Jimmy’s interview with Democratic Senate candidate from Texas James Talarico was not televised because of threats from the FCC so we’re hosting their discussion here on YouTube. James talks about Republicans being scared of him winning, Jesus being co-opted by MAGA, the RNC Convention being held in Texas, not taking money from corporate PACs, Trump calling him a “freaky guy” and having second thoughts about endorsing his opponent Ken Paxton, and the GOP making it harder for people to vote.
I only heard of Talarico because they did the same to Colbert.
Streisand the shit out of this everyone. Also, Talarico is a very religious person, heads up.
I find that how much I care about how religious a person is, is directly proportional to how much they care that I am not.
I tend to agree. I listened to the interview a few hours ago, so I don’t even remember if he brought up religion or if Jimmy did. Of course Talarico is going to talk about religion if people ask him about it, it’s something he seems very passionate about. He said he’s from like 5 generations of people that have been devoted to the church and he’s in seminary school himself. If he’s going to be a publicly religious person, he at least seems against the hypocrisy so prevalent in most public figures when he talks about his “faith.”
I wasn’t going to listen to the interview because I think of him as “that religious guy from Texas” and I’m from across the country so it doesn’t really affect me, but I was bored and put it on while driving to work. He was calm and professional, and was very tasteful, respectful, and non-preachy nor creepily patriotic about his beliefs. If people want to believe in sky daddy, that is their prerogative, as long as they don’t try to force it on others. Fred Rogers was a very publicly religious man and we don’t talk smack on him for it cuz he didn’t bombard us with it and he practiced what he preached.
Is being publicly religious worse than all Paxton has done and will do? Texans are going to get one or the other, and Paxton is leading the polls with the 50yo+ that actually turns out to vote. Some people’s moral high ground really seems out of sync with reality. For as politically active and informed as people here like to talk, so many of you guys really confuse me sometimes what you feel you’re accomplishing with some of the things you say. (Not you, IrateAnteater!)
Yeah I’m trans and I don’t trust him at all.
He has since done an interview where he expressed regret over his vaguely supportive statements on gender.
So yea
Exactly what you’d expect
Edit: also this video (1:40) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS9Ct2uA9sk
I’m with you on that. I’m a straight, cis, white guy and I don’t trust him at all. He talks a decent game now, but if he does get elected and actually walks the walk afterwards… he’d be one of a vanishingly small group of people. Far more likely that he isn’t who he says he is.
Even if he’s 100% genuine, though… dude brings up God waaaay too often for my liking in an elected official. Makes me worried he’d legislate based on the bible.
He actually believes in the separation of church and state.
Same
Christians give Christ a bad rep.
I have met a lot of people who go to church. I have not met many Christians.
It already has more views than the average weekly TV performance ratings for this show of around 1.5M views.
I wonder if the recent change in how views are counted is the real source of that. Instead of needing to watch a portion of the video, even seeing a single frame is counted as a view now, apparently even if it’s just auto-playing from mouseover
I watched last night on YT, unsure which channel but it had 2.2 million views at 8pm PST
This dude is seriously awesome. He really should be the face of Christianity (not counting that other guy of course…).
Oh no. Christianity better be wiped from the face of the earth. With other islam and whatnot.
