• sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    He’s trying to keep electricity rates down for California residents (which are driven in part by wildfire costs). Is this the best way? I’m not sure. But if residents aren’t paying via electricity rates, they will pay another way. Insurance (if you can get it). Taxes (if voters will agree to it). Maybe other ways. None of them are that palatable.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They could tax insurance sales to high risk or high value properties. They’re the ones that will ultimately be the biggest burden in a fire anyway.

      In reality the costs should fall on the utility companies that likely caused several of the fires. But that would raise prices for everyone.