• GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Anything past 60 is just pissing contest stuff. 99% of games are totally playable at 60fps. 120+fps is great and everything, but if it’s going to cost you 2k to get there, I mean you run your own journey but I’d be fine almost all the time at 60fps.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      60 FPS is good for a flat screen, but 100+ FPS is better and I enjoy the vibrant fluidity of the games at those high framerates. I think I spent less than 2k on my PC but it has been a journey of upgrades over years so I’m not sure

      60 FPS is NOT good for VR though. 90 FPS is the bare minimum for smooth 3D immersion with any modern VR system.

    • arin@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      60fps is like saying 640x480 resolution is enough and eyes can’t see more pixels, no need for HD.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s a paper somewhere where researchers tested this. Some people discern higher frame rates, but many could not as the brain has a refresh rate of its own that analyzes incoming vision stream. At some point the brain won’t notice a difference because its only getting X snapshots per second, not a true live stream.

      • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I had plenty of fun playing Cyberpunk on my steam deck hooked up to a 1080p monitor running upscaled at around 30fps.