Summary

President-elect Donald Trump and his incoming administration are debating the extent of potential U.S. military action against Mexican drug cartels.

Options discussed include targeted airstrikes, cyberattacks, covert operations, and “soft invasions” using special forces. Trump has warned Mexico to curb fentanyl trafficking or face military intervention.

His key appointees, such as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, support some form of military action, framing cartels as terrorist threats.

Critics fear this could escalate tensions with Mexico and spark significant international controversy.

  • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s USA’s record against insurgents? I know Trump went to the Taliban to make a deal after more than 2 decades fighting them.

      • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Idk, seems to me like a successful insurgent. Maybe not an immediate result but, with no real punishment, and getting in anyway, he def got away with it, and rewarded for doing it to boot. If there are future (non sham) elections, the message is loud and clear, this I’d acceptable behavior.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’ll hand over the Mexican government to the Zetas in exchange for some empty promises.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You joke but this proposal would effectively be a declaration of war on heavily armed criminals who already run parts of the country. There’s every possibility he destabilizes the place enough that surrendering Mexico City to the Zetas is how it ends.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a bit more complicated than most people realize. They know about Vietnam (loss), Iraq (win), and Afghanistan (loss). But there’s also;

      More recently -

      • The Philippines (win),
      • Lebanon (draw, objective achieved, but no decisive victory)
      • Somalia (draw, transition government was not deposed, no decisive victory),

      And through the years -

      • The Indian Wars 1776-1923 (win, massive war crimes),
      • US-Algiers (loss, impetus for creating the Navy),
      • The Barbary Wars (win),
      • Taiping Rebellion (Win),
      • Kansas mini Civil War (1854, goes into actual Civil War, Abolitionist win)
      • Second Opium war (win)
      • Utah Secession (win),
      • Mexican Civil War (win),
      • Cortina War (win),
      • Formosa Expedition (loss),
      • Garza War (win),
      • Las Cuevas War (win),
      • Boxer Rebellion (win),
      • Mexican Border War (win),
      • Banana Wars 1912-1934 (win)
      • Philippines Rebellion (win, but they do resurface for a modern conflict)

      You can see why we were a tad over confident going into Vietnam and even afterwards we thought we just needed to make some adjustments to our tactics.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not remotely comparable. Different fighters with different experiences and motivations. Fighting next door vs. halfway around the planet changes logistics, uh, a teeny bit. Different US government and soldier motivations.

      We’ve never done anything like this, no way to tell what will happen.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, except for all the other times we invaded countries in Latin America.

        And except for that time we invaded Mexico all the way down to Mexico City.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          “Invaded” with both hands tied behind our back.

          And my reply was to a post about failing in Afghanistan. So, uh, everything I said still stands.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well there was that one time, about 212 years ago, and ya’ll had a terrible time about it.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    These morons are gonna roll tanks into downtown Santa Fe while a confused crowd gathers for the parade and Trump in a gold John Wayne helmet orders them to open fire.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a real braintrust donvict has going there…JFC. And no wonder, given Junior the cokehead is apparently influencing a lot of picks.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or they could save billions, AND make billions after, just by legalize, tax and regulate it. Once that happens, the cartels will die off on their own. But hey, the defense lobby is really strong… So.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Been screaming that for years, now it’s too late. The cartels got wise and diversified their portfolio. We can no longer pull their teeth by legalizing.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Indeed, FFS, just legalize all of it. The WOSD has been far more harmful than the drugs themselves. But moneyed interests definitely want them illegal.

    • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Sorry to break it to you, but cartels are never gonna die off. They’re not something that’s currently happening in Mexico, they’re the backbone of the Mexican economy and have been since the revolution war a hundred years ago.

      More context: Cartels, although they weren’t called that back then, are how the revolution war was financed. They basically rolled up into small towns and took everything that wasn’t nailed down —including women— under the pretext that they needed it to “fight for freedom”. When the revolution ended and they had no excuse to ransack villages anymore, they pivoted onto drugs. If drugs are legalized, they’re just gonna pivot to something else. Right now, there’s cartels who barely sell drugs and make most of their money through kidnappings and extortion.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s cartels controlling the growth and distribution of Avocados. All the criminal behavior, none of the drugs.

  • dipcart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate to admit it, but somehow Ben Shapiro was right. He wrote about this in his terrible, awful, no good, very bad book True Allegiance. Although the reason why that invasion started was due to border crossings. And it wasn’t started by the president but by the governor of Texas.

    The book is awful but I recommend listening to Behind the Bastards’ (a podcast) reading of it because it is enlightening.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t know if Trump knows this but a lot of things here are made in Mexico.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Invade Mexico for what? Is this one of those “if we make them part of the country, there won’t be a border to cross” type of things?

    Edit: Haha I didn’t read they wanted to go after the cartels.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    For imports into the US, Mexico supplies about 70% of our vegetables and 50% of our fruit. For exports: In 2023 Mexico overtook China as the top importer of US exports.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Brings me back to Reddit in the early days of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Pessimism about war wasn’t very welcome among the lulz at Russia’s bluster about their prowess and impending parade in Kyiv. “Ukraine will win any day lol look Russia’s shit is crap”.

    The USA is acting just like Russia. Leaders and people.

    If it walks like a cuck, talks like a cuck, and cucks like a cuck, well…