Access Denied
www.telegraph.co.uk

Huh, I guess it’s TACO Thursday unfortunately.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.caEnglish
    51·
    2 months ago

    I hope BBC goes after him regardless. Bring it all out in the open on that loser rapist flesh rot

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      14·
      2 months ago

      They’re almost certainly going to go after him for legal fees and his only defense would be that he believed there was actual harm which would also require release of his finances. He kinda fucked himself if they want to push it at all.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    421·
    2 months ago

    If there is no detriment for the attempt, the legal system is a tool of aggression, not justice. A claimed was made and the investigation should be seen to it’s conclusion.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      22·
      2 months ago

      Well yeah. American justice system is just another tool for the rich to bully the poor into being quiet.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    23·
    2 months ago

    Ha no. Fuck that, he don’t get taco out of this. Can BBC counter sue now? How do we get this discovery rolling?

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        31·
        2 months ago

        Sorry, I see that as a cookie wall, not a pay wall.

        So yes, you have to accept cookies to read the article, but you don’t have to give them your credit card info, and American sites just set cookies anyway.

        You should use a browser that lets you burn tabs’ cookies if you’re worried about it. (That’s what I do.) Alternatively get an ad blocker. My browser does its own ad blocking. It lets “sponsored” articles through, and similarly spoken ads included by the author in podcasts and videos but I don’t see Google’s ads on YouTube with it.

        Browser fingerprinting is real and google and other advertisers track you whether you allow cookies or not.