and/or peers. The extreme minority of voters that care about issues vote for whatever party of the two that suits them best at the time.

But bigger than all these groups are the eligible voters that think nothing will change because people like you tell them they only have two options, so they don’t vote.

Because neither option is good. There is Nazi, and there is the group that appoints nazis. Both exist solely for their own power and wealth. Neither help people until the riots get too violent. So why vote. Why care?

So either we introduce a third party or more, and maybe give some hope, or we let the uniparty continue to win and we all have to survive a balkanized US when it collapses.

Europe would be the worst pick for Harris. Maybe the Philippines or other thinly disguised police state.

Exactly the opposite of reality. FPTP does not preclude third parties from winning, hence the existence of the republican party. It does mean you have to vote your principles and not strategically vote. If everyone voted for the party that most closely aligned with their principles, neither the Dems or repubs would ever wing the presidency and would never hold a majority in any Congress at any level.

Harris is guaranteed to lose 2028 if she is somehow the dem nominee instead of the republican nominee. There aren’t enough right wingers willing to abandon the name republican to vote for her.

One she already lost once. And was given the role without a vote the second time.

For the us; it would end the US economy overnight. There isn’t a product manufactured in the US or service done in the US that does not involve something from china. Even at ridiculously high tariff prices there’s simply no alternative infrastructure for replacing those imports. Even the trump regime are slaves to capital given that’s the only thing backing the legitimacy of the US.

For china; the only thing imported from the US are luxury/private sector items. It genuinely does not affect the core industries (60% of Chinas gdp is in the public sector) of china, and with China’s welfare system, private industries can fail without the employees ever becoming homeless or starving. There simply isn’t a reason to go that far and needlessly escalate.

Tl;Dr nothing the US can do economically can realistically hurt china, just small parts of its private sector. China, however could cripple the US since the US allowed its companies to offload so much core industrial work to china. None of the actual adults in the US will allow trump to piss off china to the point of cutting off trade entirely, and china isn’t petty.

Europeans? Actively funding and participating in genocide?

Would you look at that, its just another day.

Words written by a socialist to satirize capital based dictatorships might not be the argument against leftists that you think it is.

Liberals aren’t ‘non-authoritarians’, you just think you should be able to buy authority and violence instead of being born into that luxury. You want violence in the hands of the rich, not the hands of the people where it belongs.

Liberals have been the only people in world history to choose fascism over any form of communism, since fascism doesn’t threaten their world view.

This includes the dem party in the US who picked clinton, biden, and harris, three far right shit stains, instead of anyone slightly centrist or left wing.

I’m pretty sure those are used accurately as specific types of fascists.

Sorry, niceness does not extend to fascists or their enablers due to recent world events. To resubscribe, stop being a cunt.

Just a reminder that communists weren’t the ones to appoint nazis to power; anti communists were. The ones that thought violence is never the answer and we should just vote harder if we don’t want fascists in power.

And everytime those people get power fascists get power shortly after. Maybe it’s not financially funding, but anti’tankies’ are responsible for every instance of fascism taking power. Because equality and equity scares you people.

Yeah I wonder if there was a reason the communists were fighting both the nazis and ‘social democrats,’ and had to spend more time fighting the larger group that was openly funding the nazis.

Many have, but that’s the thing Israel is still committing genocide if Palestinians leave their home.

Defending the weak and oppressed is a core pillar of Islam. Its not hypocritical .