• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Best case scenario it splits the republican voter base up a little bit. They have enough clout in their own circles to actually make a dent. I think one of the biggest reasons republicans won is because they are so unified in their hatred at the moment. Meanwhile, democrats are constantly divided on everything and can’t even agree with most of their voter base on a single topic. They’re all still garbage people, but I’d like to see them punch each other for once instead of always punching down.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah. I hope they peel something like 5-10% or more of the cons away to whatever they do, diminish those voting Republican, and ensure Democratic victories.

    • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The problem is the Left can’t seem to agree on anything, can’t seem to pass each other’s purity tests, can’t stomach voting for a candidate who isn’t “Left enough”

      Meanwhile the Right universally wants to own the libs, and they don’t give a fucking fuck what happens, so long as it makes the libruls angry.

      • n1ckn4m3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        What’s the old saying? Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line? It’s too fucking true.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I wish I could favorite one of my own comments, and instantly link to it.

      I have had an analogy that I’m sick of typing, over and over and over. I came up with it in 2020 to teach people why the democrats don’t make actual progress.

      And now, here, you’ve essentially summerized my analogy without even having read it. I wish I could just press 2 buttons and show you. But it’s like 5 paragraphs long. And I just typed it up again about a week ago when that algae thing went down.

      I don’t know if it’s possible to search a users comment history by keyword, but I’d search mine for “paint, republicans, democrats, home depot” that should do it.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    So something that happens a lot in history is there is this yoyo effect of extremism.

    Once one extremist is in power who inevitably fucks everyone, the people want an extremist on the other side.

    Unfortunately it’s usually the exact same kind of person. The people think it will be different but it won’t.

    Example. The French revolution begot Napoleon.

    Lenin and subsequently Vyacheslav Molotov begot Joseph Stalin and now Putin.

    It doesn’t always go bad like those two examples. But it’s a product of how angry people get and how they want an extremist to punish the people who are responsible for disaster.

    I myself feel like I want this.

    I want the next president to hold so many people accountable.

    What kind of person would that be ?

    It’s a slippery slope. We could get a self righteous narcissist or someone who just wants justice.

    It might be hard to tell which way someone is. (I’m sure I would know but I mean for the masses. Remember, many votes for Trump in the first place though I do believe there was election tampering tbh). Still.

    I think Tucker and mtg are the bad versions. And I worry that they might win over people for their vocal opposition and promises of accountability.

    It would be their best chance of moving up ranks to make that stance.