• 3 Posts
  • 91 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • ICE is doing this now. They get information from TSA on who is going to be at what airports, and at which dates and times. That lets ICE make their arrest quotas with relatively low effort on their end.

    If you have any kind of not completely regular immigration status, I would urge you to avoid domestic air travel in the United States right now.

    People have been arrested at airports for overstayed visas, when they filed an adjustment of status on time, and the application has just been sitting at USCIS for several years.


  • So basically, Elon Musk was never the official Administrator of DOGE. It was this different woman that no one has heard of or seen.

    On paper Elon Musk was only ever a “Special Government Employee”. This is an advisory or consultant type position that normally comes with no salary. It allows the politicians and political appointees to bring in their old friends from outside government, so they can talk to them. And meanwhile the friends get badges and credentials and email accounts so they can function in the office. But the bottom line is that SGE only ever has advisory power; no real power.

    So that’s why Musk is not named on a lot of these suits. Anna Bower spent a lot of time trying to figure it out.


  • Here’s the plan for how the SAVE Act is intended to work:

    1. SAVE Act requires voter ID, but it actually requires a photo ID that says “US citizen” on the ID.
    2. For most people, the only identity documents that do that are passport books and passport cards.
    3. Bad news: By and large, Americans don’t have passports. Passport adoption is really low compared to Europe.
    4. Suddenly a bunch of Americans have to apply for passports to vote. Many will have trouble gathering the required documents, including birth certificates and marriage licenses (for name changes). Many won’t get it done in time.
    5. What a disaster! So many people can’t vote!
    6. But wait! SAVE Act comes in with a solution! States can be exempted from the ID bullshit.
    7. But there’s a catch! To get the exemption, your state must have been turning over its voter rolls to the feds, quarterly, since July, 2025.
    8. If your state, like every, uh, blue state, hasn’t been doing that… Well, I guess it just sucks to suck. There’s no way to become compliant now, and the SAVE Act hasn’t even been enacted yet.





  • The vote was 5-4 for the proposition that the Constitution guarantees birthright citizenship.

    The vote was 6-3 that a regular federal law guarantees the same right.

    Kavanaugh is the switcher. He voted against the Constitution and for the federal law. This is crazy because the relevant text in the law is a copy paste job from the Constitution. It’s the same text. Kavanaugh’s position is that the same words mean two different things in two different places, because the federal law was enacted at a different time than the constitutional amendment.

    Meanwhile, Gorsuch voted against birthright citizenship both times, but in his opinion he’s pretty clear that children born to parents who are domiciled in the US are citizens by birthright. Domicile means you are staying in the US long term and intend to remain. But you don’t need legal immigration status to have domicile. So that’s not really a Trump-friendly position if you dig into it.

    Edit: I meant to reply to the other comment, but I messed that up.



  • Misleading headline: The Court didn’t actually say that a warrant was required for these geofence searches.

    What the court actually said: a request for geofenced location data addressed to a service provider is actually a search that could require a warrant. These requests are not just subpoenas for business records.

    The supreme court sent the case back down to the circuit court to determine whether a warrant was specifically required in this case.

    When it comes to searches, a warrant is usually required, but there are a number of complicated exceptions for “reasonable” searches where no warrant is needed.












  • More than an investigation, there’s now a criminal indictment that alleges that SPLC, Inc. defrauded their donors when they paid undercover informants to infiltrate racist and extremist groups. The theory of the case is that SPLC was actually assisting and aiding these racist groups, contrary to SPLC’s public positions, by doing things like paying membership dues on behalf of their undercover informants.

    There are also money laundering charges on the basis that SPLC deliberately misstated the purpose of funds when they were transferring money over to the undercover infiltration side of the operation. Because, maybe, you know, they were trying to be under cover about it.