

I agree it would be a temporary measure. Realistically Republicans only need ~6 more governors on board before they can start talking constitutional amendments, and do away with these pesky restrictions all together.
I agree it would be a temporary measure. Realistically Republicans only need ~6 more governors on board before they can start talking constitutional amendments, and do away with these pesky restrictions all together.
Well, trump wouldn’t be elected into position - that is explicitly prohibited. So no running for him or Obama.
The “loophole” is that he’s trying to line up a coordinated effort to elect other GOP members. After elected they’ll nominate trump into the line of succession as Secretary of State or another unelected position. Once the pawns are in place, the line of succession simply has to step down until it falls to him. Third term without breaking the “elected twice to office” condition.
Fired!? Heavens no, multiple people should be in jail. but best we can do is pardons and maybe a raise.
Welcome to AI smartphones. We’re settling for this crap to capture real life.
“And with all the money they’re saving from the fraud, they could afford to give their senior citizens an increase,” said Lester, who is retired from construction work.
Wow, they really think Trump is compiling some kind of jackpot that’ll pay out big to the people. Looking more and more like US really are a nation of suckers.
Full agreement about the “team sport” and them setting the field for trump, but traditionally gop members had to be team corporate interests first to even get on the bench.
But perhaps it’s just me being shocked at the realization juggernaut companies like Ford and Intel are now being treated as “little guys” in the party controlled by individuals with billions in personal wealth.
No doubt. I just remember a time when ‘god, guns and gains’ were the only consistent republican policies, and this wasn’t long ago. Declaring the stock market irrelevant would have had them booted from the party quicker than you can say dow jones.
Now here we are, watching maga cult handwave it all away to liquidate. Just insane.
One of Mr. Trump’s advisers, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations, said the Biden presidency proved to Mr. Trump that the stock market is not a foolproof barometer of the economy’s future, nor a useful indicator of voter sentiment. If it were, Mr. Biden, who presided over a booming stock market, would surely be the president, the adviser said.
That’s one hell of a pivot, even for republicans.
So no steel, aluminum or electricity? Well crap, didn’t have bronze age dystopia on the bingo card.
“If they commit crimes” is doing a lot of lifting here. Sorry Tom, protesting is not against the law- yet…
No fucking shit. Said this the moment he announced it - the facility was not designed to hold this population, and flying people offshore is crazy expensive. Ignorant plan like all the others, falls apart when grandiose delusion meets reality.
We got GTA5 Remastered before GTA6
Yes, of course! As long as you make at least $100M a year, all investments will be returned as tax breaks.
Yup, my R representative hasn’t held a general town hall since 2016, but people keep voting him in! Must not be much to talk about.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Gumming up the courts further… They want the detainment and suffering to prolong.
https://80.lv/articles/ubisoft-executive-players-should-get-comfortable-with-not-owning-games/
“One of the things we saw is that gamers are used to, a little bit like DVD, having and owning their games. That’s the consumer shift that needs to happen. They got comfortable not owning their CD collection or DVD collection. That’s a transformation that’s been a bit slower to happen. As gamers grow comfortable in that aspect…”.
Interpreted as “Players Should Get Comfortable with Not Owning Games”
The real context was they wanted more subscriptions.
I realize I’m playing advocate for a devil that needs no help, and I hope you’re right. Simply saying there are arguments taking place that seperate the requirements of “being elected” as defined in the 22nd vs “being eligible” as defined by article 2.
As it’s been explained to me, this interpretation would of course be challenged, and ultimately determined by our wonderful supreme court.