• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Imma pin this one up for now.

    Please remember the rule on celebrating death. Graham was an asshole, that should be enough.

    In March 2016, Graham said: “I want you to use my words against me. If there’s a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said let’s let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination.” [1, 2]

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I know you’re getting shit from everyone, but thanks for volunteering to mod and put up with all the “edgy” people here.

    • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What, pray tell, is the “rule” about celebrating death? It couldn’t possibly be some absolute Reddit shit, could it?

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sidebar rule 6:

        “No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning.”

        • mechoman444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          The issue is that what is presented as a single rule is actually several different rules crammed into one sentence. It strings together multiple distinct ideas with commas, making it unclear where one prohibition ends and another begins. If each of those ideas is meant to stand on its own, they should be written as separate rules rather than bundled together under a single heading.

          Secondly, “celebrating death” is an extremely vague concept. Many cultures celebrate death in one form or another. Hindus, for example, have traditions that celebrate the passage into the next life. Creole culture also has a long history of turning funerals into communal celebrations.

          Moreover, what exactly constitutes a celebration of death? If someone feels happy that a particular person has died, they are not necessarily celebrating death itself. They are simply acknowledging that someone they disliked is gone and, in their view, that the world is objectively better off as a result.

          So if I say, “I am happy that so-and-so died,” that is not, in and of itself, a morally reprehensible statement. It merely expresses an individual’s emotions. No one is obligated to like another person or to feel sadness when they die. Death itself is not a moral act; the act of taking a life is. In this case, the individual died naturally rather than as the result of anyone’s actions.

          As a result, I see no compelling reason why death itself should never be celebrated, whether the sentiment is meant to admonish the deceased or to honor them.

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Maybe amend the rule to “celebrating death of actual human beings”. There’s one person whose death will be celebrated far and wide, for sure.

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Any good justification for this rule you can think of?

          (Also… weird that you’re not actually enforcing it? Is it a “rule” or not?)

            • slickgoat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Not positive that you should be enforcing your own personal ethics onto other people. Free speech should be a thing. If a person did bad things and people are glad that he is no longer in a position to do bad things, that is a celebration in itself. Trying to enforce opinions like this is self-congratulatory in that you consider your opinion is superior and worthy of judicial enforcement.

              Note that I haven’t in the slightest commented on the man himself, yet still run the risk of banning. It all depends upon the moderator. This happens on Reddit all the time and that’s the problem with this kind of moderation. It has a chilling effect. Give a censor a job and they tend to censor.

            • D_C@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Ahhhh, the “when they go low, we go high” approach.
              Gee whizz, that approach has really been working out so far, hasn’t it…

            • Leo Dal Pozzo@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              39
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              So if we celebrated hitler’s death we lack humanity? People should be free to celebrate a death if they feel to. Forcing your idea of a moral code over people is not nice. We are not talking about celebrating violence, a crime or wishing for somebody’s death.

              People should be free to express their feelings if they don’t hurt anyone, without having to fear the morality police. The point of modorators should be to create a welcoming and safe space, not to impose your morality on others.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                shield
                M
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                27
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Doesn’t matter if you think it’s “nice” or not. It’s a rule for this community.

                • Leo Dal Pozzo@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Yes, and you could have answered “thanks for your input, but we are going to stick with our rules because we have our reasons”, instead you basically tell me “Doesn’t matter what you think, these are the rules and you must respect them. No discussion allowed”. I mean sure, you make the rules, but the way you enforce them and react to criticism speaks for itself.

              • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 hours ago

                No, no, you don’t get it. It’s not about being nice, it’s about telegraphing what a good, nonthreatening supplicant you are

                • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                  shield
                  M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I already said he was an asshole and cited the reason, that’s not supplication.

                  You don’t have to celebrate death to prove you aren’t a supplicant. 😉

            • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              40
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Jesus fucking Christ. We’re really doing this high road virtue signaling bullshit here, too? Cool. Continue being part of the problem, I guess.

                • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Is there a rule about talking about disliking it? I don’t see one in writing, but it seems like it wouldn’t matter.

            • bthest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Ok agreed. No surprise night raping or murdering people in colonial genocide projects that Graham Cracker. I hope we’ll all live to celebrate that fucker dying some day too.

              Now on the celebrations.

          • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Community rules are aggressively enforced against people the mods disagree with and fairly lax with those they agree. Jordan is usually pretty fair though. But yeah the celebrating death rule is applied very very inconsistently.

  • Azal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    I know that we’re not to celebrate death of Graham so I’ll say the nicest thing I can think about him.

    Today for breakfast I had two eggs and an apple.

  • Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Emergency personnel responded to a call for “cardiac arrest” at Graham’s Capitol Hill home on Saturday night, according to police scanner audio obtained by NBC News.

    Photographs reviewed by NBC News show that paramedics carried a person on a stretcher from Graham’s home to an awaiting ambulance. Police cars and fire trucks were also on site.

    Jump up and clap hands with glee. Will miracles never cease?